Back to Article

  • Blindsay04 - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    1366x768? ill pass, and probably a TN panel as well. Reply
  • hp79 - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    But.. but.. it's a "commercial Ultrabook"! They must be nuts to use these crap resolution on a 14 inch "commercial Ultrabook". Reply
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    Yeah.. who in their right mind would try to actually work on some commercial Ultrabook! Reply
  • IvanAndreevich - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    My god, look at that BEZEL! Wow. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    Edge-to-edge glass covering the LCD panel, actually, so I'm not sure how much space is really bezel. I wouldn't go by the gallery shot of the keyboard either, as it looks like a rendered image rather than a photo. Reply
  • hp79 - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    haha, are you referring to the 13" or the 14"?
    Wow for the 13"s enormous fat bezel (fugly), and then another wow for the 14" that has virtually no bezel at all (really nice).
  • hp79 - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    You mean to say SSD weighs 10% less than a HDD. Overall, it looks like SSD option weighs 1% less weight. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    No, I mean that the U772 with an SSD weighs 10% less than the UH572 (which has an HDD+SSD combo -- 9% less if we equip both with the same storage). Reply
  • hp79 - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    Now the sentence makes sense. Cool :)

    It's kinda weird that the 14" ultrabook is lighter than their own 13" ultrabook. I think everyone would go for the 14" unless budget is the only problem. But the ugly screen resolution spoils everything on that sexy 14".
  • ajp_anton - Wednesday, June 06, 2012 - link

    Nowadays I just skip to the screen spec, and stop reading if it's 1366x768. Saves a lot of time, you should try it. Reply
  • fuzzybabybunny - Monday, June 11, 2012 - link

    Pretty much. 1366x768, not interested, don't even need to read any further. Don't care, will never look at the product, and never have it be a consideration.

    Laptop manufacturers, take note. Asus and Apple actually get what consumers want with their 1080p screens on their ultrabooks. Hell, at least make it an *option*. And don't cheap out and provide a crappy TN panel.

    1366x768 is practically useless for most work.
  • Coup27 - Saturday, July 28, 2012 - link

    Hi Jarred,

    I really think AT should make a bit more of an effort to cover Fujitsu hardware. I appreciate that you said their popularity in the US isn't that great, but AT is an International site and I do think they are popular and a lot of business IT people (ie me) do read AT and use it's information to assist our decision making.

    I'm actually working with a Fujitsu TX200 S6 and some LIFEBOOK E751's and I have been very impressed with their overall feature set, build quality and general package. Fujitsu don't shy away from technical data in their data sheets and present all the information us tech's love, and Dell and HP love to hide. I think it's a shame they're forgotten about on AT.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now