SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

View Single Product View Comparison

Bench Results

Samsung 960 EVO 1TB - Samsung Polaris - Samsung 256Gbit TLC V-NAND

SanDisk X400 1TB - Marvell 88SS1074 - SanDisk 15nm TLC NAND

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

1206

415

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

809.19

309.62

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

229

1842

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.02

0.19

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.15

1.03

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

13.53

11.97

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

667.46

251.08

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

156.6

1164

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.07

1.21

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

1.84

1.4

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

1262.39

353.92

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

63.8

379.1

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.01

0.23

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.7

0.45

Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

436.35

152.25

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

2.93

2.27

Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

110.96

69.42

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

1.95

1.41

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

978.09

283.65

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

4.44

3.43

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

1995.61

542.03

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

4.5

2.52

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

244.63

106.65

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

2.35

1.75

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

827.2

260.2

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

3.49

2.42

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better

24892.9

2797.9

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better

49.08

4.66

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

2553.61

514.28

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

1945.28

437.57

Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

109