One of the big things to come out of Computex last year was our exclusive preview of a new project by AMD: being able to bring variable refresh rate technology through HDMI rather than via the more traditional method, DisplayPort. At the time, the demo seemed limited to a single monitor using a custom protocol between the standard GPU and a Realtek TCON with custom firmware to enable it. HDMI by default does not support the commands for a variable refresh rate, but the custom protocol additions made it possible with AMD wanting to move the standard in order to do so. At the time we were told that AMD wasn’t looking to produce the monitors needed to drive it, but wanted to open the standard up so any monitor manufacturer. In December, AMD announced that several manufacturers had stepped up to the plate, including Samsung, LG and Acer, with Samsung seeming to commit to more retail models than the others. Today’s announcement is a culmination of that effort.

The CF390 (23.5-inch and 27-inch) and CF591 (27-inch only) are two panels that differ primarily in screen size and IO capabilities, but offer a couple of distinct features: FreeSync-over-HDMI support and an 1800R curve. This means that the circle that defines the curvature of the panel has a radius of 1800 mm (70.866 inches), which is much tighter than other panels on the market (2700R or 3000R typical). These panels are a mix of high quality and FHD resolution, promoting a 3000:1 contrast ratio and 119% sRGB coverage on the CF591 models.

The monitors will also come with specific gaming modes, which adjusts picture conditions depending on the light/dark areas of content as well as attempting to minimize stuttering and tearing. This is alongside Samsung’s Eye Saver Mode, which reduces blue color intensity, and various flicker-free functionality.

The VA panels use a circular stand, they support 16.7 million colors (8-bit per channel), and have a rated brightness of 250 nits. The CF591 27-inch model is available in silver and white, whereas the CF390 models are black/glossy only. The CF591 also has DisplayPort, two HDMI 1.4 ports, D-Sub and audio in, whereas the CF390 models are solely D-Sub and HDMI. No word if either monitor has additional USB functionality.

These new monitors will be available in the US, Europe and Asia in March, with other regions coming in April. They require an AMD variable refresh rate capable graphics card to enable the mode. Currently Samsung has the refresh rate listed as '60 Hz', not stating the Freesync minimum or maximum refresh rates supported. We're looking into this, as well as intended MSRPs and will update if we get additional information.

As an interesting talking point, while the technical demo about FreeSync-over-HDMI was a poignant part of our Computex coverage, it needed that impetus from the panel manufacturers. When it works, it clearly is a value-add to certain models, without requiring DisplayPort or additional hardware as is the case of G-Sync. Ultimately the variable refresh rate technology market felt (subjectively) limited by the DisplayPort limitation, mainly because so many panels were already HDMI and HDMI has essentially become the in-home standard (whether that’s 1.4 or 2.0). Now that FreeSync has been ported over, assuming it all works out of the box and can be easily ported depending on controller firmware or the panel, it has the potential to become one of the dominant variable refresh rate implementations; especially if prices can reach parity with non variable refresh rate displays, meaning the only link in the chain is the GPU supporting the standard. With these curved panels, clearly they’re not casual purchases for sure, but it shows the technology moving in this direction. We expect to see more panels released this year with FreeSync-over-HDMI, and it will be interesting to see what markets the monitors will be focusing on.

Source: Samsung (via The Tech Report)

Related Reading

New HP Laptops to Feature AMD FreeSync
Samsung Launches Two FreeSync UHD Monitors
AMD Demonstrates FreeSync-over-HDMI Concept at Computex 2015
The AMD FreeSync Review
 

POST A COMMENT

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • Creig - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Unfortunately, even if a particular monitor has the capability to have its firmware updated to enable FreeSync over HDMI, I doubt many manufacturers will offer the upgrade. AFAIK, there have historically been very few updates available for computer monitors compared to say, motherboards or video cards.

    I wonder if AMD will push to have these custom protocols included in the next revision of the HDMI specification.
    Reply
  • EdgeOfDetroit - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I'm holding out for HDMI 2.1, confirmed! Haha Reply
  • extide - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Yeah there is next to zero chance of seeing new firmware pushed out for older monitors, the manufacturers want you to buy a new one with this feature instead, of course. Reply
  • mrvco - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I get why this is appealing in the ongoing FreeSync vs. G-Sync battle, but I don't see much point in enabling FreeSync over HDMI on existing FreeSync monitors... unless maybe... you really want to replace a perfectly good DisplayPort cable and use those speakers built in to your monitor? Reply
  • sabot00 - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    mrvco what are you talking about with the speakers? Reply
  • Murloc - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    hdmi transmits audio so if you want to use the integrated speakers you may want to use hdmi. Reply
  • Dr. Swag - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Display port can transmit audio too you know. I do it with my freelance monitor. I have headphones but when I feel like using the speakers I just unplug the headphones it works fine over dp. Reply
  • Dr. Swag - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Meant to say free sync not freelance stupid spell check. Reply
  • mrvco - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Aha. I had no idea, but it makes perfect sense. That blows up my "why would any one want to switch from DP to HDMI on existing hardware" theory. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, March 01, 2016 - link

    On the one hand, releasing this as a monitor seems pointless when we already have a competitive DisplayPort FreeSync monitor market. On the other hand, it's nice to see further evidence that it can be done without proprietary hardware in a more common cable design.

    Now if Samsung released it on their lineup of televisions or even released a firmware update for existing televisions, then they would get my attention!
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now