Gaming Performance - Unreal Tournament 2003

We introduced the latest Unreal Tournament 2003 benchmark in our GPU Shootout article a few weeks back and we're continuing to use it as an example of a next-generation game test.

We benchmarked only under one level - DM-Asbestos (a very CPU bound benchmark) as our other UT2003 benchmark did not vary with CPU speed on any of the 2GHz+ CPUs (DM-Antalus is GPU limited in most situations unless you have a Radeon 9700 Pro at your disposal).

Gaming Performance - Unreal Tournament 2003
DM-Asbestos - Frames per Second (higher is better)
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.53GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.4BGHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.60GHz (400MHz)

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ (2.13GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.50GHz (400MHz)

AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (2.00GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.26GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz (400MHz)

AMD Athlon XP 2200+ (1.80GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.20GHz (400MHz)

AMD Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1900+ (1.60GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1700+ (1.47GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0AGHz (400MHz)

182.2

179.5

174.4

174.1

173.6

173.0

171.1

170.5

170.1

168.8

163.6

163.5

163.1

162.4

160.9

158.3

155.3

155.3

|
0
|
36
|
73
|
109
|
146
|
182
|
219

3D games are known bandwidth hogs and thus we can see that the new 400MHz parts have a difficult time keeping up with their 533MHz counterparts. As expected, the new 2.80GHz Pentium 4 takes the crown under Unreal Tournament 2003.

Media Encoding Performance Gaming Performance (continued)
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now