Benchmarking, GPUs, and Displays

Our motherboard benchmarks are changing as standardized application test suites like BAPCO's SYSMark 2007 and PC WorldBench 6.0 will be utilized to provide results that look at video creation, E-learning, 3D modeling, and office productivity applications. We will continue to utilize our in-house video/audio/productivity application benchmarks where applicable. Specific application benchmarks for networking, USB, storage, and audio performance will be provided in our in-depth chipset review roundups; otherwise we will reference to these results in first looks or single board reviews.

We are in the midst of a great lull at this time with game benchmarks as the top titles for 2007 such as Crysis, UT3, and Enemy Territory: Quake Wars will not be shipping until the fourth quarter (or "when it's done"), so our current benchmarks will have to suffice until the holiday season. Finally, depending upon the situation we will include synthetic benchmarks such as SuperPI and Futuremark to outline performance differences between stock and overclocked configurations.

One of the most common requests we have received is to see how an integrated graphics chipset on the typical µATX (commonly referred to as microATX or mATX) platform compares to a more performance-oriented graphics chipset designed for mainstream configurations. We're not trying to turn our µATX roundup into a graphics card shootout, but we decided to look at solutions that range in price from $60 to $125 to see just what type of performance and feature improvements an extra week's paycheck could buy.

In keeping with our silence is golden theme, our graphics cards consist of the Gigabyte 8600GT, MSI NX8600GTS, and the Sapphire HD 2400XT. We might even have time to throw in video quality results with our recently arrived Galaxy 8600GTS HDMI card that features (if you couldn't figure it out) native HDMI output. For those of you who wondering why an AMD HD 2600 card is not included, the reason is simple: passively cooled cards were not available in time. We have now received the MSI RX2600XT and will include video comparisons with this card and potentially another HD 2600 card in our G35 preview next month.

Overall, our primary focus is to compare video playback quality between these add-in products sporting the latest AVIVO and PureVideo technologies and the latest IGP chipsets from Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA. We will briefly touch on the quality differences in the motherboard test results but will provide an in-depth sidebar article on video quality and gaming performance.

Of course, if you are going to show video card and IGP performance/quality comparisons then one would assume we used a monitor capable of displaying those 1080P capabilities. In fact, we used three different monitors for our test results. Our primary desktop monitors included the 24" Acer AL2416WBsd for DVI and analog output testing along with the 24" Westinghouse L2410NM for HDMI output testing. Our choice for the all-encompassing multifunction monitor in our HTPC buildup is the 42" Westinghouse TX-42F430S (which replaces the older 42" Westinghouse LVM-42w2) that will be reviewed separately in the coming weeks.

Index Mass Storage
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mazen - Monday, August 27, 2007 - link

    If memory serves me well, we were supposed to see something last week!
  • Mikus42 - Thursday, August 16, 2007 - link

    You have great timing! I am researching components for a Micro ATX box.

    I have an older Shuttle SFF I am going to replace. (It is topped out on CPU speed.)

    For me, noise is a very important factor. My shuttle is on my desktop and it can be a tad noisy.
  • jonp - Thursday, August 9, 2007 - link

    The SG03 case is $160 (Newegg) w/o a power supply....ouch.
    The SX6 w/600w case is $112 (eCost).

    I would like to nominate the Foxconn TLM776-CN300C-02 w/300w at $40 (Newegg) as a more typical mini-tower case option.
    2 5.25" external -- one more than SG03; same as SX6.
    2 3.5" external -- one more than both SG03 and SX6.
    4 3.5" internal -- two more than both SG03 and SX6.
    expansion slots, front ports same for all three.
    power & reset buttons (SX6 yes; not sure if SG03 has reset button).
    1 80mm exhaust fan (SG03: 120mm intake, no exhaust; SX6 80mm intake, 120mm exhaust)
    Steel (SG03 Al; SX6 steel(?))

    The TLM776 power supply is a Channel Well unit. If that doesn't suit then it can be replaced with say a Seasonic S12 II 330watt at $60 for $100 total.
  • RamIt - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    I am so dissapointed by the numerous delays with this article, i will just pass it up when it finally materalizes. Way too many broken promises Gary.
    Peace out.
  • SanLouBlues - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    Since you're dipping your toes in, I'm dying to see some reviews of the PCHDTV cards for linux that claim ATSC/NTSC and unencrypted QAM support.
  • carver5678 - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    here are some suggestions for the review:

    (1) measure northbridge temps. *lots* of people are having problems with hot NBs. for example, see customer reviews on newegg product pages.

