GPU Performance

This section is particularly exciting because it's our first look at ARM's new Mali-T604 GPU in our standard mobile 3D performance suite. We've already seen the Nexus 4's Adreno 320 in action, but the Nexus 10's behavior here should be interesting to see.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Fill Test

As far as raw fillrates are concerned, both Nexus devices do quite well here at their native resolutions. The iPad and iPhone 5 are both quicker, but we're still good gains over the previous generation of hardware - particularly for the Mali-T604. Compared to the Mali-400MP4 in the Galaxy S 3, we're seeing more than 2x the performance out of ARM's latest GPU.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Fill Test (Offscreen 1080p)

At normalized resolutions the standings don't really change.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test

The T604 is ARM's first unified shader architecture, which gives it far more balanced pixel/vertex shader performance. The result is a more than 4x increase in triangle throughput compared to the Mali 400MP4. It's not enough to give the Nexus 10 the edge over the latest Apple devices, but it's a huge improvement over where ARM was in the previous generation. The Adreno 320 continues to be quite strong here as well.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test (Offscreen 1080p)

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test - Fragment Lit

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test - Fragment Lit (Offscreen 1080p)

Once again we're seeing huge gains for the Mali-T604 compared to the Mali-400MP4. The Adreno 320 in the Nexus 4 actually performs worse than the Adreno 225 in older devices, possibly due to thermal throttling we saw on the Nexus 4 sample during periods of heavy load.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test - Vertex Lit

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Triangle Texture Test - Vertex Lit (Offscreen 1080p)

ARM shows the biggest gains here once again thanks to its move to a unified shader architecture. The Adreno 320 does ok here but it's really no better than the 225, I suspect there is some thermal throttling happening on the device.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD

At native resolutions, the Nexus 10 and NExus 4 are both capable of putting out decent frame rates in Egypt HD. What this data tells us is they'll likely be able to run current and even some future titles, at native res, at 30 fps without much of an issue.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD (Offscreen 1080p)

Normalize resolution and the Mali-T604 actually does very well here, setting a new performance record. Despite being based on the same hardware, the Optimus G is able to post a much higher score here than the Nexus 4. The explanation is simple: the Optimus G can't complete a single, continuous run of GLBenchmark 2.5 - the app will run out of texture memory and crash if you try to run through the entire suite in a single setting. The outcome is that the Optimus G avoids some otherwise nasty throttling. The Nexus 4 on the other hand manages to complete everything, but likely quickly throttles its clocks down due to thermal constraints. The Nexus 4 was really hot by the end of our GLBenchmark run, which does point to some thermal throttling going on here. I do wonder if the Snapdragon S4 Pro is a bit too much for a smartphone, and is better suited for a tablet at 28nm.

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt Classic

GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt Classic (Offscreen 1080p)

The Egypt Classic numbers are less interesting, but both platforms do well here.

Battery Life

We didn't have time to run through our entire battery life suite, but we do have some relevant results for the two devices. For smartphones, these are our latest web browsing battery life tests:

We regularly load web pages at a fixed interval until the battery dies (all displays are calibrated to 200 nits as always). The differences between this test and our previous one boil down to the amount of network activity and CPU load.

On the network side, we've done a lot more to prevent aggressive browser caching of our web pages. Some caching is important otherwise you end up with a baseband test, but it's clear what we had previously wasn't working. Brian made sure that despite the increased network load, the baseband still had the opportunity to enter its idle state during the course of the benchmark.

We also increased CPU workload along two vectors: we decreased pause time between web page loads and we shifted to full desktop web pages, some of which are very js heavy. The end result is a CPU usage profile that mimics constant, heavy usage beyond just web browsing. Everything you do on your smartphone ends up causing CPU usage peaks - opening applications, navigating around the OS and of course using apps themselves. Our 5th generation web browsing battery life test should map well to more types of smartphone usage, not just idle content consumption of data from web pages.

