With Google Glass, one of the major barriers to adoption was just how glaringly obvious it was that you were wearing Google Glass. The display was a field sequential color LCoS with a simple projection system to make the display visible at a short distance away from the eye. Unfortunately, the problem with this system was that the display was completely obvious and wasn’t really integrated into traditional thin lens glasses. It was also pretty obvious when the display was active, as you could see light coming out of the LCoS array without getting uncomfortably close to the person wearing Glass.

Some of the other systems I’ve seen for projecting a display for smart glasses have also been pretty obvious to spot such as any of ODG’s smart glasses, although those aren’t really designed to be subtle in any way as they try to pack a full tablet of hardware into something head-worn. Sony’s SmartEyeGlass gets closer to something subtle, but it’s still glaringly obvious that you’re wearing something odd.

Zeiss identified this as an issue, and in response they created an internal team to try and make an optical system that resolves all of these issues. Their solution is what they’re now calling Smart Optics. This optical system takes a display mounted at the edge of the lens and can project it directly into the eye at an arbitrary position on the lens, with an arbitrary focus to either place the displayed image a short distance away from the eye (~2m), or even at infinity to create a true HUD.

In essence, this optical system relies upon total internal reflection and a Fresnel structure to transmit the light from the display through the lens into the eye. A complex prism design reflects the light from the display at the edge of the display into the lens, where the Fresnel structure then reflects the light in the lens out into the eye. The Fresnel structure is index-matched with the lens itself, which makes it almost invisible to the eye unless you have the right lighting to highlight the structure.

The entire design is made from injection-molded polycarbonate, which means that it’s capable of being mass-produced in a method similar to most current glasses. Based on discussions with those that worked on this project, the prism in particular was especially difficult to create as its shape is complex and voids and other defects would appear in the polycarbonate as it cooled. Zeiss also emphasized that their design was covered with over 250 patents to drive home the difficulty of making this optical system work.

Zeiss showed off an early prototype, which even at this stage was impressive as there was no visible translucency that could occlude vision and the projection worked flawlessly. Unfortunately, as the design is supposed to be made with a prescription for those that need one I couldn’t quite get the full experience as the corrective lenses that they had for the prototype weren’t quite strong enough for my eyes, but their rapid prototyping rig worked well and showed acceptable resolution and luminance.

I wasn’t really able to get much in the way of details regarding whether any devices with this optical system were imminent, but it sounds like Zeiss is working with partners that can put their optics to use. Based upon a lot of the discussions I’ve had with various people working with wearables it sounded like smart glasses were at least 5-10 years out, but with technologies like this I wouldn’t be too surprised to know that by the 7nm node that smart glasses using this technology will start to reach mass consumer adoption.

POST A COMMENT

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • nathanddrews - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    Very cool. As someone that regularly wears glasses, it is just about the only wearable I would consider buying. (except maybe a cyberbrain, but only after they cure Cyberbrain Sclerosis) Reply
  • Refuge - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    About to start wearing non-prescription glasses baby! :) Reply
  • JeffFlanagan - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    They're less obvious than Google glass, but it's still obvious that they're not glasses.

    The problem with Google glass wasn't that it looks goofy, it was that unstable people lose their minds when they see glasses with a camera on them, even in environments where cameras are common.
    Reply
  • melgross - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    Stable people properly don't want their conversations recorded by people who are wearing these things. It's far more obvious when someone is trying to do this with a phone.

    And yes, people do look doofy wearing these things. They think they look cool, but they don't.
    Reply
  • kingpotnoodle - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    Stable people don't automatically assume that everyone *with* a camera is actually *using* the camera to record them in particular; it's very arrogant to assume you're interesting enough for some random person wearing Glass to want to record you. If you're worried about being recorded as part of the general background then you've got serious problems entering any urban area.

    Yes it's a bit more obvious with a phone but it's not like that is the only other choice - there have been incognito cameras and audio recording equipment for a long time, how is it you think law enforcement perform covert surveillance or journalists collect their stories from unwilling subjects? They aren't using a GoPro strapped to their nose...
    Reply
  • Impulses - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    Not even sure how it's less obvious with a phone... All it takes is the right pocket positioning and you're in business for covert recording, with OIS no less. If you're that scared of being recorded you should probably just not leave home. Reply
  • Solandri - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    For those of you whose thinking is stuck in the 20th century, the vast majority of businesses you visit nowadays are recording you with surveillance cameras. The idea that you can prevent yourself from being recorded by stopping people from using Google Glass is pure ignorance. Reply
  • pjcamp - Friday, January 08, 2016 - link

    Leaving aside the stable/unstable debate, if you are out in public you have no legal expectation of privacy. Anybody can record anything you do. We're happy about that when they record cops, but the principle is no different for anyone else. Anything you're doing in a public place is clearly something you didn't mean to keep private. Reply
  • jospoortvliet - Saturday, January 09, 2016 - link

    Note that that is an US thing, in Europe, privacy laws and what's called 'portrait right' actually prohibit you from recording people and their property without their permission. You CAN take pictures of groups of people without permission, but you need to have at least four (or three, not sure) people in a picture or video at a time to be legally safe.

    Reality is even more complicated as press of course has additional rights (and these days, is a blogger press or not?) and 'public persons' like royalty and politicians aren't protected either.
    Reply
  • rtho782 - Saturday, January 09, 2016 - link

    That's not how it works in the UK. You can't publish their face online or whatever, but recording is fine. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now