Looking at the actual i850 Memory Controller Hub (MCH) you’ll see from the picture below that it looks more like a processor than an Intel chipset. 

The chipset also requires the presence of a heatsink, and the one on Intel’s D850GB Pentium 4 board is quite large in comparison to what we’re used to from chipset heatsinks. 


Click to Enlarge

As we mentioned in our latest Intel Roadmap article the biggest downside to the i850 chipset aside from its RDRAM only support is that the chipset is currently priced at close to twice as much as any other chipset.  While even the most expensive AMD 760 chipset is selling for $39 (North Bridge & South Bridge), the i850 (MCH + ICH2) is going for an expensive $75.  This is going to make Pentium 4 motherboards very expensive, you’re looking at a minimum of $200 for an i850 board. 

A new chip requires a new…Case & Power Supply?

Along with the Pentium 4 Intel is introducing support and a need for the new ATX 2.03 specification.  This specification basically makes room for the mounting holes for the Pentium 4’s heatsink retention mechanism in the case.  This unfortunately means that current cases, without modifying the motherboard tray, won’t work with the Pentium 4 with its heatsink attached.  If you’ve really got a lot of money invested in your case you can try and make your own mounting holes by lining up your motherboard and making the appropriate marks to drill through on the tray. 

The next big change is with the power supply.  The ATX 2.03 spec calls for an ATX12V power supply which supports the additional power connector required by i850 boards.  This additional +12V power connector allows for additional power to be supplied to the motherboard around the CPU.  With CPUs increasing in clock frequency and drawing more and more power, this helps to keep things stable in an area of the motherboard where current draw is at the highest levels. 

A new CPU requires a new chipset and a new bus Benchmarking the Pentium 4: A warning
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • g33k - Friday, May 27, 2005 - link

    First Post!!!!

    Seriously how come no one posted on these old articles? It was an interesting read on a bit of history. :)
  • microAmp - Thursday, November 17, 2005 - link

    quote:


    Seriously how come no one posted on these old articles? It was an interesting read on a bit of history. :)



    Maybe because there wasn't a comment section back then? /sarcasim
  • Rustey118 - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    10 years after first post. 15 years since article.

    Interesting piece of history. What ever happened to AMD's lead... :(.

    For 10 year in the future reader.

    I knew AMD would take the performance lead.
  • ruxandy - Sunday, March 28, 2021 - link

    @Rustey118: 6 years into the future reader here: Dayum, man! Can I borrow your crystall ball?
  • fortun83 - Wednesday, September 28, 2016 - link

    if you are looking for a great information the best place for holiday you can look at my blog here http://pesonabromo.com
  • BarbaraERenner - Monday, October 3, 2016 - link

    Many thanks for sharing! check this page: http://clashroyaleihack.com
  • Anonymous_87 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    this was the worst CPU by intel ever, much like Phenom launch in 2007, yet this is kind towards intel. a contrast to the phenom review. Its sad the bias.
  • Dr AB - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link

    On the contrary I think this was most interesting ... With much higher memory bandwith, sadly clock speeds were not as impressive in early released models.
  • AndrzejKalach - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Yeaa this history is awesome. AMD INTEL this companies needs to fight every time in the market.
    Good old intels CPUs! That is what i want.
    Check my blog: https://proudmedia.eu - In polish but this site is very good like this awesome post!
  • rosek7302 - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    hi the 50% higher clock speed very good
    http://crgenerere.com/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now