Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
OCZ Introduces DDR3-1800
OCZ Introduces DDR3-1800
Date: July 31st, 2007
Topic: Memory
Manufacturer: OCZ Technology
Author: Wesley Fink
Buy the OCZ OCZ3P18002GK Platinum 2GB Edition
Blank
 Amazon $73.12
 Buy.com $103.72
 ZipZoomFly $65.99
20.00 rebate
 
 

Bandwidth and Memory Scaling

As you saw in the overclocking graph on page 5, the OCZ DDR3-1800 reached DDR3-2040. This is slightly higher than the Super Talent which reached DDR3-2008 and it is the highest memory speed we have yet reached with DDR3. To better understand memory performance at speeds from DDR3-800 to DDR3-2040 we compared standard or buffered bandwidth on the OCZ PC3-14400 at all standard speeds. The processor in each case was running at 3.0GHz as detailed in the memory test configuration on page 3. The OCZ bandwidth was compared to all DDR3 memory we have tested to date.

Click to enlarge

At DDR3-800 and 1066 the Elpida LL based Kingston is the best performer in the standard Sandra bandwidth test. However, at 1333 the lead shifts to the OCZ DDR3-1800 where it remains through the highest speed that could be reached with DDR3. It is interesting that the Elpida is very efficient in DDR2 overlap speeds but then loses steam at higher DDR3-only frequencies.

The new Z9 DDR3 memory owns the benchmarks from 1333 on. The Super Talent set new timing records and the OCZ extends that a bit further. The aggressive OCZ binning allows slightly faster timings at all speeds from 1333 to 2000+. In fact we were more than surprised that timings of 5-5-4-12 were stable with the OCZ PC3-14400 at 1333 speed. The Micron Z9 memory chips achieve high speeds and particularly tight timings on the OCZ memory. The TEAM memory is also based on Micron Z9 chips, and it competes well in the range it covers. Unfortunately, the binning on the TEAM has produced a memory that tops out about 100 MHz lower than the best Z9 DIMMs.

We also test memory with buffering schemes like MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, etc, turned off. While these features do provide apparent improved bandwidth, the unbuffered bandwidth tends to correlate better with real-world gaming and application performance. Unbuffered performance does not always follow the patterns of buffered memory performance.

Click to enlarge

Unbuffered results show the same basic pattern as buffered results. At 800, 1066, and now 1333 speed the best unbuffered bandwidth is achieved with the Kingston LL memory. 1333 is neck and neck with the OCZ DDR3-1800 being reviewed. Above 1333 OCZ and other Micron Z9-based memory are the best performers. If you are looking for raw speed and performance it is increasingly clear that DIMMs based on Micron Z9 memory chips are the fastest DDR3 you can currently buy. There will still be variations based on the DIMM Manufacturers' experience and expertise in binning, PCB construction, and SPD programming.

Gaming   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

27 Comments - Last by elivebuypp, 3 days ago
Username:
Password:
DDR3 ? by yyrkoon, 844 days ago
Does anyone even sell a DDR3 capable motherboard yet ? If so, is anyone even using DDR3 ? Personally, I think latencies need to come down, Prices need to come down,etc. Memory companies are *claiming* they are taking a beating in the market for DDR2 (claiming all time low, and losing money . . .).Personally, I think you reap what you soe, and they got what they deserved for their early market prices.

Anyhow, short and skinny, I think *we* all need to take things slowly this time around, OEMS, buyers, and reviewers . . .

Reply
RE: DDR3 ? by yyrkoon, 844 days ago
By the way, when I asked if anyone is even making a DDR3 motherboard yet, I was pretty much joking. Obviously if you're testing it, there has to be some form of a platform availible.

You know, I cannot help but think that DDR2 was not quite 'finished' yet, and I do not understand the *need* for DDR3(unless OEMs are looking to rape our wallets again . . .). Of course, if 'Joe blow enthusiast' HAS to HAVE DDR3 memory because it gives him/her an extra 4-13 FPS in an outdated game at 2-3x the cost of DDR2 . . . well... lets just say that I expect that OCZ, Geil, and the rest would be more than happy to keep you poorer ;)

Some of us actually like to upgrade smart, using as many parts from older machines as possible to save money for other things. This sort of marketing strategy makes it hard on us who would like to do so while keeping our system upgraded once a year or so. I just got over having to buy memory, CPU, and a motherboard the last 'technolgy' advance, and I really do not wish to repeat the process.

Reply
RE: DDR3 ? by asliarun, 844 days ago
Man, I never understand viewpoints such as yours. This is a technology article on the latest DDR3 advancement, and is not marketing propoganda urging you to go out and buy it NOW. Intel's latest CPU chipsets (P35/P38, IIRC) all support DDR3 (along with DDR2), so it's not like DDR3 is exactly vaporware. Only AMD is not supporting DDR3 right now because firstly, they will need to upgrade their integrated uncore memory controller, and secondly, they tend support upcoming technologies much later than Intel. Furthermore, DDR3 is definitely the future as it has much more headroom than DDR2, and is designed to work at lower voltages.

