At the beginning of 2012 Broadcom announced its first 802.11ac chipsets under the banner of 5G (5th generation) WiFi. Since then we've seen the latest high end notebooks adopt 802.11ac, as well as a handful of flagship smartphones and tablets. The first generation of 802.11ac devices brought 80MHz channels and 256-QAM to a 5GHz interface that enabled real transfer speeds of as much as 600/900Mbps (TCP/UDP) for a 3-antenna/3-stream solution.

The second generation of 802.11ac enables a few optional (WiFi Alliance certified) features:

1) 4-stream configurations (up from 3-stream previously)
2) up to 160MHz channels (up from 80MHz), and
3) Multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO)

The first point increases max PHY rate with 80MHz channels to 1.73Gbps (up from 1.33Gbps for a 3-stream/80MHz solution). The second feature can further increase performance, while the third feature is the one we really want to talk about today.

The difference between SU-MIMO (Single User MIMO) and MU-MIMO (Multi User MIMO) is pretty simple. In the SU case, each device gets full exclusive access to the AP's bandwidth for a given timeslice before moving on to the next one. This works beautifully for many-stream MIMO devices (e.g. a 3x3 3-stream notebook) as each device can easily use up all of the bandwidth the AP has to offer. In reality though, you're likely to have a number of devices attached to the network that support only 1 or 2 streams (think: tablets or smartphones). In the case of a SU-MIMO network with a 3 or 4 stream 802.11ac AP and a bunch of 1 or 2-stream clients, you'll end up with a lot of unused bandwidth capacity on the AP for any given timeslice. Each device is served sequentially, and a single stream device can only use a fraction of the AP's total bandwidth. This really becomes a problem when you oversubscribe the AP (e.g. think of the coffee shop or airport use case).

With MU-MIMO however it is possible to form groups of multiple devices that can be served at the same time. Through beam forming a MU-MIMO access point can group together multiple MU-MIMO aware devices into a single transmission slot. In the case of a 4x4 MU-MIMO AP, grouping even three clients in the same transmission slot would greatly increase the efficiency of the network - allowing it to support even more connected clients.

Today Qualcomm is announcing its complete lineup of MU-MIMO enabled WiFi chipsets. There are four chipsets on the infrastructure side (think: APs) and four on the client side. You need both to get the full benefits, but as long as you have a MU-MIMO AP and some MU-MIMO clients even SU-MIMO clients will benefit from the improved efficiency on the network.

Qualcomm 802.11ac MU-MIMO Products
  QCA
9980
QCA
9982
QCA
9990
QCA
9992
QCA
6174
QCA
3680
QCA
9378
QCA
6574
Target Market Residential Routers / 
Gateways
Enterprise APs Mobile & Computing Consumer Electronics Auto
Max Antenna Configuration 4x4 4-stream 3x3 3-stream 4x4 4-stream 3x3 3-stream 2x2 2-stream 1x1 1- stream 2x2 2-stream 2x2 2-stream
Max Channel Bandwidth 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz 80MHz
Max Link Rate 1.73
Gbps
1.3
Gbps
1.73
Gbps
1.3
Gbps
867
Mbps
433
Mbps
867
Mbps
867
Mbps
Interface PCIe PCIe PCIe PCIe LP-PCIe Integrated into S801 PCIe, USB, SDIO Integrated
Bluetooth 4.1 N N N N Y Y Y Y

None of the MU-MIMO solutions support 160MHz channels, but through the addition of a fourth stream on some solutions we get max link rates of 1.73Gbps. You'll notice some feature overlap between the enterprise and residential AP solutions, the only difference there is really on the feature side as enterprise APs tend to be a bit more specific in their requirements.

On the device side, Snapdragon 801 platforms that use Qualcomm's integrated 1-stream 802.11ac WiFi will already support MU-MIMO with nothing more than a software update (the device vendor needs to actually offer that update however). The QCA6174 will be the 2-stream MU-MIMO 802.11ac discrete solution to keep an eye out for in tablets/smartphones.

Enabling MU-MIMO is a big deal for improving the carrying capacity of larger 802.11ac networks. For the sake of having a good experience on public networks, I do hope that when we eventually see the shift to 802.11ac in more places we'll see it happen with MU-MIMO APs. Qualcomm isn't expecting announcements based around any of these solutions until the end of this year at the earliest, with product availability sometime in Q1 next year.

POST A COMMENT

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    Should be ok now! Reply
  • ltcommanderdata - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    There are four lights! Reply
  • HigherState - Saturday, April 05, 2014 - link

    Nice TNG reference Reply
  • ZeDestructor - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    Thank you. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    Chrome Version 33.0.1750.154 on Win 7 x64 Enterprise. I could see all 8 columns and still can. Reply
  • azazel1024 - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    Maybe Qualcomms products are different, but reading up on MU:MIMO, I thought a MU:MIMO basestation and client were ONLY required to support multiuser Tx AND Rx. With a MU:MIMO basestation it would still support multiuser Tx, its just that Rx from the clients would be limited to round robin CDMA limitations. Reply
  • extide - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    It would actually be TDMA, not CDMA, in that case :) Reply
  • MikhailT - Thursday, April 03, 2014 - link

    Wait, am I misreading the table but is there no new ac chipset for the notebooks? It's still stuck at 3x3? Reply
  • BMNify - Saturday, April 05, 2014 - link

    11ac kit today irritates me in that the spec clearly states up to 8x8 Ariel/transceiver configurations 160MHz and 8 In tokens 8bits/symbol are consumed for 256QAM ( why no 4096-QAM that provides 12 bits/symbol today) and yet we are still at crappy 2x2/3x3 and even single channel in mobile devices today....

    its simple to print mass produce fractal Ariel's inside cases and so 8x8 would fit perfectly fine in any mobile device today so take the the spec and make at least some full spec devices we can and actually want to buy today...

    even these new SOC are only using 80MHz 4x4 at best, wheres the incentive to buy slow kit today
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now