SSD 2015 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

SSD15 Product Benchmarks

View Single Product View Comparison

Bench Results

Crucial BX100 250GB - Silicon Motion SM2246EN - Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC

Crucial MX200 250GB - Marvell 88SS9189 - Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better

305

910

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

248.98

116.45

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

1877.9

4693.6

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >100ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.33

0.32

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

1.29

5.99

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

9.38

20.77

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

289.81

296.04

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

919.27

762.23

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.75

0.27

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.83

1.52

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better

398.32

372.4

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Average Service Time in Microseconds - Lower is Better

320.51

306.71

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)
Percentage of >10ms Service Times - Lower is Better

0.15

0.14

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)
Power Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better

0.28

0.41

Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

208.96

245.62

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

1.7

1.98

Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

62.15

68.71

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

0.9

1.46

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

378.56

370.17

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

3.03

2.92

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better

522.11

412.52

Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read (Power)
Average Power Consumption of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Scores in Watts - Lower is Better

1.47

2.27

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

105.95

71.3

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

1.31

1.98

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better

275.39

154.54

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)
Average Power Consumption of All Read/Write Distributions in Watts - Lower is Better

1.85

2.26

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance
Average IOPS of Last 400 Seconds - Higher is Better

4621.93

5907.64

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency
IOPS Divided By Standard Deviation - Higher is Better

0.7

17.27

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Read Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

518.85

499.39

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance
Write Speed in MB/s - Higher is Better

362.72

466.53

Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better