Camera Architecture

In the past it was the case that non flagship smartphones had to compromise the camera experience pretty severely. The SoCs didn't have image signal processors that could compete with flagship devices, and the sensors were generally pretty poor, with some not even supporting autofocus. Nowadays we see the camera sensors from the flagship phones of one or two years prior making their way into mid range devices, which has improved image quality dramatically. Even at $199, the Honor 5X ships with a very capable camera setup, and you can view the specifics of both the front and rear-facing sensors below.

  Huawei Honor 5X
Front Camera Resolution 5MP
Front Camera Sensor Omnivision OV5648
(1/4", 1.4µm)
Front Camera Focal Length 22mm equivalent
Front Camera Aperture f/2.0
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP
Rear Camera Sensor Sony IMX214
(1/3.06", 1.12µm)
Rear Camera Focal Length 28mm equivalent
Rear Camera Aperture f/2.0

Something interesting is the fact that the Honor 5X uses the same camera sensor arrangement as the OnePlus One. The front camera is Omnivision's OV5648 while the rear is Sony's IMX214 which we've also seen on the Moto G (2015) and the Nexus 6. As I said before, these mid range devices are shipping with very capable sensors. Unfortunately, image processing is often still an issue, which isn't helped by the fact that the ISPs in these mid range SoCs still lag behind those in flagships. Offering sufficiently high quality image processing would definitely put the Honor 5X ahead of the competition.

Still Image Testing

With the weather in the Canadian tundra having settled down a bit I've been able to return to my typical photo scenes rather than utilizing photos taken by Josh. With the Honor 5X using the same rear-facing camera as the Moto G and Nexus 6 those will be the most obvious points of comparison, although equivalently priced devices like the Zenfone 2 are included as well, as well as the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S6 Edge for flagship reference points. As always, the first test is taken with enough sunlight that all devices should be shooting at base ISO with a very quick shutter speed.

Daytime Photography

When I compare the Honor 5X's daylight image to other phones, as well as to how the scene looked to my eyes, there are two things that are immediately apparent. The first is the fact that Huawei's photo simply isn't as sharp as the one taken by the Moto G or the Nexus 6. The thin branches of the foliage are much blurrier, and this is most obvious with the tree on the right side of the frame which is very hazy and blurry on the Honor 5X, but fairly sharp on the other IMX214 devices. The second obvious observation is that the Honor 5X's white balance is skewed too far toward blue, with the entire photo having a colder appearance than it should. The Honor 5X's white balance actually makes the scene look more like what you'd see on a cloudy day, despite the fact that the sky is clear. This isn't necessarily a bad thing as far as photo quality goes, but it's definitely not true to how the scene originally looked.

One other issue with the Honor 5X's image is the heavy noise in the sky. The Zenfone 2 suffers from this as well, but the rest of the smartphones don't really have an issue with this.

When taking photos during the day the Honor 5X does alright, but it doesn't do as well as the Moto G which uses the same sensor. Huawei could definitely improve their camera processing to improve image quality when shooting during the day, and it's something they should be thinking about as they issue software updates to the Honor 5X.

Night Photography

In night time photography the Honor 5X struggles, which isn't uncommon for these mid range devices. Comparing to the Nexus 6 and Moto G reveals some interesting differences. The Nexus 6 definitely wins, although it's really showing its age by this point. The Honor 5X and Moto G handle their processing in two different ways. The Moto G has significant chroma noise which is very distracting, while the Honor 5X doesn't. However, the Moto G's image also retains more detail, while the Honor 5X's image looks blurrier and less detailed. This is due to Huawei's heavier noise reduction, which is removing the noise but removing details along with it. Ultimately, this is a trade off where no method is clearly better than the other, and in this case I would probably say that the Honor 5X is better due to how distracting chroma noise is, but other people may feel that the Honor 5X's less detailed image is the worse of the two.

Video Recording

The Honor 5X can record 1080p video at 30fps. This is pretty much par for the course with mid range Android phones, but this is a situation where differences in processing quality can result in enormous differences between devices that you would expect to perform similarly.

The 1080p30 video from the Honor 5X is encoded at 20Mbps using the H.264 Baseline profile. Huawei has something on their website talking about H.265 compression and it seems to be implying that the phone uses it for video, but there's absolutely no way to do so and the phone isn't capable of H.265 encoding in hardware anyway. It is capable of decoding HEVC streams, which is a feature shared among all Snapdragon 615 and 616 devices.

