• What
    is this?
    You've landed on the AMD Portal on AnandTech. This section is sponsored by AMD. It features a collection of all of our independent AMD content, as well as Tweets & News from AMD directly. AMD will also be running a couple of huge giveaways here so check back for those.
    PRESENTED BY

Kicking off a busy day for professional graphics, AMD is first up to announce that they will be launching a quartet of new FirePro cards. As part of the company’s gradual FirePro refresh that began with the W9100 in April and followed by W8100 in June, today AMD is gearing up to refresh the rest of their FirePro lineup with new products for the mid-range and low-end segments of the pro graphics market.

Being announced today are the FirePro W7100, W5100, W4100, and W2100. These parts are based on a range of AMD GPUs – including Tonga, a new GPU that has yet to show up in any other AMD products – and are designed to the sub-$2500 market segment that the current W8100 tops out at. With a handful of exceptions, the bulk of these upgrades are straightforward, focused on making AMD’s entire FirePro lineup 4K capable, improving performance across the board, and doubling the amount of VRAM compared to the past generation to allow for larger data sets to be used.

AMD FirePro W Series Specification Comparison
  AMD FirePro W7100 AMD FirePro W5100 AMD FirePro W4100 AMD FirePro W2100
Stream Processors 1792 768 512 320
ROPs ? 16 16 8
Core Clock ? 930MHz 630MHz 630MHz
Memory Clock 5GHz GDDR5 6GHz GDDR5 5.5GHz GDDR5 1.8GHz DDR3
Memory Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit 128-bit 128-bit
VRAM 8GB 4GB 4GB 2GB
Double Precision ? 1/16 1/16 1/16
TDP 150W 75W 50W 26W
GPU Tonga Bonaire Cape Verde Oland
Architecture GCN 1.1? GCN 1.1 GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Display Outputs 4 4 4 2

Starting at the top, from a technical perspective the W7100 is the most interesting of the new FirePro cards. Whereas the previous-generation W7000 was based on a second-tier version of AMD’s venerable Tahiti GPU, the W7100 gets a brand new GPU entirely, one that we haven’t seen before. Named Tonga, this new GPU is a smaller, lower performance part that slots in under the Hawaii GPU used in the W9100 and W8100. However while AMD is announcing the W7100 today they are not disclosing any additional information on Tonga, so while we can draw some basic conclusions from W7100’s specifications a complete breakdown of this new GPU will have to wait for another day.

From a specification point of view AMD is not disclosing the GPU clockspeed or offering any floating point throughput performance numbers, but we do know that W7100 will feature 1792 stream processors. Coupled with that is 8GB of GDDR5 clocked at 5GHz sitting on a 256-bit memory bus.

The W7100 is designed to be a significant step up compared to the outgoing W7000. Along with the doubling W7000’s memory from 4GB to 8GB, the Tonga GPU in W7100 inherits Hawaii’s wider geometry front-end, allowing W7100 to process 4 triangles/clock versus W7000’s 2 tris/clock. Overall compute/rendering performance should also greatly be increased due to the much larger number of stream processors (1792 vs. 1280), but without clockspeeds we can’t say for sure.

Like the W7000 before it, the W7100 is equipped with 4 full size DisplayPorts, allowing for a relatively large number of monitors to be used with the card. And because it gets AMD's newest GCN display controller, W7100 is particularly well suited for 4K displays, being able to drive 3 4K@60Hz displays or 4 4K displays if some operate at 30Hz.

In AMD’s product stack the W7100 is designed be a budget alternative to the W9100 and W8100, offering reduced performance but at a much lower cost. AMD is primarily targeting the engineering and media markets with the W7100, as its compute performance and 8GB of VRAM should be enough for most engineering workloads, or alternatively its VRAM capacity and ability to drive 4 4K displays makes it a good fit for 4K video manipulation.

The second card being introduced today is the W5100. This part is based on AMD’s Bonaire GPU, a GCN 1.1 GPU that has been in AMD’s portfolio for over a year now but has not made it into a FirePro part until now. W5100 replaces the outgoing W5000, which was a heavily cut-down Pitcairn part.

In terms of specifications, the W5100 utilizes a slightly cut-down version of Bonaire with 768 SPs active. It is clocked at approximately 910MHz, which puts its compute performance at 1.4 TFLOPS for single precision. Feeding W5100 is 4GB of VRAM attached to a 128-bit memory bus and clocked at 6GHz.

Compared to the outgoing W5000 the W5100 gains the usual VRAM capacity upgrades that the rest of the Wx100 cards have seen, while the other specifications are a mixed bag on paper. Compute performance is only slightly improved – from 1.28 TFLOPS to 1.4 TFLOPS – and memory bandwidth has actually gone regressed slightly from 102GB/sec. Consequently the biggest upgrade will be found in memory bound scenarios, otherwise the W5100’s greatest improvements would be from its GCN 1.1 lineage.

Speaking of which, with 4 full size DisplayPorts the W5100 has the same 4K display driving capabilities as the W7100. However with lower performance and half the VRAM, it’s decidedly a mid-range card and AMD treats it as such. This means it’s targeted towards lower power usage scenarios where the high compute performance and 8GB+ VRAM capacities of the W7100 and higher aren’t needed.

The third of today’s new FirePro cards is the W4100. Based on AMD’s older Cape Verde GPU, this is not the first time that Cape Verde has appeared in a FirePro product. But it is the first time that it has appeared in a workstation part, its previous appearance being the display wall niche W600. At the same time the W4100 doesn’t have a true analogue in AMD’s previous generation FirePro stack, which stopped at the W5000, so the W4100 marks a newer, lower priced and lower performance tier for FirePro.

