$425.99
BenQ VW2420H Design and Interface
The BenQ VW2420H is a very simple design, but one without much adjustment available either. Your inputs are limited to HDMI, DVI, and D-Sub, with an audio input for the integrated speakers. There is no USB port for a hub or DisplayPort here. It does feature a tilt adjust with the stand, but there is no height adjustment or swivel, and there are no VESA mounting holes to allow for a stand with more adjustment range either.
Compared to a similarly non-adjustable TN panel that was just in, the BenQ was much easier to use since the edges of the panel would not wash out and discolor when looking at it from normal desktop distances. The lack of any adjustments other than tilt is something to pay attention to if you need those for your workspace. The audio input is potentially useful if you're not passing audio over HDMI and wish to use the integrated speakers, but the sound from the speakers is weak and tinny—just what you'd expect from small speakers in a monitor—but it will get the job done in a pinch. Adding a headphone output to the display would have been nice to make better use of the audio input/HDMI support.
| BenQ VW2420H | |
| Video Inputs | D-Sub, DVI-D, HDMI |
| Panel Type | A-MVA |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.276 mm |
| Colors | 16.7 million |
| Brightness | 250 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | 3,000:1 |
| Response Time | 25ms, 8ms (GtG) |
| Viewable Size | 24" |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| Viewing Angle | 178 horizontal/178 vertical |
| Backlight | LED Edge-lit |
| Power Consumption (operation) | 40W |
| Power Consumption (standby) | < 1W |
| Screen Treatment | |
| Height-Adjustable | No |
| Tilt | -5 - 15 degrees |
| Pivot | No |
| Swivel | No |
| VESA Wall Mounting | No |
| Dimensions w/ Base (WxHxD) | 22.85" x 17.08" x 7.42" |
| Weight | 8.6 lbs. |
| Additional Features | Headphone Jack |
| Limited Warranty | USA 1 Year |
| Accessories | D-Sub, HDMI Cables |
| Price | $330.00 |
This time BenQ has moved the controls for the OSD from the side of the monitor to the bottom of the display, which I found to be easier to work with. The change in orientation felt more natural for navigating the OSD, though I’m certain plenty of people had no issue using the previous setup either. The main issue is having both tabs horizontally across the top, and then a vertical menu selection. Instead of moving the buttons around, either designing the menus to be all vertically or horizontally oriented would make the UI easier to use.
The menu system has all the options that you likely need to set up the display. I used the User color mode since it allows for a custom color control. If you are setting up your display and plan on calibrating it, you should always use this control to calibrate the 100% white point to be as close to your target (typically D65) as possible. That gives the hardware LUTs the maximum flexibility to calibrate the display correctly.
hopefully they've changed 'wall-wart' manufactures.
Neither of them use wall-warts for power: perhaps it's a component supply issue.
Ditto for me also this would be a no buy just for this fact.
Goodjob Benq thanks for coming out.
It's extremely thin - which the review doesn't mention - and it uses a wall wart because of this.
It's a shame they didn't built the power supply and signal inputs into the base, as that would have been very tidy, instead cables hang out the back of the monitor (like any other) which rather lets down the point of creating a 'stylist monitor' in the first place, and losing VESA mounts, etc.
The picture quality is very good, for a consumer monitor, and far better than TN monitors in my opinion. Of course for serious gaming the TN monitors do have the fastest response times and the 3D options.
They reflect the light fixture directly into your eyes, incredibly annoying, I had to put tape on my last screen avoid the strain.
When are manufacturers going to understand buyers don't care about shiny just about functionality.
Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information
I think you may have meant "is not very good..."