It's so big

by Anand Lal Shimpi on February 1, 2004 4:09 PM EST
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1956
Comments Locked

10 Comments

View All Comments

  • HammerFan - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    By the way the article was very educative (sp?). I liked it.
  • HammerFan - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    Anand, you and Derek made no mention about operating temperature in the article concerning prescott. Could you clear this up please as some people *cough*CRAMITPAL*cough* claim that the prescott runs brutally hot. I would assume not as it overclocked well but a little reassurance can't be a bad thing.

    Thanks in advance for your time.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    SeraphsSati

    No ignorance, it's a confusing market, I get turned around a lot myself :)

    UlricT

    I thought quite a bit about how a faster FSB would play into all of this, as it is another way of ensuring a full pipeline. However that is assuming that the current 800MHz FSB isn't enough to feed these processors, which I don't believe is the case. Also if you look at Intel's roadmaps, it doesn't look like any of the 2004 CPUs will get anything faster than a 800MHz FSB. I thought that Intel might want to introduce the faster FSB earlier but it doesn't seem to be in the cards at this point, and they know their own architecture a lot better than we do so I'm assuming they made the best decision possible for the frequencies we'd see this year.

    Take care,
    Anand

  • UlricT - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    Anand... do you think Intel would prepone the FSB (1200) increase coming with Tejas, as this should be something that can push the Prescott over Northwood...
  • SeraphsSati - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    Oh yea, good point. Nevermind my ignorance then.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    SeraphSati

    We included the EE because we included the FX51, they are both in the same price class.

    The Athlon 64 does not require registered memory and motherboards are affordable. You are thinking about the Athlon 64 FX.

    Take care,
    Anand
  • SeraphsSati - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    One last question. Why do you recommend Athlon64 over P4c in gaming? Doesn't 64 have more expensive mobos' and you need registered, expensive ram?
  • SeraphsSati - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    Awsome review Anand and Derek. Very thorough, and understandable. The only question I have is why add P4EE in benchmarks? No on in their right mind would consider the cpu even if it blows away competition.

    But I needed this review to tell me "wait for Tejas".
  • Anonymous - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    Starting to read now, *gasps*
  • SeraphsSati - Sunday, February 1, 2004 - link

    WOW 25

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now