In any case, my point is that we're discussing a new memory standard technology which is already in the market and is slowly being adopted. Initially, it WILL be highly priced like any other technology until volume manufacturing kicks in. However, if you are a price sensitive customer instead of a "Joe blow enthusiast" (frankly, like most of us), no one is forcing you to replace your RAM with DDR3 TODAY, least of all this AT article. Your logic of not adopting DDR3 simply because it is initially expensive and because it only gives "4-13fps increase" is however, absurd. By the same token, there is no need for ANY technology improvement, especially those that *only* result in an incremental improvement.

As a footnote, you should be grateful for all the "Joe blow enthusiasts" in this world instead of heaping scorn on them. All said and done, you and I ARE freeloading on him, as he's the one who's financing our cut rate technology purchases.

Reply
RE: DDR3 ? by GlassHouse69, 843 days ago
Oh you think so?

hm.... i wonder how much Anandtech/daily got for reviewing this... hm.....



Reply
jordan shoes$32,Ugg boots$50,handbag(lv,gucci,coach)$35,jean$30,free shipping by elivebuypp, 3 days ago
http://www.elivebuy.com

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

UGG BOOT $50

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

FREE sHIPPING
http://www.elivebuy.com

Reply
Power consumption by Lonyo, 844 days ago
Any chances of a power consumption comparison between DDR2 and DDR3?
DDR3 is supposed to run at a lower voltage, so in theory it might use a little less power. Would be interesting to see if there is any difference (DDR2/3-800 would probably be best, since that's a standard speed for both).

Reply
DDR2 1066 4GB? by indeed, 844 days ago
Is there any chance that we'll be seeing DDR2 1066 4GB packs with 2 modules any time soon?

Reply
Testing method... Much improved by YellowWing, 843 days ago
Thanks for keeping the CPU clock constant this time. We get the chance to see what the memory is adding without having to factor out the CPU clock changes. I look forward to new straps for a completely even test environment.

Reply
RE: Testing method... Much improved by Wesley Fink, 843 days ago
You're welcome. All of your suggestions on making this a better memory test platform were very helpful. We need 1600 and 2000 memory straps right now with DDR3 boards. I sincerely doubt that it even occurred to JEDEC and motherboard makers that we would be caring about DDR3-2000 this early in the development of DDR3. The memory speed development of DDR2 seems almost glacial by comparison.

Reply
RE: Testing method... Much improved by MadBoris, 843 days ago
Hey wesley,

I also wanted to say thanks for the more apples to apples comparison with DDR2. I think this is really of utmost importance to most folks before we start comparing DDR3 among other DDR3 modules. As exciting as DDR3 is as a technology we still want to see the real world performance improvement over DDR2 to justify for ourselves any price increase with new purchases, let alone the three fold price increase. If I get 3 to 4 percent less performance for 1/3 the price then that is a good purchasing decision for me. All new memory suffers from these teething pains, I just wanted them quantifiable.

In further search for the real world comparison and the true advantages that DDR3 brings at it's current highest speeds comared to DDR2 at it's highest speeds(1066 in this case), I did have to flip back and forth between pages 4 and 7 several times. With page 4 using a 2.66 GHZ CPU clock frequency and page 7 using 3GHZ, a direct comparison in the benchmark numbers themselves wasn't possible due to the 10% CPU difference. Initially page 7 scores looked much better than page 4 until I factored in the 10% CPU difference. It took a few minutes to come to a method of distinguishing the real world advantage of DDR3 running at it's highest speeds, compared to DDR2 at it's higher speeds.

basically, I came to the conclusion if 1333 is where DDR3 starts to get it's legs and surpass DDR2(as you state on page 4). Page 4 doesn't actually show the 1333 speeds of DDR2 in the chart (as none exists), but you can see there is a minor advantage in the two games emerging over the previous chart with 1066 DDR2. So then comparing DDR3 at 1333 to DDR3 at highest speeds on page 7 gives me a rough estimate of the "real world" performance of DDR3 at it's highest speed over what DDR2 has it's highest speeds (with an additional 1% tossed in as advantage over 1066 ddr2). All this extrapolation was necessary due to the 10% CPU difference. Not complaing, just stating a fact in trying to get to the real world benefits if I was going to by a platform today, and having to justify the cost/performance ratio.

In the end, the real world benefit of DDR3 at it's highest speeds, compared to a P35 running DDR2 at it's highest speeds(both with fastest timings using 1333 as the cutoff where DDR2 is left behind) came out to about 3 - 5 percent real world gaming benefit in benchmarks of Far Cry and Quake 4. Obviously the synthetics showed much more, but they always do. All that of course is based on the reality that 1333 is where the performance shift takes place with the current fastest DDR2 and fastest DDR3, which is what I was after. To me, 3 - 5 percent definitely doesn't justify 3 times the cost of the memory yet, especially if a board supports both DDR2 and DDR3.

Anyway, thanks for making an apples to apples comparison more possible in this review, even though not exact, I could extrapolate the necessary info I wanted. I'm sure as latency continues to lower on DDR3, than all this additional frequency will be worth something beyond the current meager benefits over DDR2 at 1066.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 3

We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System - Free Trial
Collaborate and Develop Apps Faster. Get the Tools & Processes That Help Teams Work Effectively.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
SAP Risk and Compliance Resources
Register to Access SAP's Risk Management Resource Center today.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 November 20, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 November 19, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
more Memory Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2009 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information