We began our day at Mobile World Congress with a visit to LG's booth, where it offered hands on with its 1H 2013 lineup of smartphones. Among them is the new 5.5" Optimus G Pro, the larger brother of last year's Optimus G - the basis for the Nexus 4.

The Pro adds a 5.5" 1080p display, driven by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 600 SoC (quad-core Krait 300 running at 1.7GHz paired with an Adreno 320 GPU. Internally there's 2GB of LPDDR2 memory, and storage expansion is provided via a microSD card slot beneath the battery cover. The 3400mAh battery is removable.

The Optimus G Pro is mostly made out of plastic but the device felt good in hand. It's pretty impressive what can be done with plastic these days although it seems like metal and/or glass are necessary for the ultra high end device feel. When it comes to ensuring that a device feels rugged, there's no real replacement for plastic however.

The Pro features an IR emitter as well as an extendable DMB antenna, the latter should obviously disappear if and when this thing hits the US market.

The display itself looked wonderful at the show. The 1080p panel is very sharp, bright and contrasty. Subjectively, colors looked good at the show but we'll have to run it through our suite to get a feel for just how accurate the colors are.

The demo units at the show were running Android 4.1.2. They also featured LG's own software customizations, including the ability to view multiple apps on the screen at the same time (QSlide) and set their transparency so you can do things like have a video or calendar visible while reading a web page. The QSlide feature is clearly geared towards multitasking, similar to what Samsung has done on its Galaxy Note line. You launch QSlide enabled apps via the LG customized notifications shade, and then control their transparency using a slider at the top of each QSlide app. While semi-transparent, the app will ignore touch input allowing you to continue to interact with the app behind it. In opaque mode however you can interact with the foreground QSlide app. Although it is possible to open multiple QSlide apps at the same time, you quickly run out of screen real estate. 

Another neat feature of LG's latest Android build is Dual Recording, which is a camera customization that allows you to simultaneously record from both the front and rear facing cameras. The 13MP primary camera is limited to 720p recording in this mode.

The Optimus G Pro felt extremely quick and responsive during our hands on time at the show. Scrolling and UI performance was all very smooth. Given that we haven't had much experience with Snapdragon 600 and its Krait 300 CPU cores I ran a few tests here at the show to get a feel for what is in store from Qualcomm's performance mainstream quad-core SoC for 2013:

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark

Using Chrome, Kraken showed some great performance on the Optimus G Pro. While not quite as fast as Intel's Atom Z2460, it's a big step forward compared to the APQ8064 (Krait 200) based Nexus 4. If this data is representative of the sort of improvement we can expect from Snapdragon 600, I'll be happy.

On the graphics side, Adreno 320 is still powering things on the G Pro, although we don't know what clocks the platform at the show was using:

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD (Offscreen 1080p)

Since the Optimus G Pro uses a full HD/1080p display, the on and off-screen results are very similar. Frame rates are low enough in Egypt HD that the lack of vsync in the offscreen tests doesn't have a real impact on performance. Although respectable, I suspect that the 26 fps here is a bit lower than we'd see on production hardware since the 320 should be clocked higher in Snapdragon 600 than in the S4 Pro from last year. 

POST A COMMENT

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • Krysto - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    It seems Cortex A15 still kicks everyone's ass.

    But I don't know why people expected a huge improvement in S600. S600 is just S4 Pro at 1.7 Ghz, and with the SAME GPU as S4 Pro.
    Reply
  • kyuu - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    A15 is also a power hog, so it's hardly surprising it's going to trump as far as performance goes.

    However, I agree that it's odd that people were expecting something big from what amount to a simple refresh with slightly higher clocks. I don't even get how it can be disappointing when it's performing on-par with (if not slightly better than) the iPhone 5's SoC, which everyone was tripping out over not too long ago.
    Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Sunday, March 03, 2013 - link

    It's "hip" to be a constant rag (covering up the poorboy I cannot buy it syndrome), pretending the highest end of the known world's research and development and top production pieces are "weak", as if they screwed up and the critic expects a better job because of course the critic would do a better job given their vast knowledge and cutting edge hipness, or are a fanboy of another device for some reason, including one with lower performance as it has some other stated advantage, like less with less but with a better percentage ratio.

    I suspect however that 90% of the time selfish, self deluding neccessary, poorboy fanboy blowhard broken wallet syndrome.
    Reply
  • retrospooty - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    Yup, The CPU is plenty powerful though... I think they must be expecting the S800. Which has faster CPU clock speed, but higher end GPU, Adreno 320 vs 330 in the 800

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on...
    Reply
  • tuxRoller - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    I believe AT said there are supposed to be IPC improvments on the order of 15%.
    However, that may be only for the Snapdragon 800.
    Reply
  • coldpower27 - Wednesday, February 27, 2013 - link

    The benchmark results of the Exynos 5 are impressive, looks like CPU performance is 2x the iPhone 5, which is quite a feat, though the TDP is much greater. Reply
  • Amit kumar - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    Definitely a nice device, equally I believe your review for the reason that I got quite a few more eye catching features of this phone in this website as well. http://www.gadtecho.com/lg-optimus-pro-full-specif... Reply
  • funnyhog - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    a good concise article, though lacking in some details.

    But disappointed that even YOU are taken in by the false premise that Aluminium is a "premium" material when it is just one of the weaker, cheaper and softer plastic around!
    Reply
  • funnyhog - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    If you have not put in that comment that implies that G Pro does NOT feel high end enough because of its use of plastic, your article would have been perfect. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now