Workstation Performance

While the PCMarks and some video encoding may favor an SSD-based system (though the 15K RPM Seagate Savvio in our review unit is no slouch), the SPEC workstation benchmarks should pretty aggressively favor Lenovo's solution as the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 and dual octalcore Xeons are the highest specced parts we've yet tested.

SPECviewperf 11 (catia-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (ensight-04)

SPECviewperf 11 (lightwave-01)

SPECviewperf 11 (maya-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (proe-05)

SPECviewperf 11 (sw-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (tcvis-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (snx-01)

Any test the D30 doesn't win, it basically ties, and when it does win it often wins big. The tcvis-02 test seems to be workstation GPU dependent, and proe-05 and lightwave-01 both seem to favor the slightly faster top clock speed on the Xeon E3-1280 v2, which is able to take one core up to 4GHz; both benches are definitely banking on single-threaded performance as the major differentiator. The combination of 150W of GF100 GPU power and 300W of Xeon cores certainly gets the job done, though.

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Interactive)

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Render)

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Multitask)

Interestingly, while SPECapc Lightwave definitely sees gains from the additional eight cores, they're a little more subdued. The D30 is definitely shaving whole minutes off of the running time compared to the Z420's single E5-2687W, but the extra cores just aren't as pronounced as they are in some of the SPECviewperf tests.

Application and Futuremark Performance Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
POST A COMMENT

68 Comments

View All Comments

  • theduckofdeath - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    That is really not a clever thing to do, then you can just as well build the whole system yourself, because whenever you silk call the manufacturer for support they definitely will start the conversation with " start by removing all of those parts you bought from someone else, reinstall the whole thing, and then you call us back. Okay?" :-) Reply
  • theduckofdeath - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    *would, not silk Reply
  • Haribol - Monday, November 26, 2012 - link

    Honestly that is a rip off. If you shop around on sites like e@GAy etc..you will find a good deal. Why pay retail? I have seen systems for half the price Lenovo.com is selling them for. If you search for D30 you will see numerous systems, check it out if you are interested. And sometimes you can call the sellers and bargain. As long as they make some money they will sell it and it will be 30-50% off lenovo's website. I recently got a D30 and price was 50% cheaper then Lenovo's website. Same warranty and hardware on lenovo's website. The key is using your intelligence and shopping around. Generally regarding the warranty they will tell you to take off everything that didn't come with the system from the factory. Reply
  • Haribol - Monday, November 26, 2012 - link

    Honestly that is a rip off. If you shop around on sites like e@GAy etc..you will find a good deal. Why pay retail? I have seen systems for half the price Lenovo.com is selling them for. If you search for D30 you will see numerous systems, check it out if you are interested. And sometimes you can call the sellers and bargain. As long as they make some money they will sell it and it will be 30-50% off lenovo's website. I recently got a D30 and price was 50% cheaper then Lenovo's website. Same warranty and hardware on lenovo's website. The key is using your intelligence and shopping around. Reply
  • Zink - Thursday, November 15, 2012 - link

    quite Reply
  • rwei - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    16 cores? 32 threads? Dang.

    But then I read Johan's article.

    Man you just got one-UPPED.
    Reply
  • sna2 - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    actually you can make a 80 cores workstation today using 8x10 cores xeons thats 160 threads

    check supermicro X8OBN-F motherboard

    and X9QR7-TF
    Reply
  • Ozymankos - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    The system tested today is a standalone workstation and not a server to be used in a cluster or a supercomputer
    Therefore,it is less important to have user-serviceable power supply,as it is likely that this PSU will last for a long time for a single unit
    It has 2 octocore processors,with double the processing power of the similar Dell workstation/server
    Adn the price is only 50% higher ,so it is a good workstation for most people
    Reply
  • mapesdhs - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link


    Note that absolute CPU clock can have a major impact on Viewperf results, as I found out
    when testing a 5GHz 2700K with a Quadro 4000. See:

    http://www.sgidepot.co.uk/misc/viewperf.txt

    In many cases it leaves the results given here in the dust (eg. 83.31 for LW, 16.63 for ProE).
    The reason is some of the tests are single threaded on the CPU side or so lightly threaded
    that a higher clock makes a huge difference. If you want to run ProE, then yes have a good
    GPU, but shove it in a consumer machine with a single good oc'd 4-core or 6-core i7 and
    it'll run much quicker than one of these OEM workstations. YMMV for other apps/tasks, but
    for Viewperf it's interesting how oodles of cores at a lower clock so often loses to just one
    4-core i7 at a high clock.

    Ian.
    Reply
  • sna2 - Friday, November 16, 2012 - link

    I really cant understand the pricing of workstations ...

    here is the same exact system self made ...

    1- SUPERMICRO X9DA7 (C602 with SAS and dual Lan and usb3 ) : 524$

    2-2x Intel Xeon E5-2687W : 2x1800$ : 3600$

    3- 8x2G exx Registered : 160$

    4- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 2.5GB GDDR5 : 1750$

    5- Seagate Savvio 15K.3 300GB : 350$

    6- DVD : 50$

    7- SeaSonic X-1250 1250W GOLD : 250$

    8- Windows 64 pro : 130 $

    9- best case 500$ worth

    total 7314$

    there is no justification whatsoever for 3000$ more !!!
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now