The 2013 MacBook Air Review (13-inch)
by Anand Lal Shimpi on June 24, 2013 12:01 AM ESTMore GPU Performance Numbers
The next set of benchmarks are taken from our 2013 Laptop Bench. Here we're comparing to HD 4000 and HD 4400, both using Acer S7s. Compared to HD 4400 the HD 5000 in Apple's 2013 MBA ends up being around 15% faster in most tests. Compared to Ivy Bridge/HD 4000 the gap ranges from lower single digits in thermally constrained environments to 25% or 40% in the best case scenarios.
3DMark GPU Performance
We close out our look at Intel's HD 5000 performance using a historical collection of 3DMark data. The comparison gives us some more data points to characterize Intel's HD 5000. The data here is all best case scenario for HD 5000 as there are no situations where we hit thermal limits.
On average, Intel's HD 4400 ends up being 18% faster than HD 4000, while Intel's HD 5000 is 31% faster.
233 Comments
View All Comments
darwinosx - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
They are not biased and you don't understand the meaning of the word.MonkeyPaw - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
Just a thought, but how about stating your concerns via constructive criticism or in the form of a question. Crying bias while continuing to visit (and therefore, support) any website just doesn't make much sense since you will be dismissed as a troll by the very people you are hoping to influence.CalaverasGrande - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
Frankly I think users that expect to play heavy 3D games on a MacBook Air with chipset video bought the wrong computer. They should have spent a few hundred more for a 15" MBP with discrete graphics. Or if they really care about games they should hop the fence and go get an Asus or some other Windows gaming notebook.Intel's HD4000 graphics are better than previous Intel video attempts, but still pretty weak compared to other vid chips. It's also using system ram, not dedicated ram.
As stated, this is the mobility platform, not the performance platform.
CalaverasGrande - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
oops, HD5000.darwinosx - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
Nobody does. But the HD 5000 is quite capable for some games.hyrule4927 - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
The lack of thermal data in these Mac reviews is rather frustrating. If this data is included in all other PC reviews in Anandtech, why is it completely ignored when reviewing Apple products? They certainly aren't immune to heat/throttling problems.darwinosx - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
You didn't read the article you are commenting on.hyrule4927 - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
If you would like to tell me where specific CPU temperature data is given, be my guest. All I see is an anecdote about fan noise and speculation about throttling in several tests.darwinosx - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
Prove that Samsung makes a better screen than LG. I bet you can't tell the difference.spronkey - Monday, June 24, 2013 - link
Samsung LCDs might have slightly better early quality control. LG Display have been a bit notorious for early run issues with their panels lately. But I agree - taking these away, LG has more cred as a panel maker than Samsung does.