Shuttle SK83G: VIA's Shot at SFF

by Evan Lieb on 7/14/2004 12:05 AM EST
POST A COMMENT

18 Comments

Back to Article

  • aw - Thursday, July 29, 2004 - link

    I have a question. In the final thoughts:

    "Overall, we were most impressed with the quiet and cool operation of the SK83G, its well thought-out exterior and neatly organized interior, and the little additional features (rubber washers, tied down PSU wires, well positioned card reader, etc.)"

    When you say "card reader" did you mean a compact flash card reader? This is a nice feature of SFF PC's but I didn't see it mentioned in the article or in the pics anywhere. Maybe I am confused ;-)
    Reply
  • nserra - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    #overclockingoodness
    I would like to see you on the days of the 286, 386, 486 it would be funny.

    The difference between you and the others like the ones who make posts at http://www.megagames.com is not much. You must be a 12yr old child who think know everything about computers, have you ever come out from your house and see the true world, the true reality? Have talked with other people non computer fanatics like your self? Regular PC users? Do you know about their needs? What they really want?

    From all the video cards in the world how many you do think are overclocked? 1/10000 1/1000 1/100? 1/10?

    How many people do you think came to my store and ask me about overclocking? Or what's better nvidia card's or ati cards? Even if I tell them don’t buy the 5600 go for the 9600 pro it's faster and cheaper, they go for nvidia, they have nvidia graved on their minds I can't do nothing, the same problem was on the 3dfx(voodoo)/powervr(pcx1/2) days.

    I agree with you when you say "...hence the reason to implement high-end technologies that business users will never use."
    How many people do you think buys a P4 3Ghz just for surf the net, print stuff and word/excel processing? 1/10000 1/1000 1/100? 1/10? When even a C3 1Ghz is more then enough to do that?

    Do you know why there is 6/8 USB 2.0 ports on current PC’s, instead of 2/4 USB 1.1 and 2/4 USB 2.0? Do you know why USB 2.5” external hard drives powered by the USB cable work fine in USB1.1 mode, but not on USB2.0 mode? And the issues that come from this?

    Just because I don’t agree with you I am wrong, and vice versa? It’s my opinion. It’s your opinion.
    “you can't come up with any decent arguments you are just posting crap”, and your argument’s where are they? I didn’t see you or any one saying what is right, you only say I am wrong, you don’t say why are you right!

    I think who is scared is every one in here that can’t even see what is SM3.0 for example, have any one read Microsoft documents about SM3.0, maybe then some people didn’t say the stupid things they say. I cant be some one that don’t sell Ati because don’t have SM3.0 or that don’t sell Nvidia just because SM3.0 is not a big deal. I must sell what people want (some know, other go for others opinion, for others anything that is working is good, only some ask the opinion), the only think I can do is keep rightly informed.
    Reply
  • overclockingoodness - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    Yes, many of them might be space savers or people are looking into some looks and stuff, but belive it or not they are still inclined towards enthusiasts, hence the reason to implement high-end technologies that business users will never use.

    Just because a machine is designed for enthusiasts doesn't mean only enthusiasts can buy them. Companies have to open their options feature wise in order to sell more units. That's how business works...you should know that since you are a "business owner" yourself. Almost all motherboards (enthusiast and non-enthusiast) come with on-board sound so just because this SFF has on-board doesn't mean that it is not for enthusiasts. Maybe you need to check your facts sometimes. What a misinformed jerk?


    You can upgrade almost everything in a SFF system including the power supply, video card, sound card, hard drive, CPU, case, CPU cooler, case fans etc. etc. The only thing you can't upgrade is the motherboard. Do you even know what an upgradable system is? I guess not and yet you claim to own the "largest PC store" in your area. I bet the area only has about 10 people living in it. You are such a moron.

    Almost all enthusiasts overclock their system. Overclocking system does not mean that the system is unstable. Even increasing the system bus by 2MHz means overclocking. How many systems will get unstable with the 2MHz FSB increase. You can overclock a lot with good cooling. You need to re-learn the definition of of overclocking? How do you claim to own the "most selling PC store" when you don't even know what overclocking is? Hey Dumbass, go and check your facts.

    Processor is not more important than the motherboard. They are both equally important. 2.4GHz "C" is the legendary overclocker for Intel systems and if you use this CPU with a PC Chips motherboard, you will hardly get any overclocking done on the CPU. In this case, the high capabilities of the CPU is useless. Once again, better check your facts before posting stupid arguments like these. It seems to me you are scamming in your "most selling PC store" by misinforming them.

    Okay...I agree with you on the high-end CPU. But you are still a misinformed fool about the other facts and you are still scamming your consumers.





