Legacy CPU Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Intel (Sandy Bridge) Core i7 2600K (95W, $317) - 4C/8T, 3.4 GHz, 1MB L2, 8MB L3
Intel (Ivy Bridge) Core i7 3770K (77W, $332) - 4C/8T, 3.5 GHz, 1MB L2, 8MB L3
Intel (Ivy Bridge) Core i7 3770K (77W, $332) - 4C/8T, 3.5 GHz, 1MB L2, 8MB L3
Product Ratings & Comparisons
z(Retired) Dragon Age Origins - 1680 x 1050 - Max Settings (no AA/Vsync)
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
156
160.9
z(Retired) Dawn of War II - 1680 x 1050 - Ultra Settings
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
85.2
93.8
z(Retired) World of Warcraft
FRAPS Runthrough - FPS - Higher is Better
FRAPS Runthrough - FPS - Higher is Better
118.5
129.8
z(Retired) Starcraft 2
1024 x 768 - Medium Graphics, Ultra CPU Settings
1024 x 768 - Medium Graphics, Ultra CPU Settings
62.6
71.9
z(Retired) Metro 2033 Frontline Benchmark - 1024 x 768 - DX11 High Quality
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
96.5
102
z(Retired) Metro 2033 Frontline Benchmark - 1920 x 1200 - DX11 High Quality
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
53.5
54.5
z(Retired) DiRT 3 - Aspen Benchmark - 1024 x 768 Low Quality
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
173.3
180.3
z(Retired) DiRT 3 - Aspen Benchmark - 1920 x 1200 High Quality
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
102.6
109.1
z(Retired) Crysis Warhead Assault Benchmark - 1680 x 1050 Mainstream DX10 64-bit
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Average Frames per Second - Higher is Better
119
121.7
z(Retired) Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
128.1
144.3
z(Retired) Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
128.1
144.3
z(Retired) Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
128.1
144.3
z(Retired) Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Full Render Score in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
128.1
144.3
z(Retired) Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality
No Render Score (CPU test) in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
No Render Score (CPU test) in Frames per Second - Higher is Better
128.1
144.3
z(Retired) SYSMark 2007 - Overall
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
274
303
z(Retired) SYSMark 2007 - E-Learning
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
244
308
z(Retired) SYSMark 2007 - Video Creation
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
255
293
z(Retired) SYSMark 2007 - Productivity
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
283
276
z(Retired) SYSMark 2007 - 3D
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
318
340
z(Retired) Adobe Photoshop CS4 - Retouch Artists Speed Test
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
11.3
10.3
z(Retired) DivX 6.8.5 Encode (Xmpeg 5.0.3)
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
29.1
26.9
z(Retired) x264 HD Encode Test - 1st pass - x264 0.59.819
Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
106.4
115.5
z(Retired) x264 HD Encode Test - 2nd pass - x264 0.59.819
Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
Frames Per Second - Higher is Better
36.3
39.9
z(Retired) Windows Media Encoder 9 x64
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
20
18
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc 3dsmax 8 CPU Test
CPU Rendering Composite Score - Higher is Better
CPU Rendering Composite Score - Higher is Better
20.1
21.8
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Radiosity
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
8.405
8.369
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Throne Shadowmap
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
6.24
5.811
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - CBALLS2
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
3.41
3.088
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SinglePipe2
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
13.098
11.846
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - Underwater
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
14.452
13.067
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - SpaceFlyby
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
18.215
16.527
z(Retired) 3dsmax r9 - SPECapc - UnderwaterEscape
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Render Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
16.118
14.515
z(Win7) Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
6397
7017
z(Win7) Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
24933
26983
z(Retired) POV-Ray 3.7 beta 23 - SMP Benchmark
CPU Score in PPS - Higher is Better
CPU Score in PPS - Higher is Better
4875
5408
z(Retired) Par2 - Multi-Threaded par2cmdline 0.4
Time to Recover 57.2MB from 707.5MB Archive in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time to Recover 57.2MB from 707.5MB Archive in Seconds - Lower is Better
17.3
14.9
z(Retired) Blender 2.48a Character Render
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
40.1
34.3
z(Retired) Microsoft Excel 2007 SP1 - Monte Carlo Simulation
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
11.1
10
z(Retired) Sorenson Squeeze Pro 5 - Flash Video Creation
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
72.7
67.9
z(Retired) WinRAR 3.8 Compression - 300MB Archive
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
Time in Seconds - Lower is Better
59.6
57.7
z(Win 7) x264 HD Benchmark - 1st pass - v3.03
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
97.1
106.41
z(Win 7) x264 HD Benchmark - 2nd pass - v3.03
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
Frames per Second - Higher is Better
38.8
42.72
z(Win7) 7-zip Benchmark (Win7)
32MB Dictionary - Total MIPS - Higher is Better
32MB Dictionary - Total MIPS - Higher is Better
21715
23668
z(Retired) Idle Power Consumption (Win7/Radeon HD 5870)
Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
74
75
z(Retired) Load Power Consumption x264 HD 3.03 1st pass (Win7/Radeon HD 5870)
Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
