Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Sun’s T2000 “Coolthreads” Server: First Impressions and Experiences
Sun’s T2000 “Coolthreads” Server: First Impressions and Experiences
Date: March 24th, 2006
Topic: IT Computing
Manufacturer: Sun Microsystems
Author: Johan De Gelas
 
 

Introduction

The Sun T2000 server, based on the UltraSparc T1 CPU, sparks our curiosity. For years, x86 servers have been gobbling up the server market share fast, forcing the RISC vendors – who don’t have the same economies of scale – to retreat to niche markets. First, the low end market was completely overrun, and right now, Xeons and Opterons are on their way to dominate the mid-range market too.

It is, however, clear from reading the T2000 server documentation that Sun hopes that the T1 CPU and the T2000 server can turn the x86 tide. The documentation files contain many references to the x86 competition, which indicate how the T1 outshines the x86 competition.

No, this is not a server and Sparc CPU that must keep Sun’s current position among the RISC vendors safe. This is an ambitious effort to take back some of the lost server market.

Indeed, since the introduction of the new UltraSparc T1, Sun is bursting with ambition:

“The Sun Fire T2000 Server marks the dawn of a new era in network computing, by allowing customers to break through limitations of capacity, space and cooling.”

If Sun’s own benchmarks are accurate, it is no exaggeration to call the T2000 a server with a revolutionary CPU. Sun claims that this 72 W eight core, 32-thread CPU can outperform the power hungry (200-400W) quad IBM Power 5, Intel Xeon and the AMD Opteron machines in many server applications.

However, there is no substitute for independent benchmarks. So, we proudly present you our first experiences with Sun’s T2000. Note the phrase, “first experiences”, as there is still a lot of benchmarking going on in our labs. We are only scratching the surface in the first part, but rest assured that we’ll show you much more soon.

In this first part of our T2000 review, we look at the T2000 as a heavy Solaris, Apache, MySQL and PHP web server or SAMP web server. We also take a look at the performance of a single T1 Sparc core, to get an idea of how powerful each individual core is.

We are working on a JSP web server benchmark and there are several database benchmarks also in progress.

Introducing the T2000 server   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

26 Comments - Last by Zoomer, 1321 days ago
Username:
Password:
Great review... by JackPack, 1338 days ago
Pleasant to read as usual, Johan.

BTW, are they letting you keep the T2000?
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jonathan?entry=niagara_benchmarks

Reply
RE: Great review... by PandaBear, 1338 days ago
In terms of Branded server it is a good price, but as benchmark have shown, a Dual Opteron running Linux both perform better and use less power. I think people who buy these class of server want support and service (and build quality) and in that case Sun certain would win the whitebox builder no matter how good a Dual Opteron is.

Nonetheless it is a good product, for the one who demand this kind of quality. Now Intel's solution really looks bad.

Reply
RE: Great review... by Calin, 1338 days ago
I don't know what you are talking about - if you would up the memory on the Opteron HE (2CPU of 2 cores) to 32GB, the power consumption would be almost the same (assuming 6W per 4GB of RAM, it would be at 234W. Close enough to be considered equal, I'd say.
Also, wouldn't populating all the possible memory slots on the Opteron decrease a bit its performance? I don't know about Opteron, but Athlon64 decrease its command rate (Help, Johan! :) ) when working with all the memory channels filled.
I agree about the better performance of the Opteron server, but regarding the power use, it is the same as the Sun's recent offering. Maybe the introduction of the DDR2 Opterons would change the power envelope, but until then, the T1 might have some aces up its sleeve

Reply
RE: Great review... by JohanAnandtech, 1338 days ago
You must calculate about 4-5 Watt per 2 GB Dimm. Based on the measurements I did and slightly guessing I think a 32 GB Opteron HE with 32 GB would definitely consume more than The T2000 as also have to count a few Watts per memory channel.

Indeed, fully loaded DIMM channels will probably throttle back to lower speeds. I am not sure about Command rate though (BTW, it increases on the Athlon 64 not decreases :-), as it is possible less important with buffered DIMMs.

About performance, we still have to test a lot of scenario's (jsp, databases). The impression of the T2000 might still change.

Reply
RE: Great review... by Calin, 1337 days ago
I just took the difference measured between the 2xOpteron HE with 4 and 8 GB or RAM (192 and 198W), shown in the table on the last page. I know that even rounding errors might change that between 4 and 8W, but anyway, Opterons won't use less power than the T1.
Very interesting article, and I eagerly await for the sequels :D

Reply
RE: Great review... by Zoomer, 1321 days ago
2xx Opterons use rigistered ram, so its not an issue like with the 1xx 939s.

Reply
Graphs? by cosmotic, 1338 days ago
Why no graphs? It makes reading benchmarks SO much easier.

Reply
Last Paragraph by cosmotic, 1338 days ago
quote:

Last, but certainly least, Sun’s solid engineering has impressed us.


Did you mean certainly NOT least?

Reply
RE: Last Paragraph by JohanAnandtech, 1338 days ago
definitely ... Fixed. Just checking if you read it carefully :-)

Reply
div operation on the server.... by cxl, 1337 days ago
quote:


The very common ADD instruction is executed in one cycle, but it takes no less than 29 cycles to multiply and 104 to divide. Faster mul and division would have taken up much more die space and consumed much more power. Considering that those instructions are very rare in most server workloads, this is a pretty clever trade-off.


Actually, MOD operation can be very important for servers, as it is basis for any hashing operations, commonly used in many server applications. E.g. to identify variable in a script, interpreters routinely use hashtables.

114 cycles per MOD operation is performance disaster.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 3

We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Earth-Friendly Supermicro Servers
Energy Efficient Earth Friendly High-Density Reliable Servers At Lowest Prices.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 November 20, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 November 19, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
more System Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2009 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information