    The thing is...I seemed to have hit your misinformed neves with my comments and since you can't come up with any decent arguments you are just posting crap. I also noticed that atleast one more user agreed with me and you couldn't tolerate that with your hot-headed temper. The testing methods you suggested to AnandTech staff were also declined by them, which made you even angry because they could care less about you.


    People like me wouldn't want to work for such a dumbass boss anyways. Take my advise...stop scamming people, quadruple check your facts before posting, go to your mamma's house because now I know you are crying and STFU.


    HAHA...what a scammer. I wish people like you go out of business. Maybe jerk is the right word for me, but STUPID seems to better describe you.
    Reply
  • nserra - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    #4 You are wrong!
    People who buy these systems are:
    - Out of space users
    - And people who want a PC, but don’t want it to look like one
    - A system that can make them spare money on an audio system

    If they are LAN machines for enthusiasts, I don’t see the need of the integrated graphics card? Where is the SB sound card? Or you only give credits to the graphics performance. Maybe the on board speaker is enough for you.

    What enthusiast user buys a practicality non upgradeable system? Have any one heard of PS2, XBOX? I guess not.

    Overclock a system that looks like a cube? Are you crazy? Unless, you like unstable systems and lookups while playing games.

    The post of overclocking results is good, but if you are smart, you should already know that the processor is more important when you consider overclocking then the motherboard.

    I didn’t say the AMD 64 was ok, but why I would like a high end CPU if I am not going to do gaming? You must be joking.... have you heard of VB studio, DB, CAD soft, even DVD ripping? Maybe you skipped the Workstation and General performance and Encoding benchmarks, maybe a 4X SLI Geforce Ultra Extreme would help there don’t you think, maybe you can’t think, because you are not very cleaver. Jerk is the right word.

    I am the owner of the most selling PC store in my region in a ratio of 100KM, people like you, I don’t want them working for me, because they sell 1 PC to 100 clients, and not 90 PC to each 100 clients.
    Reply
  • MIDIman - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    Confused...every single SFF article at anandtech has a noise db benchmark. This was the first with only a subjective noise comment in the Summary:

    "Overall, we were most impressed with the quiet and cool operation of the SK83G..."

    That's it?
    Reply
  • lupis42 - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    I would tend to cuncur with number 4, and I'm surprised you guys let this machine off so easily. Compare relative performance and feature set to Shuttle's Athlon XP offerings, and it plainly sucks. The SN421G for example, was a gaming system, but unlike this one it had an excellent feature set, including excellent integrated graphics. Honestly, this sounds like a worse deal except for the A64 support. Where's the nForce 3 250GB? And not ditch the whole socket 754 thing, since AMD is phasing that socket into low end anyway? And why bother with the integrated video if it isn't usable? Also, why not integrate good sound? And can the front audio ports be hooked up to a PCI soundboard? This system sounds fairly shoddy, and not what I would want to consider a good AMD small form factor. As a side note, I disagree entirely with the idea that the system should be a little larger to allow for another drive. Part of the selling point of Shuttles is that they are SMALLER than the competition, especially than competing micro-ATX systems. If the Shuttle case was larger, it would start to lose out on the size selling point, and they would need to give you a better power supply if you were planning to put drives and a modern AGP card in it. All in all, nice benchmarking, but I'm surprised at the positivity of the review. This falls short on far too many counts. Reply
  • Evan Lieb - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Sonic587, I think that's just a flaw with the engine, but I'll see what I can do.

    Jeff, I'm not sure who changed the title, but that wasn't the original title. I'll change it if it's not already too late.

    nserra, Wes and others have answered your points adequately, so I don't see a need to comment further.

    ggnl, good point, it's embarrassing. We're trying to do something about it. Bare with us. :)

    cosmotic, we tested nForce3 150/250Gb motherboards and SFFs for this review.

    coutch, we did give our subjective analysis. But in the future, we'll have actual instruments to test noise levels. You won't have to worry about it for too much longer. Our Linux section is a work in progress, that type of testing will take time (mostly because there isn't nearly enough demand for Linux testing).

    quorm, we weren't particularly impressed with this SFF either. As far as S939 goes, we're getting some S939 SFFs in this week.
    Reply
  • quorm - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    I'm always happy to see more SFF reviews. But, based on your review, I'm pretty disappointed that Shuttle bothered to put out a new AMD SFF with such minor improvements over their previous AMD64 machine. Also, that thing is extremely ugly. What I really want to see is a Socket939 Shuttle with all of the features of their new Intel SFF (hi-quality audio, multiple drive support, cooling zones, etc.). Any word on something like that? Here's a review of the new Intel SFF.

    http://www.sfftech.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=563
    Reply
  • thomas35 - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Hi, another nice review as always. But how about doing a review on Iwill's SFF dual Opteron system? According to their website, they started "sampling" the product this month, so maybe you can get your hands on one and tell us if they are worth buying. Reply
  • coutch - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Firstly ... NOISE !