Total System Power Consumption in Watts - Lower is Better
128
128.3
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - Overall
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
212
228
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - Office Productivity
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
176
189
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - Media Creation
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
197
218
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - Web Development
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
221
235
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - Data/Financial Analysis
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
268
277
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - 3D Modeling
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
234
260
z(Retired) SYSMark 2012 - System Management
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better
187
200
z(Retired) Build Chromium Project - Visual Studio 2010
Compile Time in Minutes - Lower is Better
Compile Time in Minutes - Lower is Better
18.6
17.7
z(Win 7) TrueCrypt 7.1 Benchmark (AES Performance)
Mean Encryption/Decryption AES Algorithm - GB/s
Mean Encryption/Decryption AES Algorithm - GB/s
3.7
3.9
z(Win7) Cinebench 11.5 - Single Threaded
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
1.56
1.66
z(Win7) Cinebench 11.5 - Multi-Threaded
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
7.48
7.9
z(Win7) 3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
120.39
126.57
z(Win7) 3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
653.1
698.01
z(Win 7) Dolphin Emulation Benchmark
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
11.57
10.67
z(Win 7) Cinebench R15 - Single Threaded
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
135
143
z(Win7) Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
Score in CBMarks - Higher is Better
672
708
z(Retired) SYSmark 2014 - Office Productivity
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
1339
1412
z(Retired) SYSmark 2014 - Media Creation
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
1666
1780
z(Retired) SYSmark 2014 - Data and Financial Analysis
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
2213
2356
z(Retired) SYSmark 2014 - Overall
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)
1703
1809
z(Win 7) Sunspider 1.0.2
Time in Milliseconds (Lower is Better)
Time in Milliseconds (Lower is Better)
164
153
z(Win 7) Kraken 1.1
Time in Milliseconds (Lower is Better)
Time in Milliseconds (Lower is Better)
1071
981
z(Win 7) WebXPRT
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
2420
2448
z(Win 7) Google Octane v2
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
31147
33752
z(Win 7) FastStone Image Viewer 4.9
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
46
43
z(Win 7) WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
63.66
55.8
z(Win 7) HandBrake v0.9.9 LQ Film
Frames Per Second
Frames Per Second
423.68
460.09
z(Win 7) HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K
Frames Per Second
Frames Per Second
15.5
19.33
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1: Align Photos
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
6.51
6.34
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2: Build Point Cloud
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
12
8.84
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3: Build Mesh
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
3.48
3.21
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4: Build Texture
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
1.45
1.4
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
Time in Minutes (Lower is Better)
23.44
19.79
z(Win7) Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - CPU Mapping Speed
Million Points Per Second
Million Points Per Second
100
138
z(Win 7) Hybrid x265, 4K Video
Frames Per Second
Frames Per Second
1.29
1.37
z(Win 7) POV-Ray 3.7 Beta RC4
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
1323
1429
z(Win7) 3DMark Ice Storm Ultimate (Processor Graphics)
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
42363
56516
z(Win7) 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill (Processor Graphics)
Million Pixels Per Second
Million Pixels Per Second
0.97
1.12
z(Win7) 3DMark Vantage Texel Fill (Processor Graphics)
Million Texels Per Second
Million Texels Per Second
4.56
6.1
Linux-Bench c-ray 1.1 (Hard)
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better)
139
127
Linux-Bench 7-Zip Compression
MIPS (Higher is Better)
MIPS (Higher is Better)
19692
21507
Linux-Bench 7-Zip Decompression
MIPS (Higher is Better)
MIPS (Higher is Better)
21354
22806
Linux-Bench NAMD Molecular Dynamics
Steps Per Unit Time (Higher is Better)
Steps Per Unit Time (Higher is Better)
5.34
5.76
Linux-Bench NPB Fluid Dynamics
Million OPS per second per thread (Higher is Better)
Million OPS per second per thread (Higher is Better)
1665
1770
Linux-Bench OpenSSL Sign
Signing Per Second (Higher is Better)
Signing Per Second (Higher is Better)
539
522
Linux-Bench OpenSSL Verification
Verifications Per Second (Higher is Better)
Verifications Per Second (Higher is Better)
33936
32855
Linux-Bench Redis Memory-Key Store, 1x
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
30488
31546
Linux-Bench Redis Memory-Key Store, 10x
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
104167
108696
Linux-Bench Redis Memory-Key Store, 100x
Score (Higher is Better)
Score (Higher is Better)
102041
107527
z(Win7) Alien Isolation on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)
720p Ultra Settings, Average Frame Rate
720p Ultra Settings, Average Frame Rate
29.96
30.39
z(Win7) Alien Isolation on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
123.64
123.32
z(Win7) Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
175.59
178.48
z(Win7) Alien Isolation on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
73.61
83.12
