Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AnandTech Bench (beta)

For years we've generated hundreds upon thousands of benchmark results for every article we do. Most of these results are presented in the articles themselves and forgotten as soon as the next big thing launches, that changes today. We're going to start opening up our internal benchmark database to the public.

The first incarnation includes CPU performance data in SYSMark 2007 for nearly all current AMD and Intel CPUs. Over the coming weeks we will add results for all of our standard CPU benchmarks, if you have any requests please email us directly. Any technical problems, please email our webmaster.










Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 - 3.16GHz - 6MB L2
vs. Intel Core i7 860 - 2.80GHz - 1MB L2 - 8MB L3
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Overall
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    201
    223
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - E-Learning
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    209
    191
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Video Creation
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    203
    243
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - Productivity
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    209
    220
  • Hide me
    SYSMark 2007 - 3D
    Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
    185
    244
  • Hide me
    Adobe Photoshop CS4 - Retouch Artists Speed Test
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    27.3
    16
  • Hide me
    DivX 6.8.5 Encode (Xmpeg 5.0.3)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    56.9
    36
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 1st pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    41.7
    76
  • Hide me
    x264 HD Encode Test - 2nd pass - x264 0.59.819
    Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
    10.8
    27
  • Hide me
    Windows Media Encoder 9 x64
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    44
    30
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc 3dsmax 8 CPU Test
    CPU Rendering Composite Score - Higher is Better
    7.9
    15
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Radiosity
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    21
    11
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Throne Shadowmap
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    14.3
    9
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - CBALLS2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    8.4
    5
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SinglePipe2
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    38.2
    17
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Underwater
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    46.4
    20
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SpaceFlyby
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    41.3
    25
  • Hide me
    3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - UnderwaterEscape
    Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    37.6
    22
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    3895
    4490
  • Hide me
    Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark
    Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
    7596
    16598
  • Hide me
    POV-Ray 3.7 beta 23 - SMP Benchmark
    CPU Score in PPS - Higher is Better
    1351
    3517
  • Hide me
    Par2 - Multi-Threaded par2cmdline 0.4
    Time to Recover 57.2MB from 707.5MB Archive in Seconds - Lower is Better
    56.3
    23
  • Hide me
    Blender 2.48a Character Render
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    81.1
    52
  • Hide me
    Microsoft Excel 2007 SP1 - Monte Carlo Simulation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    31.3
    15
  • Hide me
    Sony Vegas Pro 8 - Blu-ray Disc Image Creation (25Mbps MPEG-2)
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    359.6
    187
  • Hide me
    Sorenson Squeeze Pro 5 - Flash Video Creation
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    243
    108
  • Hide me
    WinRAR 3.8 Compression - 300MB Archive
    Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
    135
    80
  • Hide me
    Fallout 3 - 1680 x 1050 - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    88
    90
  • Hide me
    Left 4 Dead - 1680 x 1050 - Max Settings (No AA/AF/Vsync)
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    120.8
    131
  • Hide me
    Far Cry 2 - 1680 x 1050 - Playback (Action Scene) - Medium Quality
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    47.4
    72
  • Hide me
    Crysis Warhead - 1680 x 1050 - Mainstream Quality (Physics on Enthusiast) - assault bench
    Frames per Second - Higher is Better
    82
    83


Add Item
Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

NOAA Releases Wealth of Climate Change Data to Public
Blank
Catching the Buzz on the Facebook-Like Google Buzz
Blank
Job Losses Concern NASA Administrator
Blank
Texas Instruments WiLink 7.0 is Industry's First Quad-radio Chip
Blank
Boeing's Next-generation 747-800 Takes First Flight
Blank
2/9/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews -- Radeon HD 5570 Edition
Blank
Seagate Launching 600GB Server Drives With 2M Hour MTBF
Blank
Former Intel Exec Rajiv Goel Pleads Guilty in Insider Trading Case
Blank
NVIDIA Optimus Tech Makes Switching Between Internal Notebook GPUs Seamless
Blank
Native Americans Fighting to Stop MA Wind Farm, Locals Fight Farm in MI
Blank
Google Reduces ETF for Nexus, Unveils Phone Support Line
Blank
ATI Launches Radeon HD 5570, Continues to Drive DX11 Volume
Blank
Microsoft Claims Windows 7 Has No Battery Life Problems, Customers Say Otherwise
Blank
Ford Reveals All-electric 2011 Transit Connect with 80-Mile Range
Blank
Toyota Announces Global Recall of Prius, Lexus HS 250h Hybrids Over ABS Software
Blank
Boeing Spy Given 15-Year Prison Sentence
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Nexus One Reportedly Isn't Selling Well, But Linux Founder Loves It
Blank




pipeboost    Appro
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information