    Even if just a subjective analysis, please include noise level tests of these SFF in the future. Some of them have been plagued with horrible levels of fan noise ...

    Secondly, it would be great to have more Linux tests done on motherboards review. Even if it's just trying to install a distro and see what works/doesn't work out of the box ... mostly for onboard controllers compatibility ...
    Reply
  • cosmotic - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Am I the only one that wants to know how they got NVIDIA IDE controllers on VIA chipset motherboards? Ether that, or your specs are wrong. Reply
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    #3 - You might be surprised at how some use their SFF machines. For example, the Shuttle SFF based on the 875 chipset has become a darling of the Extreme Overclocking crowd. In fact, I know 2 users who run their 875 SFF with mobile processors for low heat, the FSB at 300FSB, and top-end video. They take the machines to LAN parties.

    We always publish stock performance metrics as our baseline. If you don't personally care about overclocking an SFF, then just skip that information. We understand overclocking info is not important to some, but it does matter to others.
    Reply
  • ggnl - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Good review. Very informative, but I have a problem.

    The pictures are just fugly! I don't understand why you couple great analysis of the hardware with blurry, out of focus, poorly lit photographs.

    And it's not just this review, most of the reveiws on this site have the same crappy pictures. Please...pretty please with sugar on top...send one or two of your tech gurus to a basic studio photography class at the local community college and get a camara with decent macro ability. What did you do with that Canon 10D you reviewed a few weeks ago?

    This from the site that's going to be bringing you camera reviews...
    Reply
  • overclockingoodness - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    nserra #3 - I can't disagree with you more.

    1. These systems are mainly designed as portable LAN machines for enthusiasts. And since AT is an enthusiasts, it makes sense to overclock the systems. Almost every site posts overclocking reslts, which makes complete sense.

    2. Why not? Many enthusiasts want best performance from these little PCs. If you want the best gaming performance, it makes complete sense to include a 6800 Ultra and/or 9800. I think you are the one with a messed up mind. So you are saying that having an Athlon64 chip is right, but having a high-end video card is wrong? Why the heck would someone want a high-end CPU if they are not going to do gaming? Your arguments are useless.

    3. Yeah, I agree with that BUT these systems are not for small businesses and schools who are not going to do anything with it. Don't forget that these systems are tragetted towards enthusiasts and nicely enough SFF proves be to a good form factor for space conscious users.

    4. Yep, agreed.

    5. You are wrong again. AnandTech has a selected benchmark suites which they use everytime to compare performance against competitor's products. If they were to start using new gaming and new testing methods for each product review, we, as readers, won't be able to understand the difference between each product and/or AnandTech will have to review 10 systems over and over again, which is a huge time wastage.




    I give you some credit for your post but all the important points are bogus and utterly useless. Please check your facts and by the way if these reviews are getting boring...then why in the world are you even reading them. Stop complaining and do not ask AnandTech to change the testing methods upside down just because you. You are not special, in fact, you are one of the ignorant readers who doesn't know a thing about computers.
    Reply
  • nserra - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    Guys, these reviews are starting to get boring.

    1st - I don’t see the point of testing over clocking capabilities on "cube" PC's, it's ridiculous. The people at the market these products are aimed, this is not important, especially on such small systems, who want to do that.
    2nd - I don’t see the point of buying a such small system and put a Geforce 6800 or even an ati 9800, the person that does that is not in it right mind.
    3rd - the review of a system like these is more important sound quality and video quality playback as 2D display quality, and specially functionality or "extras" that systems like these have.
    4th - The noise the system make while is working is also very important.
    5th – And really these charts that always look the same are getting boring, or you start choosing applications/games that show “significant” differences between the various chipsets or these review get boring to read.
    Reply
  • Jeff7181 - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    I don't understand why this is "AMD's shot at SFF."

    Shuttle has had AMD based SFF computers for a while now... is the processor a special SFF processor or something?
    Reply
  • Sonic587 - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    On the Quake 3 Arena w/Unichrome benches, could you move the FPS results further to the right? You've got some text overlapping there and it's quite hard for me to read what FPS was obtained.

    Other than that, nice review.
    Reply
  • Gbugmenot - Thursday, October 17, 2013 - link

    The difference between you and the others like the ones who make posts at http://www.stackfront.com is not much. You must be a 12yr old child who think know everything about computers, have you ever come out from your house and see the true world, the true reality? Have talked with other people non computer fanatics like your self? Regular PC users? Do you know about their needs? What they really want?

    From all the video cards in the world how many you do think are overclocked? 1/10000 1/1000 1/100? 1/10?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now