Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Intel Developer Forum 2007 - Day 1: More Nehalem, Penryn Announced, and Gelsinger Speaks
Intel Developer Forum 2007 - Day 1: More Nehalem, Penryn Announced, and Gelsinger Speaks
Date: September 18th, 2007
Topic: Trade Show
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Anand Shimpi & Larry Barber
Buy the Lenovo 6075BQU ThinkCentre M57
Blank
 CompuVest $517.52
 
 

More Nehalem

When we published today's initial coverage we gave Nehalem very short treatment, simply due to a lack of time, but now that things have slowed down a bit we can touch on the gravity of today's Nehalem demonstrations.

We've talked in the past about Intel's incredibly strong roadmap and how it's firing on all cylinders, today's demonstration is perfect indication of that. Penryn isn't even out the door yet and Nehalem is design-complete, undergoing testing and already running two major OSes according to Intel.

We've yet to lay our hands on AMD's Phenom, much less give you more than a crude set of performance expectations based on server hardware, needless to say Intel is doing to AMD, what AMD did to Intel for years while the Pentium 4 struggled to perform.

Let's say that again: Intel is showing an architecture that won't be out until the end of next year, today.

A mere four hours after the first Nehalem demo, Intel was back with another one and this one, even more impressive. Nehalem uses Intel's new QuickPath interconnect, formerly known as CSI, and a direct competitor to AMD's Hyper Transport. Doing away with the Front Side bus and implementing a point-to-point interconnect is a huge feature of Nehalem, especially for the enterprise market, and Intel's second demo showcased just that.

The second Nehalem system featured two quad-core Nehalem processors running in a two-socket system, the two sockets being connected via QuickPath.

Each quad-core Nehalem has SMT enabled, meaning each core can work on two threads simultaneously, so the entire box can simultaneously work on 16 threads as is evidenced by the obligatory task manager screenshot:

Obviously we have no performance data or clock speed information, we'd expect both to be quite low at this point but the fact that we're seeing the demo today is quite good. Despite worries of AMD being uncompetitive going forward, Intel seems to be proceeding according to plan, which is exactly what we want to see.


Nehalem will also add 7 new SSE4 instructions to its reportoire, note the diagram showing direct connections between processors and memory, very AMDesque

The Nehalem launch is a very important one for Intel as it is the first full repetition of its 2-year architectural cycle (tick-tock model); many wondered if Intel could pull it off, and we'll find out by this time next year.

The Transistor Issue: Nehalem Smaller than Penryn?   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

9 Comments - Last by pringlep0, 481 days ago
Username:
Password:
blurry by luxor, 794 days ago
Anand, these pics are blurry. You know this. We would love to be able to read some of these slides.

Reply
RE: blurry by mattsaccount, 794 days ago
"Johan made us late to the keynote and we had to sit in the back."

Bad Johan!

Reply
RE: blurry, IDF by rqle, 794 days ago
IDF is by far the most entertaining conference of them all.

Reply
RE: blurry by Tristesse27, 785 days ago
BTW, your pictures aren't blurry because you're sitting in the back. You're pictures are blurry because you have the wrong camera for the job.

Reply
USB 3.0 by DigitalFreak, 794 days ago
So, if it truely is 10x the performance, that would equate to 4.8Gb. Wow, who really needs ESATA then if CPU utilization is minimized? (Yes, I know ESATA will still have it's place).

Reply
RE: USB 3.0 by psychobriggsy, 793 days ago
I somehow suspect that CPU utilisation will not be minimised via "USB-offload-engines", so expect 4800Mbps USB3 to require quite a bit more CPU resources. If you want an interconnect with lower CPU utilisation, then there is always Firewire, although USB3 promises to put the freeze on that technology. Firewire needs to get its act together methinks.

Reply
RE: USB 3.0 by spinportal, 793 days ago
If USB 3.0 chipsets can forgo the saturation and polling deadlocking of the southbridge (data channels for SATA, IDE, USB, Ether(giga)net, PCIe bus? vs Northbridge on memory?) for competition of bandwidth, this kind of speed is worthwhile. What is the point of plugging in a USB device and lockstepping your OS's multithreading while it's negotiating? What's the point of throttling a USB channel, when your other channels tank, starve and choke?

Reply
I'm so happy...Cause today I found my friends.. by GhandiInstinct, 793 days ago
Kurt cobain would be proud...

Intel isn't getting lazy cause its on top, it's doing what a great company should do, trounce and eliminate all competition while it's customers get the cheapest and greatest technology.

GO INTEL!!!!

Now with USB3.0 even more reason to buy an ultimate rig from my AGP in 2H 2008.

Reply
best movie by pringlep0, 481 days ago
i am the loyal fans of http://www.tvokay.com
just go to http://www.tvokay.com watch full movies and TV shows...
the best movies and tv-shows at http://www.tvokay.com


Reply
Comments Page 1 of 1

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 November 20, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 November 19, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
more CPU & Chipset Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2009 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information