NV45 Preview: On Package HSI

by Derek Wilson on 6/28/2004 1:00 AM EST


Back to Article

  • Pete - Thursday, July 01, 2004 - link

    Thanks much for the prompt reply, Derek. Reply
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, June 30, 2004 - link

    PPro cahce was a seperate hunk of silicon nudged right up next to the core ;-) search google images for pentium pro and you'll see the what it looked like under there.


    #1 not sure when that's going to happen, but it will be enevitable for both companies. How we get there is the question. ;-)

    #2 our demo is the same, only drivers have changed from our previous tests. We are looking into IQ also...

    hope that helps,
    Derek Wilson
  • Pete - Tuesday, June 29, 2004 - link

    Sorry, Derek, please ignore #3. For some reason I missed that you specified the 6800U (PCIe) was a custom-clocked NV45. Reply
  • Pete - Tuesday, June 29, 2004 - link

    Hi Derek,

    Can you help clarify three things?

    1. I remember reading that ATi would eventually move to all-PEG-native GPUs, and then use a bridge for AGP cards, similar to nV's future plans. Did you hear anything about this from ATi or their OEMs/partners?

    2. Did you change your Far Cry demo, or are new drivers responsible for the impressive gains the 6800U has made to significantly overtake the X800XT(PE)?

    3. The "NV45" in your charts is simply a higher-clocked "6800U (PCIe)," right? Did you down-clock the NV45 to attain the 6800U PCIe numbers used in Anand's earlier LGA article?
  • KF - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    I'm not sure how garbled a recollecton can be, Minotaar. That's not the way I remember it. The PPro had the cache on separate chips in a complex package that plugged into a socket. PIIs, slot cartridge style, had separate cache chips at first, and no cache chips for the first Celeron, true. Later PIIs, and PII style Celerons had on-die full speed cache. On die, reduced size, cache for such as the notable 300 MHz (not 266) Celery that OCed 1.5x by setting the bus speed to 100 instead of 66.

    Back to the subject, There are some very odd results for a solution that is supposed to be, and mostly is, equal between AGP and PCIe.
  • GTMan32 - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    There was a web site reporting that NVIDIA opened up one of ATIs PCIe chips and found it wasn't native but just had the bridging on-chip like the NV45.

    Then there was another comment that the ATI PCIe chips were clocked lower because of OEM fears that they were running too hot at the same speed as the AGP parts.

    One could conclude that the tacked on AGP->PCIe bridge was causing this since it would be the same size as the AGP plus the extra circuits for the bridge. If the ATI solution was really native then it shouldn't have any heating problems?

    But was all this just a rumor. I haven't heard anything on this since.
  • OCedHrt - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    A possible explanation for the drop in performance on the PCIe cards could be due to specific optimizations that aren't enabled for the PCIe cards in the current drivers. Just a wild guess. Reply
  • ZobarStyl - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    This bridging seems to be the perfect solution for first generation PCI-E chips which have nothing to gain over AGP anyway...just so long as nV doesn't get lazy and has a native PCI-E card by next gen (which might actually use the bandwidth), they really haven't lost anything with this solution. Good article. Reply
  • Filibuster - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    The Pentium Pro, by todays standards, *does* have on package cache because it was not part of the cpu core. It is full cpu speed however.


    The big deal about the Pentium 2 cache was that Intel had to make it that way so they could test the cache chips separately from the cpu and thus save money, because the PPRo was soo expensive.
  • Wonga - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    Pentium Pro also had the advantage of clock speed cache, whereas P2's cache was bus speed.

    Well, if we want to be correct about everything, the P2's cache was not run at bus speed, but instead a fraction of the core speed. Half the core speed, to be precise.

    Anyway, cheers for the review. Looks like nVidia listened to their OEM partners here and did the sensible thing bringing the HSI on package.
  • kherman - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    How did this get eh NV45 label? Shouldn't this be the NV40p or sum'n? Reply
  • Minotaar - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    Pentium Pro did NOT have on-package cache. Pentium Pro had On-DIE cache. Pentium 2 took a step backwards and had on-package cache (that huge ugly slot garbage, with the triple fans from OC co's like Glacier? The side two fans cooled cache chips on the side). It wasnt until Socket P3 that on-die cache came back.

    Thats why celeron happened the way it did. it started off as a p2 with none of the on-package cache. Remember the ol' celly 266 that OC'd to 450, and for some lucky ones 504? Well That was just the P2 card without the cache on the sides - the sides were empty.

    Pentium Pro also had the advantage of clock speed cache, whereas P2's cache was bus speed. But I digress. The article has an inconsistancy.
  • Brucmack - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    Well, you're not going to gain anything in the near future with PCIe, so if you already have an AGP card, don't bother.

    It would probably be a good idea to get a PCIe card if you're upgrading to the new Intel chipset though. The boards that have both PCIe and AGP slots are running the AGP slot off of the PCI bus, so there will be a slight performance penalty associated with that.
  • GhandiInstinct - Monday, June 28, 2004 - link

    So is AGP8x faster or better than PCIe, because that's what I got from those earlier benchmarks. Or will drivers and optimizations change that in the future?

    Basically, is it worth while(money) to purchase PCIe now?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now