    (2) evaluate the ability of the boards to support passive cooling. can the scythe ninja fit on the motherboard? does the board rely on airflow from a cpu cooler to cool its northbridge? can it fit a scythe ninja, thermaright hr-05 NB heatsink, and thermaright hr-03 VGA heatsink, all at the same time, or do they conflict with each other?
  • lopri - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    I am 200% for the AT's (newer) stance on motherboard evaluations. Contrary to common myth, enthusiast market is HUGE. In various forums I often hear arguments like "Vendors make most money from OEM contracts", "They don't care about enthusiasts. They make money off server market", etc. - this can't be wrong enough. As computers are becoming a commodity, the number of enthusiasts is getting bigger, and vendors are very well aware of this fact. These days we observe even the most conservative and OEM-oriented companies attempt to jump in this growing market and have a piece.

    And there come the inevitable side-effects: Rushed-out (i.e. bug-fest) products, irrelevant blings, non-functional features, unacceptable compatibility, and poor longevity, etc.

    The #1 components in PC, of the said side-effects, are by far motherboards. I have been really put off by today's motherboards and for me it totally ruined the image of "Intel Stability". In all honesty, if I were to be responsible for an on-going support of an Intel based system, there would be only select a few 975X boards to choose from – of course in order to avoid potential hassles . It has been that bad, IMHO, and the ways vendors handle their mishaps are infuriating sometimes. Anyone who had to deal with the so-called "tech support" of famed motherboard manufacturers would know. Even under the best case of scenario, users have to deal with 2~3 weeks of downtime for replacement. (maybe except EVGA) For me, it's a total nonsense.

    If you buy a TV, you most likely expect it to work as advertised. Same for a DVD player, refrigerator, or anything that you spend your hard-earned cash on. Not so for a motherboard. It's been such a mystery for me (who happen to be dealing with many professionals and their works/products) how these Taiwanese mobo manufacturers can get away with the poor quality of products they dump in the market, and their shady business practices. When I purchase a product, I should be able to expect a 100% defect-free product, instead of praying on luck. I also don't want to see a almost same product as I bought, being sold with a slightly different name and fixed functions, not too long after my purchase.

    To a certain extent, I blame online journalist for their negligence. I do understand many are working with the manufacturers directly to get things right for us and that alone could be a reason why they often are sympathetic with the manufacturers. However, it is important to note that ultimately, reviewers should be in the buyer's shoes, and articles from reputable reviewers can have a huge effect on buyers' decisions. No matter how much work a mobo manufacturer put in, and no matter how much they listened to the reviewers, if the final products that end-users get are not up to the standard (read: 100% free from , reviewers should clearly state the shortcomings of the products at hand.

    Above said, I felt so refreshed reading from the first page of this article and would like to commend AT's courage. It's not that AT has been partial or unfair until today - it's the opposite. AT's motherboard reviews are probably the only motherboard reviews (and TechReport's) I've trusted to date and often times I don't even bother to read any other site's reviews. (they are waste of my time) I couldn't be happier with every single sentence that Gary wrote in a clear English. It read almost like a 'motherboard review manifesto 2007' :D and I couldn't agree more with every single word he stated.
  • SunLord - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    I sure as hell hope you have no plans to recommend the Mx5000 desktop to anyone. It's an unstable pile of crap. The keyboard at random times goes nuts and keys "stick" as you type. They don't stick down but they just keep repeating in windows cause the keyboard has dropped it's signal it's a bluetooth/site point problem. Oh andf can't forget the battery life gotta remember to always turn it off or you'll be replacing batteries every other week. The mouse is nice though.

    I'm buying a G15 and a rf wireless mouse to replace my month old Mx5000 because it's not worth the hassle of having to pull out and replug in the bt adapter every time the keyboard takes a dump
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    We have a MX5000 set at work and I have one at home. On the work set it has never dropped the connection, and we have replaced the batteries twice in 15 months (and it sees use for a couple hours a day). The only major problem is that the Logitech software can't handle switching between Linux and Windows, which is why on my home computer I didn't install the Logitech software. I use my home keyboard more, and still get 3 months or so out of decent rechargable batteries.
  • SunLord - Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - link

    I exchanged one set after a week and this one is still flacky i just moved to linux 3days ago and while bluetooth is useless it works perfectly. So I'd have to say it's all logitechs fault with there typical craptastic drivers

    On batteries no clue I burned through 8batteries in a month i bought the same day i got the keyboard at BB... Nice new duracells

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now