POST A COMMENT

14 Comments

Back to Article

  • Hikari - Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - link

    This is something like 2x as fast as the 9700 mobility, get real. It is pretty much the equivalent of a 9700 pro desktop part, however. Reply
  • randomman - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    I realize that it would not be an exact comparison, but could you add some old benchies from the 9700 Mobility and 9800 M. This would give a better point of comparison than just against a desktop sys.
    Also are there any things available talking about the differences in power optimizations between the old 9700 and the X700?
    Reply
  • Guspaz - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    Is there much point to the review of of a notebook graphics chip that has NO comparison to any other mobile graphics chips?

    Personally I find the benchmarks in this review totally useless.
    Reply
  • Jep4444 - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    the big selling feature of this over the mobile 9700 is that it provides better battery life, it is also a more powerful chip than the mobile 9700 Reply
  • onix - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    How do we think graphics chip on this computer will compare to the Thinkpad T43p's ATI Mobility FIRE GL V3200 (128 MB)? Reply
  • bobsmith1492 - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    Yeah, I play Doom 3 on medium, 1280x1024; runs pretty well. Same processor too; P-M, but with regular DDR, OCd to 2.125. Reply
  • trikster2 - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    #6

    This is the same as the 9700 mobility????

    Blech.

    This is what we have been waiting for?

    Reply
  • arfan - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    where is the pictures? Reply
  • bobsmith1492 - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    So, basically this performs about the same as my 9700 mobility. Yay. Reply
  • L3p3rM355i4h - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    ho hum...how much does this thing weigh? Surely not as much as that brick XPS. Reply
  • L3p3rM355i4h - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    Reply
  • Live - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    Very interesting!

    A broader comparison to not only PCIe would be welcome. How does this perform against the old centrino and ATI mobility ranges?
    Reply
  • Rand - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    What did the Travelmate 8100 weigh in the tested configuration? Reply
  • ShizNet - Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - link

    just one thing -
    how come i MUST have 10 pound heat sink w/ TURBO-JET fanZ to achieve a bit higher results in synthetic benchmarks
    while the same (or close to) cpu is running in ~1 inch case and it's good enough to play NEW games

    someOne is not telling the truth
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now