Gigabyte G1.Sniper M3 In The Box

Over the past 24 months, it has been somewhat exciting looking into the minds of manufacturers if you purely look into their bundles.  You can tell when a manufacturer is skimping on the extras to meet a lower price point – less SATA cables is a big giveaway, or not including a USB 3.0 bracket when two USB 3.0 headers are on board.  Gigabyte in the past usually split their bundles – anything below a UD5 is usually short of items, but UD5 and above (including the gaming ranges) has plenty to say for itself.

In the G1.Sniper M3 we get:

Rear IO Shield
Driver Disk
User Guide
Two Gigabyte Posters, Glossy
Six SATA Cables
Flexi SLI Bridge

Obviously the things that strike out are the posters.  I could image a freshman student in college putting these on the wall, but anything other than that and it seems a bit odd.  Being in my late twenties and married, I personally would not want to put these on the wall even if I was allowed to!

Gigabyte G1.Sniper M3 Overclocking

Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge.  For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.

Experience with Gigabyte G1.Sniper M3

Much like overclocking with the ASUS Maximus V Gene, we have three automatic overclock options to choose from in the operating system, along with BIOS options for manual overclocks.  The Gigabyte does not offer the automatic options in the BIOS, but they do have an additional OS mode to test for an overclock, dubbed ‘Automatic Tuning’.

For the automatic overclocks, the EasyTune6 software packed in plenty of voltage, using both a higher than stock fixed voltage with an offset.  As a result two of the three settings were stable, although the temperature under load was a cause for concern.  Due to our relatively bad CPU, the more extreme third setting and auto tuning were not able to perform.

Manual overclock options on the G1.Sniper 3 are split between those in ET6 (which are enabled at boot time when the software is loaded) or those that are set in the BIOS.  In the BIOS the options are spread around a few menus – the important ones of CPU multiplier, CPU voltage and Load Line Calibration are in all different menus to add to the confusion.  Despite this, overclock performance was reasonable, matching the ASUS MVG.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).  Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air. 

Automatic Overclock:

Using EasyTune6, CPU Level 1 attempts a 41x102 overclock (4182 MHz) and applies 1.295 volts to the CPU along with a +0.150 volt offset.  This setting was stable, giving 1.392 volts on the CPU at load, a score of 1519.50 in PovRay, and a peak temperature of 85ºC in OCCT.

CPU Level 2 attempts a 43x103 overclock (4429 MHz) and applies 1.300 + 0.150 volts on the CPU.  This setting was stable, giving 1.404 volts on the CPU at load, a score of 1615.00 in PovRay and a peak temperature of 86ºC in OCCT.

CPU Level 3 attempts a 45x104 overclock (4680 MHz) and applies 1.345 + 0.150 volts on the CPU.  This setting was not stable, giving 1.476 volts on the CPU at load, causing a memory error in PovRay and a BSOD in OCCT.

Auto Tuning in ET6 tries 43x105 (4515 MHz) at 1.400 volts, but this setting causes a BSOD on boot.

Manual Overclock:

Starting at our base settings of 4.0 GHz on the CPU and 1.100 volts, stability was tested to find the minimum stable voltage as the multiplier was increased.  Results are tabulated thus:

Gigabyte G1.Sniper M3 Overview, Visual Inspection, Board Features Test Setup, Power Consumption, POST Time
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ristogod - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    The Title of the article indicates you are comparing the G1.Sniper 3. Instead you use the G1.Sniper M3 in the review.
  • IanCutress - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    Thanks :) I've had the Sniper 3 on the brain. Though several pairs of eyes have read through and all missed the title.

    Ian
  • A5 - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    I wish manufacturers were more willing to send you cheaper mATX boards.

    Neither of these boards really feel like a good value compared to cheaper things in the same companies' lines. I guess the ROG makes some sense if you really need the wi-fi card + SLI/XFire (which loses you the Intel NIC as a useful feature...), but still.
  • IanCutress - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    It is something I am changing with Haswell. After initial launch reviews, I want to look at mATX. I've let the manufacturers know. That means gaming models and the cheaper end of the spectrum, perhaps in a couple of roundups focusing on price points or individually if people prefer the reviews that way.

    Ian
  • A5 - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    I personally like round-ups better due to the fact that they make the writer make explicit comparisons, but I understand that they're way more work for you :P

    Either way I'll probably upgrade before it would be published, but I appreciate the idea of increasing coverage in that segment.
  • DanNeely - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    I'm probably going to hold off until the USB3 fix refresh is out; so I should be able to read all the initial wave reviews before opening my wallet. My main box is going to be high OCed and water cooled; so I assume the boards I'm interested in will be in the initial flagship/near flagship review wave.
  • MrSpadge - Tuesday, May 14, 2013 - link

    Agreed - at these prices I wouldn't consider such mainboards at all.
  • just4U - Tuesday, May 14, 2013 - link

    A5, I don't see them as a good value compared to cheaper boards in the same company. My view has always been (with gaming matx) they are a great value when compared to more expensive boards in the same company. They pack a lot into these little boards /w features typically only seen in their highest end offerings.
  • GeorgeH - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    I had the Gene for about a week before replacing it. It was an awesome board, I just couldn't stand the coil whine. Sample size of 1, though, so did you notice any whine with your review sample?
  • IanCutress - Monday, May 13, 2013 - link

    No coil whine on my sample. I notice that some motherboards cause my testing PSUs to whine every now and again, especially in multi-GPU setups on gaming tests, but I can't say I had any with the Gene.

    Ian

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now