Network Streaming Performance - Netflix

The drivers for the Intel HD 4000 enable hardware accelerated decode and rendering for Netflix streams in Silverlight on Windows 7. The Windows 8 Netflix app has been a bit of a mystery where it is not readily evident as to whether hardware acceleration is present or not, and whether it is being really utilized. In this section, we will take a look at how Netflix behaves on Windows 7 and Windows 8. The ISP at my location is Comcast, and unfortunately, there is no access to the Netflix 5 Mbps Super HD streams yet.

Netflix on Windows 7

On Windows 7, Netflix needs the Silverlight plug-in to be installed. We played back our standard test stream using Internet Explorer.

The Silverlight plug-in attempts GPU acceleration and enables it on our system. Manual stream selection is available. The maximum playback quality has a bitrate of 64 kbps for the audio and 3 Mbps for the video.

We will take a look at the efficiency of the system while playing back the stream towards the end of this section.

Netflix on Windows 8

On Windows 8, Netflix is streamed through a Metro app. Fortunately, the same debug shortcut keys used in the Silverlight version work here too. A nice add-on touch is that the manual stream selection and playback statistics OSD can be made to appear simultaneously.

It is not immediately evident as to whether hardware acceleration is being utilized or not. However, the aspect which stands out immediately is the fact that the video playback bitrate can go as high as 3.85 Mbps. Audio still remains at a lowly 64 kbps. Hopefully, a future update to the Netflix app can provide us with the soundtracks available on specialized media streamers.

Netflix Power Consumption - Windows 7 vs Windows 8

While the Silverlight plug-in OSD helpfully reports that GPU acceleration is being taken advantage of, it doesn't indicate the efficiency in any way. On the other hand, the Windows 8 app doesn't report GPU acceleration status at all. To determine the actual efficiency of Netflix playback, we recorded power consumption at the wall for both scenarios over a 10 minute interval during the middle of the stream.

The graph presents some very interesting results. With Windows 8, the system consumes much less power and the stream is also of higher quality. GPU acceleration in the app makes the streaming more than 30% efficient when compared to the Silverlight version. Compared to Windows 7 Silverlight, the Netflix app is efficient by approximately 35%. Windows 8, by itself, seems to consume less power too. Considering these results, if Netflix forms any part of your HTPC usage scenario, it is a no-brainer to upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8.

General Performance Metrics Network Streaming Performance - YouTube
Comments Locked

138 Comments

View All Comments

  • damianrobertjones - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    It's hardly difficult to use Windows 8! Heck a few of the ladies in work purchased laptops for their kids over xmas with Windows 8 and they're having no issues.... WHy are you??? Makes no sense at all
  • lotharamious - Monday, January 21, 2013 - link

    No real useful advantages. But, it's $40. Oh yeah, and new task manager, new file copy dialog, storage spaces, data deduplication, WAY less naggy updates, fast boot (way faster than 7), extra dimension in your start menu for more stuff.

    Nothing at all.
  • ol1bit - Friday, January 25, 2013 - link

    My Win 7 HTPC works just fine with my network streaming Silcon Dust dual tuner.

    I rebuilt by gaming PC with Windows 8 and after a week I couldn't take it anymore, re-installed Win7-64bit.

    -Stupid UI
    -Dumbed down for Grandpa and Grandma
    - Stupid colors in office (aka none per se)
    - COD4 and older games don't work.

    Win7 has none of these issues, so if the only benefit I get is a netflix app that uses a tad less power, and a crappy UI forget it.
  • JlHADJOE - Sunday, January 27, 2013 - link

    "Fast boot" is fast because it changes normal shutdown to "hibernate".

    If you force the OS to do a proper reboot, there's no improvement over 7.
  • justniz - Monday, February 11, 2013 - link

    Actually you can do a lot more with Linux than just surf YT. Check out MythTV. It is a VERY capable PVR/HTPC suite.
    In my opinion, much better than any product available for windows, and free too.
  • SantaAna12 - Sunday, January 20, 2013 - link

    Aii yii yii!

    No I dont have Windows Pro 8.....pay up!
  • a2f - Sunday, January 20, 2013 - link

    Is there any way we could get a look at how you have configured the various settings for the LAV filters and madVR for our own personal testing?
  • Mangix - Sunday, January 20, 2013 - link

    in regards to the refresh rate issue, which i am not too familiar with, have you tried modifying the EDID in the registry to help fix it?

    link: http://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Re...
  • dubya911 - Sunday, January 20, 2013 - link

    How do the final capabilities of this compare to the plethora of android mini PCs floating around? Things like the MK802, G-Box etc seem to have a beta version of XBMC with network storage support now. Or if you want to move upscale a bit googleTV, Roku etc?

    Other than the fun of putting it together is there an upside? My napkin math puts this build north of $600. That is a lot of delta to make up.
  • edlee - Sunday, January 20, 2013 - link

    You are absolutely right.

    I have a set up One Raid -5 Xeon E2-1235 file server with a bunch of different DLNA servers programs to work with different client devices.

    for example:

    PS3 media server for my PS3
    Servio for my Sony blu-ray players and smart tv devices
    Plex for my roku
    Qloud Media server for my android clients

    This way I dont have to setup an expensive HTPC in every watching location, and the Xeon e2-1235 is comparable to i7-2600 so it has all the processing power to handle video transcoding in software, until these apps update their encode engine to take advantage of quick sync.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now