Back to Article

  • Articuno - Monday, January 09, 2012 - link

    How is this any different, aside from the increased costs from building a touchscreen in instead of just a regular screen and being locked to Intel? Reply
  • GeorgeH - Monday, January 09, 2012 - link

    My thoughts exactly. Unless I'm missing something we've seen the "use your PC when it's off" gimmick many times before - and nobody cared. Reply
  • augiem - Monday, January 09, 2012 - link

    You got it. The key word is DIFFERENT. That's all that matters. Designers are idiots. Reply
  • piroroadkill - Monday, January 09, 2012 - link

    Nobody bought it first time, nobody cares about this time.

    We all have smartphones for this kind of stuff. First off, PC manufacturers, give us a trackpad as smooth as the one as that which you get on a Mac. Seriously, goddamn.

    Sit there with a HP laptop with the single button disaster, and sit there with any Macbook made in the last year and a bit.

    There's no comparison, and I'd wager almost all Windows laptops are just as bad, and probably not smooth (using ghetto arrow key/mousewheel emulation instead of ultra smooth native scrolling as in Mac OS X).
  • Shadowmage - Friday, January 13, 2012 - link

    Screw trackpads, what I want is a decent keyboard. Have you tried the horrible Macbook Air keyboard? Chiclet keyboards need to die a slow death. Reply
  • Shadowmage - Friday, January 13, 2012 - link

    Also, why are PC manufacturers trying to copy a horrible chiclet-style keyboard in the first place? Reply
  • danchen - Friday, January 13, 2012 - link

    Its certainly different, and kinda cool - but pointless.
    We've already got the convertible laptop format which can twist its screen around so it becomes a tablet when closed. Isn't that better than having just a tiny window ?
    Plus, this concept will force the laptop to become thicker - just because more footprint is sacrificed for a big thick piece of glass.
  • Malih - Friday, January 13, 2012 - link

    I can see this happening if they can make it as thin as an ultrabook, and with decent battery life.

    if it's too thick or too heavy then it's of no use, flipping a 5 pounds (and up) laptop to use that small glass view after closing the lid will not be comfortable.
  • ssj4Gogeta - Saturday, January 14, 2012 - link

    Unless they use OLED screens, they'll be wasting power keeping whole of the screen on when only half of it is usable. So why not just make it a convertible? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now