Last year we hinted that another Thunderbolt revision would happen this year, with a speed bump in 2014. It turns out that's exactly what's being announced at NAB this week. Intel took the opportunity to unveil its first 2013 Thunderbolt controllers as well as tease next year's Thunderbolt spec update. As a refresher, Cactus Ridge was the codename of the Thunderbolt controllers that accompanied Ivy Bridge systems. Haswell gets a new set of controllers: Redwood Ridge.

Intel is announcing two this week: the DSL4510 and DSL4410. These two are replacements for Intel's current DSL3510 and DSL3310, with 4/2 and 2/1 (channels/ports) respectively. There are no performance changes other than official support for DisplayPort 1.2 (and thus 4K displays). If you connect either of these parts to a Thunderbolt display you still only get DP 1.1a support. There's still a PCIe gen 2 x4 interface on the other end of these controllers.

The Redwood Ridge parts should be a little cheaper as they integrate a 1V voltage regulator that used to be external. The integration also reduces board area by a bit. Power consumption is also lower at idle compared to Cactus Ridge, and disconnected power consumption is significantly lower (1mW vs. 7mW for Cactus Ridge). Redwood Ridge includes the appropriate hooks for Haswell's upcoming aggressive platform power management reductions. Ultimately this is the real focus behind Redwood Ridge. With Haswell, all components on the platform need to be more power efficient - Intel's own silicon included.

Next year Intel will introduce Falcon Ridge, the first real performance upgrade to Thunderbolt. Intel is only mentioning an increase in performance to 20Gbps, which I can only assume refers to signaling speed per Thunderbolt lane. If that's correct we'd be looking at a doubling in peak theoretical bandwidth over Thunderbolt, perhaps finally making this interface useful for external GPUs. No word on a release timeframe for Falcon Ridge, but my guess is that we'll see it debut around Broadwell (14nm Haswell shrink). Given that Haswell is a late Q2/Q3 launch at best, I'd say end of 2014 is likely for Falcon Ridge.

Dropping power, BOM cost and increase performance in the future are all great, but Thunderbolt adoption on the PC remains embarassing at best. There's a lot of finger pointing between Intel and Microsoft on this, but none of it matters to the end user. Apple continues to be the only platform player that seems to get Thunderbolt and take it seriously. If Intel wants Redwood or Falcon Ridge to matter, it needs to make sure that we actually see real adoption of Thunderbolt in the PC space - with backwards compatibility guaranteed between those devices that have been shipping on the market for a couple of years now.

POST A COMMENT

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • geniusloci - Tuesday, April 09, 2013 - link

    And where is USB4 going to be when TB is doing 100Gb/s ? Reply
  • mayankleoboy1 - Tuesday, April 09, 2013 - link

    Doing 200Gb/s.

    Why are you assuming that USB4 is going to have lesser bandwidth than TB ?
    Reply
  • web2dot0 - Wednesday, April 10, 2013 - link

    Right .... 200Gb/s without active components .... right. Talk alot of talk, but no actual evidence to back up their claim.

    Thunderbolt can easily get to 1Tb/s if they follow through with the technology evolution. it's simply not possible with USB without architecture change. That freaking $5 cable isn't going to get you there ....
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1 - Wednesday, April 10, 2013 - link

    Do you even know that TB is built upon the PCIe lanes ?

    " That freaking $5 cable isn't going to get you there .... "
    But it will give 100W power, and 10GB/s bandwidth.
    Reply
  • daneren2005 - Wednesday, April 10, 2013 - link

    Doing the amount people actually need at the time, for the price people actually want to pay. Reply
  • xdrol - Monday, April 08, 2013 - link

    ".. official support for DisplayPort 1.2 (and thus 4K displays). If you connect either of these parts to a Thunderbolt display you still only get DP 1.1a support."

    This is confusing, when is this just 1.1a, and when is it supporting 1.2?
    Reply
  • FeelLicks - Monday, April 08, 2013 - link

    Yeah, this part was confusing to me too.

    My take:
    Cactus Ridge = 1.1a
    Redwood Ridge = 1.2
    Reply
  • Kevin G - Monday, April 08, 2013 - link

    I think that the reference is to Apple's ThunderBolt display, not the generic idea of a display connected via Thunderbolt.

    This certainly can use some clarity.
    Reply
  • FeelLicks - Monday, April 08, 2013 - link

    Yeah, I think you are right. It means even if you use Redwood Ridge (which supports 1.2) to connect to an older Thunderbolt display, since the old display will have Cactus Ridge (port) it will still be 1.1a. Reply
  • repoman27 - Monday, April 08, 2013 - link

    This is a bit confusing, but I think the deal is that Redwood Ridge supports DP 1.2 only when operating in DisplayPort signaling mode. The DisplayPort sink to Thunderbolt protocol adapters are probably still the same as previous generation controllers, since a 10 Gbit/s channel can't carry a full DP 1.2 HBR2 main link.

    If you plug a DP 1.2 panel directly into a Thunderbolt port on the host PC, you get DP 1.2 output. If you daisy-chain through another Thunderbolt device, you only get DP 1.1a.

    I am curious if MST might still be supported though, even if HBR2 isn't.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now