• What
    is this?

    You've landed on the AMD Portal on AnandTech. This section is sponsored by AMD. It features a collection of all of our independent AMD content, as well as Tweets & News from AMD directly. AMD will also be running a couple of huge giveaways here so check back for those.

    PRESENTED BY

Introducing the AVADirect Compact Gaming PC

It's easy to build a powerful desktop if you take a big, beefy enclosure like SilverStone's FT-02 or the Thermaltake Level 10 GT and just fill it with the highest performance parts on the market, overclock them, and call it a day—and certainly we've seen our share of those. Taking all of that raw performance and shrinking it into a MicroATX case can be a little more difficult, though, especially when you're dissipating a cumulative TDP of at least 730 watts. Yet when we saw that AVADirect had produced another compact but incredibly high performance gaming desktop, we had to take a look. Gulftown may be on its way to bed soon with the advent of Sandy Bridge-E, but let's see if we can't give it one last hurrah in the process.

While this custom build isn't super compact, it's certainly a fair sight smaller than many of the gaming systems we've reviewed. It sure doesn't feel smaller when you carry it, though, and that may have something to do with the configuration.

AVADirect Compact Gaming PC Specifications
Chassis Lian Li PC-V354 Red
Processor Intel Core i7-990X overclocked to 4.4GHz
(spec: 6x3.46GHz, 32nm, 12MB L3, Turbo to 3.73GHz, 130W)
Motherboard ASUS Rampage III Gene Motherboard with X58 and ICH10R chipset
Memory 3x4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 (expandable to 48GB)
Graphics 2x AMD Radeon HD 6990 4GB GDDR5
(GIGABYTE GV-R699D5-4GD-B, Radeon HD 6990)
(2x1536 stream processors, 830MHz/5GHz Core/RAM, 256-bit memory bus)
Hard Drive(s) Intel 510 250GB SATA 6Gbps SSD
Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB SATA 6Gbps HDD
Optical Drive(s) HL-DT-ST BD-RE
Networking Intel 82567V-2 Gigabit Ethernet
Audio VIA VT2020 HD Audio
Speaker, mic, line-in, and surround jacks for 7.1 sound
Optical out
Front Side 2x USB 2.0 (3.0 connected to 2.0 header)
Mic and headphone jacks
SD card reader
Optical drive
Top -
Back Side 1x PS/2
7x USB 2.0
Optical out
6-pin FireWire
Gigabit ethernet
2x USB 3.0
Speaker, mic, line-in, and surround jacks for 7.1 sound
2x DVI-D
8x Mini-DisplayPort
Fan controllers
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Dimensions 9.65" x 13.6" x 16.54"
Weight 9.2 lbs (case only)
Extras Custom air cooling design
BD-RE
Overclocked CPU
Warranty 3-year limited parts and labor
Pricing Starts at $1,334
Priced as configured: $4,983

These days one of the big questions for boutiques, at least as far as I've heard, has really been this: "Gulftown or Sandy Bridge?" AnandTech readers are a fairly informed lot, so for them it's (almost) a no brainer: Sandy Bridge. So why is the AVADirect system we have in house Gulftown-based? The answer turns out to be a bit complicated.

I don't presume to speak for AVADirect or really any of the boutiques, but this is a question that I've fielded a couple of times, because it boils down to the two extra cores on Gulftown plus the X58's dual full 16x PCI Express 2.0 lanes. In print, both of these just look better to the average consumer than the "limitations" Sandy Bridge poses. You may be able to get an NF-200-equipped motherboard to at least checkbox the PCI Express limitation, but Sandy Bridge doesn't presently offer six executable cores. Even though virtually no games will take advantage of them (and in fact, generally speaking Sandy Bridge is the superior gaming CPU), it's still an important checkbox for the more-money-than-sense market.

As an aside, I do want to point out that while the Intel Core i7-2600K is preferable to the i7-990X in 90% of cases, there are the 10% of us that do video editing on our PCs. In those instances, the i7-990X's two additional cores can make a tremendous difference that Sandy Bridge needs a heavy overclock to make up.

For the rest of the system, I'll just say that I saw AVADirect sending a similar build out to other sites and had to bring the tiny monster in house for a review, if only to satisfy my own curiosity. In the process they gave me some options for how to configure it, and the only request I made was the CrossFired AMD Radeon HD 6990s. This is a configuration I just haven't had the opportunity to test yet, something I've rectified here.

Application and Futuremark Performance
POST A COMMENT

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alroys - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    The I7-990X has 6 cores, not 4 as stated in the specs. Reply
  • Taft12 - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    For added confusion, AMD has a chipset called 990X (that you would probably pair with a 6-core CPU, natch!) Reply
  • dragonsqrrl - Thursday, October 06, 2011 - link

    ...it's 990FX Reply
  • Dustin Sklavos - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    You'd think I'd've caught that since I actually have a 990X. Fixed! Reply
  • Menty - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    "AVADirect opts to set the top front fan as an intake and the bottom as an exhaust."

    Really, I don't understand why they did this. Surely this just creates a circular air pattern that cools, at most, the HDD cage? At the very least the bottom fan should have been the intake to try to force some air between the 6990s, and I can't help but feel this may have been a factor in the high GPU temps.

    Nice review though, and a scary amount of hardware crammed into such a small case o.O.
    Reply
  • marc1000 - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    i agree. in such a small case, it could be better to put as much cool air in as possible. with the bottom fan as intake too, it would force more cool air to the gpus, and the gpus would be the exhaust of the case.

    that is what i believe makes the 990x so cool: direct cold air intake over the cpu heatsink. this is a great idea.
    Reply
  • livingplasma - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    The 6990 has it's fan in the center and exhausts hot air from both ends, with the front bottom fan as intake there would be no direct path for it to exit and the GPU's would probably heat up even more than it did since it'd just be recirculating the hot air back to the GPU and PSU. The front top fan as intake was probably to cool at least the HDD and balance intake/exhaust airflow since a side intake fan could not be added, though maybe if you're handy enough a case bottom intake could be cut. Reply
  • marvdmartian - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    VERY pink, isn't it? Of course, this being "Breast Cancer Awareness Month", I guess that's appropriate (though not nearly as much fun as volunteering to squish a boob!).

    Oh, and the price point. I guess I just don't understand the passion of gamers to spend whatever's necessary for "the best system". $5000?? What is this, the early 90's again, when a ho-hum system would run you $1500+???
    Reply
  • TinyRK - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    "AVADirect's engineers were able to put together a smart, clean design..."

    So they can assemble a computer, but that doesn't make them engineers. OR are they actual engineers? You know, with a college-diploma and stuff? And if yes, in what?
    Reply
  • ggathagan - Tuesday, October 04, 2011 - link

    If you're older than 12, you are surely aware of the fact that the use of the term engineer has not been limited to those with genuine engineering degrees for quite some time.
    Blame the PC movement, the artifical self esteem movement or any number of marketing/management fads, but it is what it is.
    Garbagemen have been "Sanitation Engineers" for quite some time now.

    Why this is germane to the review escapes me, but at least you got to demonstrate your superior intellect, right?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now