Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Linux and EM64T; Intel's 64-bit Suggestion
Linux and EM64T; Intel's 64-bit Suggestion
Date: August 9th, 2004
Topic: Linux
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Kristopher Kubicki
Buy the Intel BX80574E5450A E5450 Xeon DP
Blank
 Newegg $986.99
 Amazon $986.99
 Buy.com $972.99
 
 


Conclusions

Although the Athlon 64 3500+ and the Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T processors were not necessarily designed to compete against each other, we found that comparing the two CPUs was more appropriate than anticipated, particularly in the light of Intel's newest move to bring EM64T to the Pentium 4 line. Once we obtain a sample of the Pentium 4 3.6F, we expect our benchmarks to produce very similar results to the 3.6 Xeon tested for this review.

Without a doubt, the 3.6GHz Xeon trounces over the Athlon 64 3500+ in math-intensive synthetic benchmarks. Again, not that it is really a comparison between the two chips yet anyway, but perhaps something of a marker of things to come. However, real world benchmarks, with the exception of John the Ripper is where AMD came ahead instead. Even though John uses several different optimizations to generate hashes, in every case, the Athlon chip found itself at least 40% behind. Much of this is likely attributed to the additional math tweaking in the Prescott family core, and the lack of optimizations at compile time.

That's not to say that the Xeon CPU necessarily deserves excessive praise just yet. At time of publication, our Xeon processor retails for $850 and the Athlon 3500+ retails for about $500 less. The 3.6F processor the Xeon represents does not even exist in retail channels yet. Also, keep in mind that the AMD processor is clocked 1400MHz slower than the 3.6GHz Xeon. With only a few exceptions, synthetically the 3.6GHz Xeon outperformed our Athlon 64 3500+, whether or not the cost and thermal issues between these two processors are justifiable.

We will benchmark some SMP 3.6GHz Xeons against a pair of Opterons in the near future, so check back regularly for new benchmarks!

Update: We have addressed the issue with the -02 compile options in TSCP, the miscopy from previous benchmarks of the MySQL benchmark, and various other issues here and there in the testing of this processor. Expect a follow up article as soon as possible with an Opteron.
Home

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

277 Comments - Last by , 108 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by DrMrLordX, 2010 days ago
What the hell made you run a 3.6 ghz Nocona vs the 3500+?!? Try running it against an Opteron 150! For crying out loud . . .

Reply
No Subject by the5thgeek, 2010 days ago
what is the reason for comparing the new intel processor against the slowest socket 939 processor? why not a FX53 or 3800?

Reply
No Subject by gimp0, 2010 days ago
this was probably the worst comparison ever. At least give us some game benchmarks like UT2004 64bit and let us see some real numbers.

Server CPU against a mianstream chip in a database environment will surely favor the xeon.

whatever though

Reply
No Subject by Jeff7181, 2010 days ago
I would like to see some Pentium 4 3.6 GHz numbers in there too so we can see the effect of Intel's x86-64 support. With the data available, it's impossible to decide whether Intel has integrated it properly and gets a performance boost, or if a 3.6 GHz Xeon is just naturally that much faster than an Athlon-64 3500+... especially since 92/3 of those benchmarks are not benchmarks I've ever seen you run before so I have no idea how ANY other processor compares.

Sorry Kristopher, but this was a BAD article. There's not nearly enough information to draw any useful conclusions.

Reply
No Subject by Jeff7181, 2010 days ago
Ooops... I really wish it was possible to edit these. =) What I meant to say was...

"... especially since 2/3 of those benchmarks..."

Reply
No Subject by murdmath, 2010 days ago
Why are you running a Server chip (ie Xeon) against a Desktop chip (ie Athon 64)? Get an Opteron 150 and do it right.

Reply
No Subject by Locutus4657, 2010 days ago
Is it just me or is a Server/Workstation CPU v. Desktop CPU comparision anything but apples to apples? Perhapse apples to pears at best? Could please re-run every test with the correct hardware? While I'm in a mood to rant, why the heck is your site no longer storing passwords when posting comments to articles?

Reply
No Subject by Zebo, 2010 days ago
Wow!

In other news: "intel's offers 10M for anandtech.com"

Reply
No Subject by Shimmishim, 2010 days ago
what in the world are you doing?

is AT's review's getting worse and worse???

this by far has to be the worst review ever... comparable to those found at tom's...

kris... what in the world were you on when you did this review???

Reply
No Subject by Shimmishim, 2010 days ago
for real though, did intel pay you off for this review???

and you state that a 3500+ retails for less than $500... why don't you try less than $400 at most online vendors...

and you'll do a review later (opteron vs. xeon)??? why don't you do in the first place instead of being a lazy bum and trying to save face for intel...

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 28

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
MONITOR Your Virtual Infrastructure FREE
Prevent and Solve Problems with vWire. Download Your 30-Day FREE TRIAL Today!
Report Unlicensed Business Software Use
Earn Up to $1 Million by Reporting Unlicensed Software Use. Fill Out Our Form!
Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System - Free Trial
Collaborate and Develop Apps Faster. Get the Tools & Processes That Help Teams Work Effectively.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank




pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information