by Anand Lal Shimpi on 8/23/2011 12:11:00 AM
Posted in CPUs , AMD , Intel , Sandy Bridge , Pentium , G850 , G840 , G620 , G620T
Buy the Intel BX80623G620 Pentium G620 Dual
Amazon
$69.99
Newegg
$69.99
TigerDirect
$68.30

The Processor Graphics Gaming Charts

How do these on-die GPUs compare to discrete offerings? This page has the data I presented on the previous one but in a comparison format to discrete GPUs:

Crysis: Warhead

Crysis: Warhead

Crysis: Warhead

Metro 2033

Metro 2033

Metro 2033

HAWX

HAWX

HAWX

Civilization 5

Civilization 5

Civilization 5

DiRT 2

DiRT 2

DiRT 2

Mass Effect 2

Mass Effect 2

Mass Effect 2

StarCraft II

StarCraft II

StarCraft II

Processor Graphics Performance Final Words
Intel should abandon the Pentium line by loeakaodas on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Why intel, why? Do you still ram these chips down our throats, they're so short of features that would be great for a cheap HTPC, but aren't all that attractive if you want to do anything but basic stuff with your machine.
loeakaodas
And this is aimed at those people that only want to do basic stuff with their machine.
Blaze-Senpai
RE: Intel should abandon the Pentium line by yankeeDDL on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
It still makes no sense: a Pentium 850 costs $98 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8... an A6-3650 costs $119 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
For $20 you get a real graphic cards which acelerated web browsing and video decoding, so it is actually very useful even for very basic systems.

I see no value, whatsoever, for entry-level Sandy Bridge, as they have a higher price/performance ratio than most AMD stuff.

Incidentally, while SB is undoubtedly the finest piece of CPU technology today, at these prices it makes sense only starting from the Core i5-2400, which, basically, outperforms nearly every AMD CPU.
yankeeDDL
RE: Intel should abandon the Pentium line by ET on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
A G620 plus a discrete low mid range ($70-80) GPU will give you a much better entry level gaming PC than an A6-3650, for not a lot more money. (For about the same price as an A8-3850, which will still be slower for gaming than the G620 system).
ET
RE: Intel should abandon the Pentium line by yankeeDDL on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
I am not convinced, but you might be right about the gaming rigs. I would argue that a cheap discrete graphic card would CrossFire nicely with tha A6, but that's not the point anyway.

I was talking, however, about entry-level systems.
There`s a "Best CPU for the money" update on Tom's hardware today: you can see that the G620 is not even in the picture, in favor of the Athlon II X3 and the G850.
If I was to play games rarely, I would much rather have an efficient but relatively powerful APU, than having to use an external graphic card: this way I wouldn't have to pay the electricity bill to have my GPU run a screensaver.
yankeeDDL
RE: Intel should abandon the Pentium line by Taft12 on Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Perhaps, but an Athlon II X3 450 plus the same $70-80 GPU would make for an even better entry level gaming PC at the same price.
Taft12
Not really. Many games still struggle to hit even two cores efficiently; few if any would benefit significantly from the third.
lowlymarine
For example see Grand Theft Auto IV PC edition. This game is unplayable on a Dual Core pc without a massive overclock, but runs fine on a slow tri or quad core. This was due to Xbox 360 having a tri-core processor (The 360 cpu is also a PowerPC design not x86 but that doesn't really matter.)
Roland00Address
great article Anand!
Samus
Despite the fact that these chips are so crappy, they will still outsell amd's cheaper alternative by a factor of at least 3 to 1. AMD could give you an A6-3650+FCH for the same price as a G850+chipset, and the G850 would still outsell it by 2:1.
Shadowmaster625
Latest from AnandTech