Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
NVIDIA's GeForce 6200 & 6600 non-GT: Affordable Gaming
NVIDIA's GeForce 6200 & 6600 non-GT: Affordable Gaming
Date: October 11th, 2004
Topic: Video Card
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi
Buy the BFG BFGR66512OCE GeForce 6600 DDR2
Blank
 TigerDirect $34.99
10.00 rebate
 CompUSA $34.99
10.00 rebate
 TigerDirect $46.55
9.31 rebate
 
 


Power Consumption

A new and much needed addition to our GPU review is tracking power consumption. Here, we're using a simple meter to track the power consumption at the power supply level, so what we're left with is total system power consumption. But with the rest of the components in the test system remaining the same and the only variable being the video card, we're able to get a reasonably accurate estimate of peak power usage here.

At idle, all of the graphics cards pretty much perform the same, with the integrated graphics solution eating up the least amount of power at 106W for the entire system:

Peak System Power Consumption in Watts

Then, we fired up Doom 3 and ran it at 800x600 (High Quality) in order to get a peak power reading for the system.

Interestingly enough, other than the integrated graphics solution, the 6200 is the lowest power card here - drawing even less power than the X300, but that is to be expected given that the X300 runs at a 25MHz higher clock speed.

It's also interesting to note that there's no difference in power consumption between the 128-bit and 64-bit X300 cards. The performance comparison is a completely different story, however.

Peak System Power Consumption in Watts

In the end, none of these cards eat up too much power, with the X700 clearly leading the pack at 10% greater system power consumption than the 6600. It will be interesting to find out if there's any correlation here between power consumption and performance.

The Test   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

44 Comments - Last by nvdm24, 1878 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by NesuD, 1947 days ago
there is some kind of error concerning your max power graph and this statement.

"other than the integrated graphics solution, the 6200 is the lowest power card here - drawing even less power than the X300,"

the graph clearly shows the 6200 drawing 117 watts while the x300 is shown drawing 110 watts. Just thought i would point that out.

Reply
No Subject by projecteda, 1947 days ago
x700 > 9800 Pro?

Reply
No Subject by Lonyo, 1947 days ago
Why is there no X300 in the CS: Source stress test?
It seems oddly missing, and with no comment as to why...

Reply
No Subject by MemberSince97, 1947 days ago
OT, I wonder about the outcome for us 6800 owners and the VP... Nvidia screamed this new feature to us and I bought it . Will this end in a class action,or perhaps some kind of voucher for people that bought the 6800 specifically for this highly touted feature....

Reply
No Subject by teng029, 1947 days ago
"For example, the GeForce 6600 is supposed to have a street price of $149, but currently, it's selling for closer to $170. So, as the pricing changes, so does our recommendation."

i have yet to see the 6600 anywhere. pricewatch only lists two aopen cards (both well over 200.00) it and newegg doesn't carry it. i'm curious as to where he got the 170.00 street price.


Reply
No Subject by ViRGE, 1947 days ago
Unless LucasArts changes something Anand, you may want to drop the Battlefront test. With multiplayer, the framerate is locked to the tick rate(usually 20FPS), so its performance is nearly irrelivant.

PS #1, he's talking about the full load graph, not the idle graph

Reply
No Subject by ROcHE, 1947 days ago
How would a 9800 Pro do against these card?

Reply
No Subject by AlphaFox, 1947 days ago
if you ask me, all these low end cards are stupid if you have a PCIe motherboard.. who the heck would get one of these crappy cards if they spent all the money for a brand new PCIe computer??? these cards would be perfect for AGP as they are now going to start to be lower end..

Reply
No Subject by DAPUNISHER, 1947 days ago
Thanks Anand! I've been on about the PVP problems with nV40 for months now, and have become increasing fustrated with the lack of information and/or progress by nV. Now that a major site is pursuing this with vigor I can at least take comfort in the knowledge that answers will be forthcoming one way or another!

Again, thanks for making this issue a priority and emphatically stating you will get more information for us. It's nV vs Anand so "Rumble young man! Rumble!" :-)

Reply
No Subject by dragonic, 1947 days ago
#6 Why would they drop it because the multiplayer framerate is locked? They benchmark using the single player, not the multiplayer

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 5

Deliver Rich Interactive Experiences
Engage more viewers with Adobe® Flash® Media Interactive Server 3.5
Vinpower DVD Duplicator
Manufacturer of quality disc duplication systems. Drop shipping available. Become a reseller today.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more Video Card Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information