Devil’s Canyon Review: Intel Core i7-4790K and i5-4690K
by Ian Cutress on July 11, 2014 10:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Devil's Canyon
- Haswell
- Overclocking
- i7
- i5
- 4790K
- 4690K
Discrete GPU Gaming
When comparing CPUs to APUs, one strength shown by team Blue in the past is the discrete GPU performance. However even when using dual graphics cards at a 1920x1080p resolution, we seem to have hit a wall where extra CPU performance does not necessarily translate to more frames per second. Our results below show little difference between the Haswell processors, and we need to go down to a 2.0 GHz i7 or a 3.5 GHz i3 CPU to see a significant drop in frame rates. The biggest benefit from overclocking seems to be F1 2013 minimum frame rates.
F1 2013


Bioshock Infinite


Tomb Raider


Sleeping Dogs


Company of Heroes 2


Battlefield 4










103 Comments
View All Comments
vastac13 - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link
Just when I'm about to go to bed... Good thing I checked 1 more time :D Happy reading folks! ReplyIketh - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link
I just hope Intel has another massive breakthrough in performance soon because rendering a 4K mp4 is gonna SUCKDon't need AMD for this case, the industry will drive it this time... Reply
ddriver - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link
Looks like desktop CPU performance is hitting a brick wall, the last 4 generations are barely incremental in performance. Could very well be the product of AMD ultimately failing to compete in the high end. I don't complain, this way I don't feel the urge to upgrade my 3770k. ReplyAntronman - Thursday, July 17, 2014 - link
IBM says silicon will end up limiting CPU capability, and are investigating alternatives. Replywrkingclass_hero - Sunday, July 13, 2014 - link
It's funny, I'm actually rendering a 4K mp4 right now! My 4.6 GHz 3930k looks like it's going to take a grand total of 21 hours to render it... and it's a 3 minute clip...But there are a lot of effects on it (stabilization, layers of videos, etc.) It also doesn't help that it is a two pass. Reply
ddriver - Monday, July 14, 2014 - link
What do you expect, throwing such a workload on a measly single cpu - such tasks are performed by rendering farms with thousands of quad socket machines. ReplyBraincruser - Sunday, July 13, 2014 - link
Rendering should be left to GPU cores in shaders. They scale much much better than cpu. ReplyMark-Benney - Thursday, August 14, 2014 - link
I wrote out a the Manderoot program on a Acorn Electron 32k, Back in the very early days. Took 48hrs to complete up on books with fan placed under it. Lol bet you were not even born when i first wrote program in Dos/Machine code/Pascal/BBC Basic. And still in nappys when I was overclocking a Intel Celron from 233mhz to a stable 24/7 367mhz ReplyCrystalBay - Monday, July 14, 2014 - link
Thanks Dr. Ian I love my Intel 4790K @ 4.8 Ghz , I also love Asus Z97 Deluxe . This isa the simplest way to OC in my 25 years of building PC's ... Screw it being AVX stable capitol BS never will be used instruction . Any modern chip fails at it anyway ... Go Devils ,go AMD Replysuperjim - Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - link
Intel hasn't made a good OCing chip since Sandy Bridge. Devil's Canyon just reinforces how good SB was. Nearly every i5 and i7 chip could hit 4.4 without issue with most at 4.6+ on a good air cooler. Raise your hand if you're still on SB only because there is nothing better... Reply