POST A COMMENT

7 Comments

Back to Article

  • MySchizoBuddy - Thursday, October 11, 2012 - link

    Can you please do an article with CUDA only benchmarks comparing various NVIDIA only GPUs. Reply
  • jaydee - Thursday, October 11, 2012 - link

    No displayport on any of these? Really? Reply
  • Conficio - Thursday, October 11, 2012 - link

    In the table both Gigabyte cards are listed with the same clockspeeds,, while the detailed text says one id higher clocked. Reply
  • Conficio - Thursday, October 11, 2012 - link

    Don't listen to me. They are both overclocked the same way?? Reply
  • jaydee - Thursday, October 11, 2012 - link

    I think the differentiator is the amount of RAM, not the clock speeds. THe more expensive card has 2GB of GDDR5, the cheaper one has 1GB. Reply
  • Teknobug - Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - link

    Looks like they're going into the HTPC or microITX design low profile now? I always hated long cards, I've had problems with some long cards in the past and had to buy a different case because the long card would hit the HDD bracket. The old Gravis UltraSound back in the 90's was one of the longest cards I've ever had and was a headache to fit into my 486 at the time.

    Question is, with such a low profile like that, will it be up to the task for heavy gaming and have adequate cooling with just 1 fan?
    Reply
  • otakotak - Thursday, December 20, 2012 - link

    I bought Gigabyte Windforce 2 months ago but now it failed. what reason occurence of damage . really lost to me $175 us dollar( RM460 in my country) to use for 2 months . can anyone help. sorry my broken language Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now