NVIDIA Launches GeForce GTX 650: GK107 With GDDR5
by Ryan Smith on September 13, 2012 9:35 AM EST
Alongside today’s launch of the GK106-based GeForce GTX 660, NVIDIA is also launching one other card: the GeForce GTX 650. In a nutshell, the GTX 650 is the long-awaited GDDR5 version of the GeForce GT 640, sporting higher clockspeeds and far more memory bandwidth than its DDR3-crippled predecessor.
| GTX 660 Ti | GTX 660 | GTX 650 | GT 640 | |
| Stream Processors | 1344 | 960 | 384 | 384 |
| Texture Units | 112 | 80 | 32 | 32 |
| ROPs | 24 | 24 | 16 | 16 |
| Core Clock | 915MHz | 980MHz | 1058MHz | 900MHz |
| Shader Clock | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Boost Clock | 980MHz | 1033MHz | N/A | N/A |
| Memory Clock | 6.008GHz GDDR5 | 6.008GHz GDDR5 | 5GHz GDDR5 | 1.782GHz DDR3 |
| Memory Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| VRAM | 2GB | 2GB | 1GB/2GB | 2GB |
| FP64 | 1/24 FP32 | 1/24 FP32 | 1/24 FP32 | 1/24 FP32 |
| TDP | 150W | 140W | 64W | 65W |
| GPU | GK104 | GK106 | GK107 | GK107 |
| Transistor Count | 3.5B | 2.54B | 1.3B | 1.3B |
| Manufacturing Process | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm |
| Launch Price | $299 | $229 | $109 | $99 |
The fact that NVIDIA launched a performance-uncompetitive part in the GT 640 back in June was unfortunate, but not unexpected given the fact that NVIDIA was facing an even more serious supply shortage than they are now. By our reckoning NVIDIA didn’t want to introduce a desktop GK107 part that would be in high demand when they needed those GK107 GPUs for their more profitable mobile lineup, hence the need to hold off on a GDDR5 GK107 desktop card until now.
But as the saying goes, it’s better late than never. The GTX 650 should handily outperform the GT 640 in virtually all scenarios, and based on what we’ve seen with past DDR3/GDDR5 cards we wouldn’t be surprised to see gaming performance at least double. Furthermore the GTX 650 is clocked some 158MHz (18%) higher than GT 640, which will only increase those performance gains.

Speaking of performance, one thing that caught our eye was that NVIDIA has set the TDP of the GTX 650 at 64W, 1 watt lower than the TDP of the GT 640. Typically we see GDDR5 cards sport a higher TDP thanks to the memory’s higher power consumption, and this would be further driven up by the fact that the GTX 650 is clocked higher than the GT 640. Given the fuzzy nature of NVIDIA’s TDP ratings it’s almost certain that the GTX 650 will draw more power than the GT 640, but it may end up being a very small difference if these TDP values are anywhere near accurate.


With that said, NVIDIA is equipping the GTX 650 with a 6pin PCIe power connector – strictly speaking it shouldn’t be necessary for stock operation, but since this is a GTX card NVIDIA has professed a concern over power consumption when overclocking. Of course with the already high core clock of the GTX 650 it remains to be seen just how far GTX 650 can be overclocked. At the very least the lack of a boost clock means that overclocking will be a much more straightforward endeavor.
Of course the $64,000 question right now is whether all of this will be enough to make GTX 650 competitive with AMD’s Radeon HD 7770 and 7750, and unfortunately that’s an answer we’re going to have to wait to get. Although both the GTX 650 and GTX 660 are launching today, NVIDIA didn’t want to have the GTX 650 steal the GTX 660’s time in the limelight, so the press was not sampled ahead of time. We’ll be looking at the GTX 650 in the coming week, at which point we should have an answer to that question.
| Summer 2012 GPU Pricing Comparison | |||||
| AMD | Price | NVIDIA | |||
| Radeon HD 7950 | $329 | ||||
| $299 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ||||
| Radeon HD 7870 | $249 | ||||
| $239 | GeForce GTX 660 | ||||
| Radeon HD 7850 | $199 | ||||
| Radeon HD 7770 | $109 | GeForce GTX 650 | |||
| Radeon HD 7750 | $99 | GeForce GT 640 | |||

22 Comments
View All Comments
Marlin1975 - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
Is that new pricing for the GT640? Most of the GT640s go for more then $99. Usuaully the prices shown are MSRP but the carsd can be had cheaper, rebate/sales/coupons/etc....Maybe they will drop and the GT650 can be had for around $100 or less after rebate? Reply
Marlin1975 - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
Actually looks like Newegg has the GT650's for $120-160 range. Over priced compared to the 7770 IMO ReplyStevoLincolnite - Sunday, September 16, 2012 - link
Waaaay Overpriced when compared to the old Radeon 5770's which you can buy for next to nothing these days and then overclock them, Amazing how much the mid range and low-end have stood still in terms of performance for the last couple of generations. ReplyRyan Smith - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
I've always used the median price of the 6 cheapest cards, which right now on Newegg puts the GT 640 at $99. There are some above that, but there are also some below that. Replynitrousoxide - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
I miss the days when that title only belongs to the big boss. Replygeekfool - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
You say that as if Nvidia´s naming tradition sometime made any sense at all...8800GT=9800GT=9800GTX=GTS250
8800GTX > 9800GTX < GTX280 (?!? where´s the highend 1 series?) < GTX 480 (ditto for 300 series) < GTX 580 < GTX 680
(won´t even talk about their codenames, which for reasons that doesn´t make any sense at, since they are not marketed, is refreshed every 2 "generations").
The worst part? AMD is doing something similar... Reply
Lerianis - Sunday, September 16, 2012 - link
I'm assuming that is meant to keep competitors from easily dissecting leaks of design information. Replyjtenorj - Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - link
The 100 and 300 series were oem parts based on g9x silicon. ReplyArbie - Monday, September 17, 2012 - link
I had an electric blue 440 with a six-pack. Now it's who has the most powerful graphics board. That's OK. Reply
silverblue - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link
Toms appear to have tested the 650 and it's about the same level as the 7750, but a good 20% or so behind the 7770. Still, different test environments and different test suites yield different test results. You can definitely say a couple of things though - the 650 is going to be quiet and frugal, and a big step up from the 450. Reply