The Nehalem Preview: Intel Does It Again
by Anand Lal Shimpi on 6/5/2008 12:05:00 AM
Posted in CPUs

Two years ago in Taiwan at Computex 2006 Gary Key and I stayed up all night benchmarking the Core 2 Extreme X6800, the first Core micro-architecture (Conroe core) CPU we had laid our hands on. While Intel retroactively applied its tick-tock model to previous CPU generations, it was the Core micro-architecture and the Core 2 Duo in particular that kicked it all off.

At the end of last year we saw the first update to Core, the first post-Conroe "tick" if you will: Penryn. Penryn proved to be a nice upgrade to Conroe, reducing power consumption even further and giving a slight boost to performance. What Penryn didn't do however was shake the world the way Conroe did upon its launch in 2006.

 

After every tick however, comes a tock. While Penryn was a die shrink of an existing architecture, Nehalem is a brand new architecture built on the same 45nm process as Penryn. It's sort of a big deal, being the first tock after the incredibly successful Core 2 launch.

 
731M transistors, four cores, eight threads

It's like clockwork with Intel; around six months before the release of a new processor, it's sent over to Intel's partners so they may begin developing motherboards for the chip. It was true with Northwood, Prescott, Conroe, Penryn and now Nehalem. And plus, did you really expect, on the eve of the two year anniversary of our first Core 2 preview, a trip to Taiwan for Computex without benchmarks of Nehalem? In the words of Balki Bartokomous, don't be ridiculous :)


Yep, that's what you think it is

Without Intel's approval, supervision, blessing or even desire - we went ahead and snagged us a Nehalem (actually, two) and spent some time with them.

(Sorry guys, stop making interesting chips and we'll stop trying to get an early look at them :)...)

Not One Nehalem, but Two
lga 1366 by weihlmus on Friday, September 05, 2008
is it just me or does lga1366 bear more than apassing resemblance to amd's logo...

if only they could have crammed it into 1337 pins - "nehalem - the 1337 chip"
weihlmus
great movie by pringlep0 on Sunday, July 27, 2008
http://www.tvokay.com welcome every one. there are thousands of free movies for you stream and download!Have a nice day!thanks every baby support!
pringlep0
good news by pringlep0 on Sunday, July 27, 2008
it's completely watchable. but i feel http://www.tvokay.com better than this site!At http://www.tvokay.com can found thousands of free movies for you stream and download! so good!
pringlep0
Does Anyone Know? by Proteusza on Friday, July 11, 2008
I see that on the Daily Tech main page, the headline for this article now reads:
"June 5, 2008
Post date on AnandTech's Nehalem preview, before it was ripped and republished on Tom's Hardware"

Does anyone know what happened? I cant find the same article on Tomshardware, I presume they took it down.
Proteusza
overclocking? by xsilver on Friday, June 20, 2008
10 pages of comments and not one about the future of overclocking?

No more FSB = no more overclocking??????
Enthusiasts might jump ship if overclocking usually brings 20% extra performance, all amd have to do is come within 10% on performance and below on price?
xsilver
Unreal... by Akabeth on Thursday, June 19, 2008
Jebuzzz

This pretty much makes it pointless to purchase any high tier mobo and quad core today... It will be eclipsed in 6 months time...

Some of the numbers here make me wonder, "Are you f*cking kidding me?"
Akabeth
What version of windows? by JumpingJack on Friday, June 13, 2008
Anand, you could clear up some confusion if you could specify the version of windows you ran. The screen shots of some of your benchmarks show 64-bit Vista, yet your scores are inline with 32-bit Vista.... it makes a difference.
JumpingJack
RE: What version of windows? by JumpingJack on Friday, June 13, 2008
Nevermind, page 2 shows 32-bit Vista... makes sense now. You should becareful when posting stock photos, the Cinbench reflects 64-bit.
JumpingJack
Tick,Tock by barnierubble on Sunday, June 08, 2008
It appears to me that the Tick Tock cycle diagram is wrong.

Conroe shooked the world in the second half of 2006, Penryn came in the second half of 2007, now 2008 we have Nehalem on the horizon set for the second half of this year.

Now that is 2 years between new architectures with the intermediate year bringing a shrink derivative.

That is not what the diagram shows; bracketing shrink derivative and new architecture in a 2 year cycle is clearly not fitting the reality.

barnierubble
Nehalem IMC by mbf on Saturday, June 07, 2008
Will the new IMC support ECC RAM? And if so, what are the odds the consumer versions will too? I've had a bit of bad luck with memory errors in the past. Since then I swear by ECC memory, even though it costs me a bit of performance. :)
mbf
Latest from AnandTech