With just 512 SPs active the W4100 tops out at only 50W power consumption, reflecting the fact that it is targeted towards lower power use cases. AMD has paired the card with 2GB of VRAM, and based on Cape Verde’s capabilities we expect that this is on a 128-bit bus. AMD has not provided any more technical details on the card, but it goes without saying that this is not a card meant to be a performance powerhouse.

AMD’s target market for this is lightweight 2D and 3D workloads such as finance and entry level CAD. The 4 mini-DisplayPorts allow the card to directly drive up to 4 displays, though because this is a GCN 1.0 GPU it doesn’t have the same flexibility of the W5100.

The final FirePro card being introduced today is the FirePro W2100, which is AMD’s new entry-level FirePro card. Like the W4100 it had no true analogue in AMD’s older product stack, but functionally it replaces the old Turks based V4900, a card which AMD kept around even after the launch of GCN to serve as their entry level FirePro product.

W2100 is based on AMD’s Oland GPU, which marks the first time that this existing AMD GPU has appeared in a FirePro product. W2100 uses a cut down version of Oland with 320 SPs active and attached to 2GB of memory on a 128-bit bus. Oland is a very limited functionality GPU, and while it’s more than suitable for basic imaging it should be noted that it doesn’t have a video decoder.

At a TDP of just 26W, the W2100 is AMD’s lowest power, lowest performance card. Functionally it’s a cheaper alternative to the W4100 for users who don’t need to drive 4 displays, with W2100 featuring just 2 DisplayPorts. The targeted market is otherwise similar, with a focus on lightweight 2D and 3D workloads over 1-2 monitors.

Meanwhile along with today’s product announcements AMD is also announcing that they will be bringing their low-level Mantle API over to the FirePro family. The nature of the pro graphics market means that it will likely be some time before we see Mantle put in meaningful use here since the API is still under development, but once AMD gets the API locked down they believe that Mantle can offer many of the same benefits for professional graphics workloads as it can gaming. The greatly reduced draw call overhead should be a boon here for many 3D workloads, and Mantle’s ability to more easily transition between compute and graphics workloads would map well towards engineering tasks that want to do both at the same time.

Wrapping things up, AMD has not revealed final pricing for these cards at this time, though we expect pricing to follow the previous generation W series cards. Meanwhile the W2100, W4100, and W5100 will be available next month. Otherwise no doubt owing to its use of the new Tonga GPU, W7100 will be farther out, with availability expected in Q4 of this year.

POST A COMMENT

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • Senti - Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - link

    I have being using several AMD and nV workstation and "gaming" cards and I can say that I like FrePros the least. Awful loud reference cooler with no alternative as Radeon line has and quite bad drivers. Seriously, killing Aero when enabling 10-bit color when on Quadro it just works? When installed both FirePro and Radeon drivers they conflict with each other?! I can see why industry doesn't like FirePro at all even when they are much cheaper than Quardo cards. Reply
  • mapesdhs - Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - link


    So it's the same as it's often been in the past with gamer cards from each vendor:

    Price? Often AMD has the edge.
    Quality? NVIDIA has the edge.
    Performance? Bounces back & forth.

    No wonder pro users tend to favour NVIDIA, since such users are the very people who
    will be happy to pay extra if necessary for a more stable platform.

    Ian.
    Reply
  • Senti - Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - link

    Not really. It was only talk about workstation line.
    For "gaming" line Radeons are better in like everything if you don't touch bad reference coolers. Even drivers: proper OpenCL support, OpenGL is not crippled, 10-bit output is possible,...
    Reply
  • tcube - Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - link

    Why would you want to run drivers for both since it's a known fact you need to do a completelly clean install when you swith from one to the other. Also why would you run anything in 10bit color scheme? Just curious! Reply
  • Senti - Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - link

    Drivers: because I usually want 2 cards installed: cheap workstation for workstation-quality specifics in programs and "gaming" for compute workload. With nV you can even install just one "gaming" driver and it would recognize workstation card (and even with most workstation features working anyway), with AMD you have to install separate ones and they are way less happy to work together than nV ones.

    10-bit: not sure what your question is about, 10-bit is per component, so total is 30-bit color which is obviously better than 24-bit for capable applications.
    Reply
  • tcube - Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - link

    Well, i have no idea how the 2 driversets work together but i suspect that this problem is due to the less matured pro line drivers. AMDs pro line is after all a newish effort. As to the 10bit i'm still not 100% i got it, true collors use 32bit definitions and is way out of human spectrum. I don't think there are more then 10 people on the planet capable of making a distinction between 1 increment of shade in 32bit. Also i don't think normal people can distinct 16bit shades at 1 increment distance. Anyway should't the number be something like 10.6.. bit/chanel? A round 30bit souns really odd since it's not divisible by 8... just saying. That is why the question. Reply
  • Senti - Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - link

    There is no 32-bit color. "32-bit" is actually 24-bit color + 8 bit wasted for padding (or alpha where it's needed). 10-bit per channel is still packed in 32-bit, but for padding/alpha only 2 bits are used.

    Plenty of people can distinguish 8-bit and 10-bit gradients easily (on good monitor, of course). And in special circumstances I can even distinguish individual steps of 10-bit gradient, so it's not a limit of human eye perception yet.
    Reply
  • tcube - Thursday, August 14, 2014 - link

    Thanks for the info & explanation, i think i got it now! Reply
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - link

    Even though it doesn't matter since it will be in a case, that W7100 is a fantastic looking card. So sleek and slim for something of that performance level (presumably at or above the R9 280X). Reply
  • hechacker1 - Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - link

    I agree. I have a 6950 I've been wanting to replace. This will probably give better performance, in a 1 slot design (that's rare to find now). And if I could SLI them... Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now