by Anand Lal Shimpi on 1/10/2011 2:25:00 PM
Posted in Storage , SSDs , Corsair , Performance Series 3 , CES 2011

Corsair has traditionally been a very conservative player in the SSD space. It started by selling Samsung based drives and eventually moved to Indilinx (although far later than its chief competitors). With SandForce Corsair narrowed the time to market gap, but it was still late. Not this time however.

As Dustin mentioned in his CES coverage, Corsair has a new drive that it announced at the show: the Performance Series 3 SSD. Based on the same Marvell controller as Micron’s C300/C400 but with what Corsair tells us is a different firmware, the P3 is supposed to be very quick.

Corsair had a pair of the 6Gbps drives on display at CES running on a Sandy Bridge platform. In RAID-0, the two 128GB P3 drives posted some impressive scores:

Peaking at 878MB/s reads and 430MB/s writes, assuming linear scaling that would put the speed of a single P3-128 drive at 439MB/s and 215MB/s for sequential reads and writes, respectively. Real world performance obviously depends on much more than just raw sequential read/write speed, but this is a good start.

The next wave of high end consumer SSDs will begin shipping this month, and I believe Corsair may be the first out the gate. Micron will follow shortly with its C400 and then we’ll likely see a third generation offering from Intel before eventually getting final hardware based on SandForce’s SF-2000 controllers in May.

Indilinx by geekfool on Monday, January 10, 2011
Any news on new Indilinx based drives? Havn't heard much about their new generation.
geekfool
I would like to know which of the Near-Term drives: Corsair P3, Micro C400, or Intel G3
is the fastest as a boot drive in the 60GB to 80GB range..
Tom80112
AFAIK the size wont matter with SSDs - it might even be faster with a bigger drive so you get a bigger so you have a wider bus to work with.
Frallan
Size does matter to speed, for the reason that often the larger drives can use more channels of the controller to write to more NAND devices. Companies often send out the largest (and therefore highest-performance) drives for review, leaving performance of the smaller (and more affordable) drives unknown.
strikeback03
Nice scores in RAID by Lifted on Monday, January 10, 2011
RAID is nice with the SSD's, but any word on Trim support for SSD's in RAID? Are we still waiting on RAID controllers for support? Is there a standard out there for them to follow?
Lifted
RE: Nice scores in RAID by probedb on Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Is TRIM actually necessary if the controllers have good garbage collection?
probedb
RE: Nice scores in RAID by Mr Perfect on Tuesday, January 11, 2011
I wouldn't want to run them without TRIM. TRIM allows the OS to communicate to the SSD if a block of data is valid and should be kept, or of is invalid and can be deleted. If I'm remembering correctly, a drive that is only doing garbage collection has no idea what is valid data and will reorganizing blocks whether the blocks are valid data or not. Both improve performance, but a GC drive could be moving around invalid blocks without knowing it, wasting write cycles for no good reason.
Mr Perfect
RE: Nice scores in RAID by Wiggy McShades on Thursday, January 13, 2011
garbage collection does exactly what trim does, but it only does it while the drive is idle. trim is just an on demand way of clearing data that has been deleted.
Wiggy McShades
Next Wave by alovell83 on Monday, January 10, 2011
I remember reading an article that said the Q1Y11 was the quarter to wait for if you are looking for SSDs, while if you needed something immediately the SSD being reviewed was worth a close look.

So, am I to take it that Q1 has turned into May? Please forgive my ignorance.
alovell83
RE: Next Wave by 7Enigma on Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Yup. With the Intel drives delayed and some of the other players also slow to release I think the time to buy would be Q2.
7Enigma
Latest from AnandTech