z(Win7) Alien Isolation on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
132.21
137.88
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on Integrated Graphics
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
13.3
19.8
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
31.4
31.7
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
27
27.4
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
33
35.5
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
20
20.6
z(Win 7) Total War: Attila on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
14.7
16.2
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on Integrated Graphics
1080p Medium Settings, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Medium Settings, Average Frames Per Second
13.24
18.03
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)
1080p Medium Settings, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Medium Settings, Average Frames Per Second
45.1
46.44
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
77.2
81.12
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
154.04
160.8
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
107.87
109.47
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
77.1
80.62
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Medium Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Medium Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
37.79
38.13
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on Integrated Graphics [Minimum FPS]
1080p Medium Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Medium Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
12.5
14.38
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
65.85
66.84
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
119.61
130.25
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
95.61
94.18
z(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
66.55
68.11
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
42.38
42.65
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70) [Minimum FPS]
720p Low Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
32.91
32.43
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
90.66
91.55
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
56.51
62.48
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
98.13
99.92
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
62.97
54.16
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
47.51
53.96
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
12.39
14.88
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Average Frames Per Second
35.41
46.53
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240) [Minimum FPS]
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
1080p Ultra, Minimum Frames Per Second
12.23
15.24
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
38.17
38.38
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
29.99
29.95
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
39.17
39.33
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
32.03
30.7
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
14.99
19.06
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
8.9
11.65
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Average Frames Per Second
15.22
19.4
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings, Minimum Frames Per Second
8.67
9.51
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on 2x ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
4K Ultra Settings in SLI, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings in SLI, Average Frames Per Second
67.89
69.42
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on 2x ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings in SLI, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings in SLI, Minimum Frames Per Second
41.24
38.31
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on 2x MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
4K Ultra Settings in Crossfire, Average Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings in Crossfire, Average Frames Per Second
64.51
65.57
z(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on 2x MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380) [Minimum FPS]
4K Ultra Settings in Crossfire, Minimum Frames Per Second
4K Ultra Settings in Crossfire, Minimum Frames Per Second
21.51
23.5
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on Integrated Graphics
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
10.96
27.21
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on Integrated Graphics [Under 60 FPS]
720p Low Settings, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
720p Low Settings, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
100
99.79
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
720p Low Settings, Average Frames Per Second
65.9
67.21
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70) [Under 60 FPS]
720p Low Settings, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
720p Low Settings, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
43.91
38.2
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
69.21
71.28
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) [Under 60 FPS]
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
30.22
28.88
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
47.75
49.47
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245) [Under 60 FPS]
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
97.08
93.38
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
37.99
38.26
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240) [Under 60 FPS]
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
97.89
97.91
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
1080p Very High, Average Frames Per Second
55.23
57.1
z(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380) [Under 60 FPS]
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
1080p Very High, Percentage Frames over 16.6ms
78.89
69.32
z(Win 7) Power Delta (Long Idle to OCCT)
Watts
Watts
89
79
Facebook
Twitter
RSS