ASRock Z77 OC Formula In The Box

Top of the range boxes have to have the kit to match in order to make the package complete.  When buying something like the Murciélago on the box of the Z77 OC Formula, one might expect carpets, a tank of gas and a welcome pack as part of the deal when spending the big cash.  Motherboards by contrast vary wildly in the packaging, depending on bulk deals the manufacturer can obtain for the connectors, price margins, or special one-offs.  ASRock in the past have also varied, with some $150 packages containing all the loot, as well as most of the high end, whereas others not so much, especially in our last AMD review.  However, the Z77 OC Formula should get a nice bundle.

In the Z77 OC Formula, we get:

Murciélago themed box and User Guide
Driver CD
Rear IO Panel
OC Formula labeled cloth bag
Six SATA cables
Two 4-pin Molex to SATA power cables
3-Slot Rigid SLI Bridge
Front USB 3.0 Panel with integrated SSD holder
Rear USB 3.0 Bracket
10 Plastic Standoffs

I am always a fan of the USB 3.0 front panel put in the box, and having the other cables is an added bonus.  The cloth bag is a little odd, but it might help to contain all the extra things if you regularly modify the system, or for overclockers to keep vital things like OSes on USBs in.

The standoffs are a nice addition as well, for overclockers who do not want to cart around a large test bench to events:

If I were to critique one area, ASRock could have oriented the board more towards gamers and overclockers had they included their Game Blaster PCIe x1 module.  This would remove the audio codec on board, and offer a separate audio card with Creative Core3D audio and another Ethernet port.  Overclockers would not need to use it but gamers would all have at least one PCIe x1 port spare with any GPU combination.

ASRock Z77 OC Formula Overclocking

Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge.  For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.

Experience with ASRock Z77 OC Formula

Despite the lack of automatic overclock options for the OS, overall the overclocking using the Z77 OC Formula went really well.  The Nick Shih OC Profiles in the BIOS worked a charm up until my cooling limit, and using them as a basis for finding the voltage limits of the manual overclocks let me push an i7-3770K chip higher than I had ever done previously.

Overall, the Z77 OC Formula pushed our retail i7-3770K CPU sample to 4.9 GHz, limited only by the cooling at load, and to 5.2 GHz unloaded.  We also pushed a set of 2x4 GB 2666 C11 memory to 2800 C12 with a simple bump on the memory strap after XMP, peaked at an unloaded 2920 C12 and reached a peak BCLK of 110.3 overall.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).  Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air. 

Automatic Overclock:

The automatic overclock options are all found in the BIOS under ‘Nick Shih OC Profile’:

We have options from 3900 MHz to 5000 MHz in 100 MHz jumps.  Each option changes the BIOS to the corresponding settings which should account for the majority of processors on the market, though your mileage may vary depending on the quality of your CPU.

The results were as follows:

* Power Limits to 250W and Current Limit to 200A
** Power Limits to 300W and Current Limit to 250A / PWM Switching Frequency to 500 kHz
*** Long Power to 128 seconds and **

Each setting up to 4900 MHz passed both the stability tests, although OCCT reached 103ºC.  At that point I was unwilling to take it to 5000 MHz on the auto settings.

Manual Overclock:

Using the progression of the automatic overclock settings, I tailored the manual overclock settings to help push the higher MHz values.  As with our previous Z77 testing, I started at 1.100 volts on the CPU and at a 44x multiplier, but based on the Auto OC I placed the PWM Switching Frequency at 500 kHz, the Power Limits to 350W and the Current Limit to 300A.

The manual overclocking adventures follow roughly the same pattern as the automatic overclocking ones, except the biggest difference was at 4800 MHz, where we achieved stability at 1.275 V compared to 1.350 V in the automatic options.  4900 MHz is still our limit, hitting 100ºC at 1.375 V.

For memory overclocking, we used a G.Skill 2x4 GB 2666 C11 kit to push the limits.  For normal usage, we were able to boost the kit to 2800 C12 by applying XMP and adjusting the memory strap, nothing more.  Moving up to 2933 MHz though resulted in BIOS code 55 and no POST.

ASRock Z77 OC Formula Software Test Setup, Power Consumption, POST Time
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    They keep getting better.

    Their old board line ups had the most diverse setups and options with cpu sockets, chipsets, ram options, and the like, from P4 through core2 it was a wild assortment.
    They must have developed a lot of knowledge and attracted skill, and know we see it paying off.

    Are they not nearly or perhaps the most innovative.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    About a decade ago most of the smaller boutique enthusiast mobo companies started going under. All of the large but poorly regarded budget mobo makers were able to snap up full teams of people who knew how to design good boards. While it's taken time to spread their knowledge company wide there aren't any true garbage mobos on the market like there used to be and even the traditional bottom end of the market companies are generally turning out high quality parts.
  • Assimilator87 - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    Man, I really miss Abit.
  • IanCutress - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    A lot of Abit went to Bitfenix. Now we get cases like the Prodigy to play with :)
  • NichrolasHoult - Wednesday, January 16, 2013 - link

    Love my job, since I've been bringing in $5600… I sit at home, music playing while I work in front of my new iMac that I got now that I'm making it online(Click on menu Home)
    http://goo.gl/5AA22

    Happy New Year!
  • vwgtiron - Thursday, January 17, 2013 - link

    I use to love me some Soyo motherboards. Then towards the end quality went off the end for AMD support anyways.
  • Flunk - Thursday, January 17, 2013 - link

    I had a lot of trouble with a SOYO KT400 Dragon Ultra. That was a pricey board and it was so unstable (even at stock clocks) that I actually replaced it.. with an ABit AN7, which was such a good board that I got my 2500+ (1.83ghz) up to 2.4Ghz on a Thermaltake silent boost.

    Ah, memories. I miss those companies.

    I suppose ASUS is still around (and bigger than ever).
  • Flunk - Thursday, January 17, 2013 - link

    As a follow up, I would say that boards are a lot more homogeneous now. You can get a good board easily, for cheap, but sometimes the pricey ones are no better than the cheap ones.

    The Gigabyte z68x-ud3h-b3 I have now is a really lousy board for overclocking. You can be stable for a week, then one day it refuses to post unless you reset stock settings. At which point you can set the same overclock again and it works fine. Lousy junk.
  • charliem76 - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    I saw that line and raised an eyebrow. Is that something you weren't supposed to mention? Between the articles and the podcast, I don't recall hearing anything about that.

    I did theorize that one could cram two 2.5" platter drives into the space filled by one 3.5" drive and have room left over for a RAID controller to feed into one SATA port. Or with the space of an optical drive, even more 2.5" drives.
  • IanCutress - Tuesday, January 15, 2013 - link

    The Mushkin 960GB Chronos is reported to have two 480GB SSDs inside with a RAID 0, and the already tested OWC Mercury Electra does as well:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/6200/owc-mercury-ele...
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/6599/mushkin-announc...

    Ian

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now