Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Intel Penryn Performance Preview: The Fastest gets Faster
Intel Penryn Performance Preview: The Fastest gets Faster
Date: April 18th, 2007
Topic: CPU & Chipset
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi
 
 

You knew it had to be coming. A year ago Intel previewed its first Core 2 processors ahead of their release, and with Penryn due out before the end of the year the boys in blue are back again.

Penryn is still pretty early, although Intel was able to reach over 3GHz on all of the samples we tested. Not surprisingly, the number of benchmarks we were able to run was quite limited. Intel also provided us with a handful of its own test results demonstrated at IDF Beijing which we have reproduced here as well.


Penryn in action

As a recap, Penryn is the 45nm micro-architectural update to Intel's current Core 2 processors. The slide below shows most of the improvements to Penryn:

A faster divider and super shuffle engine both improve IPC in very specific applications. As we mentioned in our IDF day 1 coverage, faster FSB speeds appear to be reserved for Penryn based Xeon processors at this point as desktop Penryn cores will use a 1333MHz FSB. Penryn takes the total amount of L2 cache up to 6MB per two cores, giving the quad core Penryn chips a total of 12MB of on-die L2 cache. Penryn also has improved power management technologies, but only for mobile Penryn chips.


Penryn up and running

The Test   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

65 Comments - Last by Webgod, 1025 days ago
Username:
Password:
Amazing by KhoiFather, 1028 days ago
Man, I just hope I can afford one of these bad boys when it comes out to the public. Its just amazing I tell ya and Intel just keeps rolling out their new CPUs. I'm guessing I'm going to need to upgrade my Gigabyte DS3 to another mobo to support the new Yorkfield CPU eh?

Reply
RE: Amazing by KCjoker, 1028 days ago
That's what I'd like to know, which current IF ANY mobo's will work with these new CPU's.

Reply
RE: Amazing by Webgod, 1025 days ago
bump.

If the Wolfdale is just a faster 45nm C2D, will the currently shipping Bad Axe 2's work with it with perhaps a new BIOS?? I mean Intel has a history of requiring all new gear. The Bad Axe 1 had to be tweaked to work with the Conroe C2D. Surely even if they're discontinuing the Bad Axe 2 (eventually sure) they could see that passing on the compatibility would get them off the shelves. And, it would be good PR for a change as far as compatibility goes, historically.

Reply
RE: Amazing by qquizz, 1028 days ago
These won't even be availabe til sometime in 2008, at least that is my understanding. So you got plenty of time to save up your money and by then I will talk you into buying AMD anyway In conclusion, I agree with the title of your post ;)

Reply
I would like to see some cards too by Regs, 1028 days ago
Though all we've been getting is words with no definitions. AMD has to show something by the end of this month. I see no excuse otherwise. They can't continue to throw us bones to pick at. That time ended over 6 months ago.

Reply
RE: I would like to see some cards too by Souka, 1028 days ago
I'd like to see 2 current top gen AMD chips included in bench... just to show how much of a difference there is...





Reply
RE: I would like to see some cards too by GlassHouse69, 1028 days ago
2 months ago, amd released information that the new technology will speed things up vs raw clock speed....


raw clock speed is winning.... amd might be toast :(

sux i hate intel


Reply
RE: I would like to see some cards too by Roy2001, 1028 days ago
I'd like to see 2 current top gen AMD chips included in bench... just to show how much of a difference there is...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man, 6000+ falls short of E6700 and barely beats E6600 if not equal. So AMD has no player in Penryn arena, at least for now. If they cannot crank Barcelona frequency higher, then they have no chance. 2.3Ghz is simply far from enough to compete with 3.33Ghz Penryn.

Reply
RE: I would like to see some cards too by Goty, 1028 days ago
You're assuming that Barcelona won't outperform Penryn on an IPC basis, which nobody can say yet.

Reply
RE: I would like to see some cards too by Roy2001, 1028 days ago
Clock to clock, Barcelona could be faster. I just mean 2.3Ghz is too slow to compete with Penryn. If AMD can make it faster, say 2.8Ghz, it could compete with Penryn. This is just my 2 cents.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 7

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more CPU & Chipset Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information