Corsair Obsidian 250D Exterior

Externally, the Obsidian 250D can be easily described as the cubic variation of the Obsidian 350D, the micro ATX case that Corsair introduced last April. The Obsidian 250D is 16 cm shorter and 9 cm less deep as its larger micro ATX brother, yet it is about 7 cm wider. As a result, even though the case is shorter and not as deep, the volume of the case is reduced by about 30% (≈0.028 cubic meters against the ≈0.042 cubic meters of the Obsidian 350D). Although Corsair has not officially disclosed the weight of the Obsidian 250D, the sample that we received tipped the scales at about 5 kg, which is about half the weight of an average simple ATX tower case.

Corsair went with a modern, post-minimalistic design with the Obsidian 250D. It is a case of clean lines and basic geometric shapes, with an addition of a top panel window and a brushed aluminum fascia with the company logo imprinted on it. The frame of the case and the side/top panels are made out of 1 mm SECC steel, while the front panel is made out of 2 mm thick plastic. The front panel also forms the two front feet of the Obsidian 250D, while the rear plastic feet are each attached to the metallic chassis. Considering the size of the case, the feet are quite tall, elevating the metallic frame of the Obsidian 250D about 2 cm above the surface. The aluminum front covers are no more than thin sheets of metal attached to the plastic frame beneath them and have been added for aesthetic purposes only.

Two USB 3.0 ports and two 3.5" audio jacks (headphones, microphone) can be found at the top right side of the aluminum fascia. The top right side is also home to a tiny circular reset button and the power on button, a ≈4 cm long stripe with the two case LED lights (power and HDD activity) integrated inside it. In between the buttons and the front I/O ports, there is a single 5.25" bay for an optical device.

The rest of the aluminum fascia actually is a large door, which can be opened by applying pressure to both of the top corners simultaneously. Once opened, the door will lean forward by about 45 degrees, giving direct access to the intake fan filter behind it, making cleaning of the front filter a trivial procedure.

Both side panels of the Obsidian 250D have large openings with integrated fan filters. Cleaning these fan filters will unfortunately not be as easy as the front filter, as the panels will have to be removed in order to access them. Both openings are about 280 mm wide by 140 mm high, with the right side panel opening right next the exhaust fan(s) or liquid cooler radiator and the left side panel opening right next to the intake of the GFX card fans. This design allows a powerful GFX card to draw cool air directly from the exterior of the case, which will definitely improve its thermal performance; however, it can also backfire if the user is far too negligent, as the filter could gather so many particles that it may become entirely clogged, leaving almost no space for the GFX card cooler to draw air from. This does not mean that the filters of the case require cleaning too frequently; depending on the environment, the filters may require cleaning anywhere between some weeks and up to several months.

The rear side of the Obsidian 250D is rather interesting, because it not only illustrates the internal design of the case but also gives access to the installation of disk drives and the PSU. The Obsidian 250D is split into two compartments; the bottom half is home to the HDD cage and the PSU partition, while the top half is meant to hold the main system, with the motherboard placed horizontally. Obviously, the orientation of the motherboard is why the window has been installed on the top panel of the case as well.

Corsair Obsidian 250D: Introduction and packaging Corsair Obsidian 250D Interior
Comments Locked

52 Comments

View All Comments

  • J.Griff - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    I take that back, after reading bit techs review : 0 it all but beats every itx case in cooling, except when the node 304 is running on high speed fan mode. So it's between the 250d and 304. Both the best itx cases in certain aspects, equally good choices depending on whether you value size, node 304 being a bit smaller and room for more hard drive space, or the 250d with it's better layout and the ability to customize more.
  • rocktober13 - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    I like the move to Mini ITX cases but it still seems like there is a lot of excess space in these cases (Bitfenix, Fractal Node, etc). I want to see more along the lines of the EVGA Hadron series, but at a lower price point. The Hadron fits all the same components in half the volume.
  • J.Griff - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    True but it's going most certainly going to run noiser and hotter than the node or 250d, so screw that. Lol. Until the steam box console like layout cases come about these 2 are pretty much unbeatable cases IMO.
  • rocktober13 - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    I am not a fan of the box shape either, so I will probably have to wait for a steam machine. I would be curious to see how the temp and noise of the Hadron compared to the node or 250d though.
  • sleepytea - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link

    the Silverstone RVZ01 is not far off. I don't like the style of that case, but the ML07 will be another option. I'm leaning more and more towards the SG08, but if the ML07 has the temps and noise level to match it could be an excellent competitor. I'm skeptical that the SFX PSU format will help things along in that regard, but at the same time Silverstone is potentially putting out a 600W SFW unit the SG08 may get a Lite version.
  • lmcd - Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - link

    SG08 and such!
  • pierrot - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link

    meh, too big which defeats the purpose of itx imo and not that great looking
  • bracka - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link

    Isn't a 30W payload for each HDD a massive overkill? I am concerned that due to different HDD placement's between cases there could be high variation in CPU heater temps as a result of pre-heated air.

    Liked the review. Can't wait fore more. Would like to see Bitfenix Phenom matx!
  • dj_aris - Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - link

    Do I see a mITX with a BGA cpu (presumably a C837 / C1007) and then a GTX770 added? I really wonder how this system performs if it's available to run some tests.

    By the way, καλή αρχή πατριώτη!
  • E.Fyll - Thursday, January 23, 2014 - link

    Well, I will see what I can do about that. Although, it is given that the CPU would be a serious bottleneck here, even though it is better than an Atom.

    Thank you. :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now