The quality of the Honor 5X's 1080p video is unfortunately not very good. It's just really blurry across the entire frame, and pretty shaky. One redeeming attribute is that the frame rate seems to be fairly stable, which can sometimes be a problem on low end and mid range smartphones when the exposure changes or you move quickly during a video.

One other feature Huawei advertises is the ability to do slow-mo video recording. I didn't even bother putting a video sample for this because the feature just isn't worth using. The videos are recorded at 640x480 at 120fps, but I'm fairly sure that it's really a video shot at a lower frame rate that is being interpolated to 120fps. When played back at normal speed it doesn't look as fluid as 120fps video, and when you slow it down the gaps between frames are really large and the video becomes quite stuttery. This is on top of the low resolution and bitrate, and while I applaud Huawei for trying to bring this feature to mid range phones, the ISP is just not up to the task.

Battery Life and Charge Time Software and UI Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • londedoganet - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    No LTE Web Browsing battery test? Are the bands incompatible?
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I was having difficulties getting sufficient reception due to the weather conditions. The phone has to be placed in a place where it's vulnerable to snow and rain. I'll try to run it at a later point if it's possible.
  • tipoo - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Looks like a fair jump over the Moto G for around the same price, nice to see this space heating up. I think the midrange is honestly where the excitement is now, the high end has gotten boring.

    Though, neither this nor the G are close to taking down the Zenfone 2 for GPU performance yet in the same price category, impressively. I'm unsure if the early issues with the 2 were worked out (battery life, screen color shifting to save power), but for gaming that has both trumped. I'd like to see the Zenfone 3.
  • blanarahul - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    If wonder what the real life performance /power differences are between S610 and S615 considering that the extra four cores barely make any difference. Also S610 should be a little cheaper as well.
  • usama_ah - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I purchased one from Amazon the day it was released for my mom. Prior to that she was using my OG Moto X on AT&T in Chicago.

    She's extremely pleased with the phone. There was a slight learning curve going from a near stock launcher to this OS but she loves the big, bright screen and the fingerprint unlock. Camera is good enough for her too. She has noticed the slight UI jankyness while moving about but that's not something she cares about. She uses WhatsApp with family and gets a LOT of pictures and videos so now she doesn't have to delete to make room because she can move them to a microSD card (I set it up to be one button transfer to microSD since WhatsApp doesn't let you default media there). She loves the battery life, and usually charges every other day. She loves the build quality and color (we got her the gold). Works well on AT&T LTE in Chicago and soon she'll be running dual SIM when she goes overseas.

    Overall I'm very happy with the purchase, and more importantly she is. It was hard for me to not get her the Moto G but I think we made the right choice, for her. If I was to recommend one to a friend I might still recommend the Moto G first because of customization and flexibility, closer to stock interface. Maybe this year's G will also have a fingerprint reader, we'll see.
  • zeeBomb - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Phone doesn't surprise me due to all the phones I looked at MWC, LOL.
    Brandon, if you get the chance, review the Alcatel Idol 4!
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    So it barely beats year old Motorola and Asus phones that sell for the same price. We are impressed because it has a little aluminum? I'd rather a plastic phone with Marshmallow, a better LTE radio, faster ram, and more NAND. This seems like year old specs at the launch, which shouldn't impress anyone.
  • formerglory - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Fun fact: the Honor 5X's screen *doesn't* have an oleophobic covering, thus the screen protector that comes with it (that has a coating). Ideally, you're not supposed to remove it, or else suffer the wrath of a constantly fingerprint-covered screen.
  • revanchrist - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    This is a low end phone priced at mid range price. Man, look at the Snapdragon 616, it's manufactured on 28nm LP. How old was that process already? I'll consider the 28nm HPM Snapdragon 650 and 652 and even the 14nm LPP Snapdragon 625 as mid range, but not the Snapdragon 615 and 616 thanks.
  • beginner99 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    My though as well. I don't see the midrange except in price. A53's are too slow for midrange and if you really use those, take ones made on 14/16 nm and hence better battery life. The charts clearly show you are better off with a 2 year old flagship.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now