As always we test across multiple air interfaces (3G, 4G LTE, WiFi), but due to the increased network load we actually find that on a given process technology we see an increase in battery life on faster network connections. The why is quite simple to understand: the faster a page is able to fully render, the quicker all components can drive down to their idle power states.

All Android tests use Chrome and 5GHz WiFi unless otherwise listed.

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: Web Browsing Battery Life (3G/4G LTE)

The Nexus 4 doesn't break any records for 3G battery life, it ends up relatively low on our list - even the Galaxy S 3 manages to do better here on 3G.

AT Smartphone Bench 2013: Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

WiFi battery life is similar to the Galaxy S 3, but again it's not all that impressive compared to some of the other devices in this list.

Our tablet web browsing battery life test isn't directly comparable to the new smartphone tests, so we've got a separate chart for the Nexus 10:

Web Browsing Battery Life

Despite driving a very high res panel, Google is able to deliver relatively competitive battery life with the Nexus 10. Battery capacity is around 80% the size of the 3rd gen iPad and battery life is around 93% of what Apple delivers here. Over 10 hours would be nice to have, but 8 hours of use in this test isn't bad at all. We'll have to do more testing to understand Exynos 5's power behavior a bit better, but so far it doesn't seem that the platform is all that bad from a power consumption standpoint. It remains to be seen how gracefully the Nexus 10 will handle being taxed heavier.

Display

We're still running our big display analysis routines on the new Nexus devices, but the brightness/contrast data below is a little teaser:

Brightness (White)

Brightness (Black)

Contrast Ratio

Final Words

We still have a lot of additional writing and testing ahead of us. Stay tuned for our full review of both devices!

Introduction & CPU Performance
POST A COMMENT

244 Comments

View All Comments

  • dave1_nyc - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    Did you miss the word 'preview' in the headline? Regardless, please abandon any site you consider useless, and that fails to amuse. Reply
  • Fx1 - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    All At mobile reviews pretty much suck. Compared to the SSD, CPU and GPU tests the mobile are amateur. Reply
  • akdj - Monday, November 05, 2012 - link

    And What is it you do during the weekdays? I'd love to see what you're doing review-wise. No one Is forcing you to come to AT To read mobile reviews. Anandtech Is Hand's down the best reviewer. Whether it comes to CPU GPU or mobile phone/Tablet hands on. Show me a single site that takes the time to compile reviews and scores and benchmarking in the same place. Not a 24 hour review of something held in hand and played with in the office for a day---Anand continuously refers to out of date benchmarking in the mobile arena-and is continuously updating and/or finding better measurement tools. Are you really that ignorant? He's using Almost every single benchmark for mobile devices on the market. Not his fault that android continues to fail the tests in comparison with Apple products. Perhaps fail is too strong of a word however android is obviously now just catching up to the last generation Apple devices...with today's available benchmarking tools available
    That's not his fault...and for the biggest groups of SIII owners, in America, they're NOT using the international version
    In fact, I'm blown away how poorly the 'US' SIII continues to underwhelm in All benchmarking
    I develop for both platforms. I am a fan of both Apple and android. I own a half-dozen devices from each side. Tablets--Xoom, N7 (w/N10 on the way), and a first gen Galaxy note...I've also got a GSIII. Each iteration of iPad, the 3GS, 4, 4s & 5. My hope? They Both continue to strive to better their operating systems and UI's....however, the biggest hurdle? Android's joke of an SDK in comparison with Apple's SDK and 'free XCode'---development for Apple's tablets are so much further ahead in comparison. I'm truly hoping google gets a bit more interested in helping the Dev community...again, especially on the tablet front. Two big powers help all of us--whether you're pure Android, ONLY iOS...or, you're a real geek like myself & you dig both!
    Reply
  • ciparis - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    Feel entitled much? Reply
  • Peanutsrevenge - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    "Google Nexus 4 and Nexus 10 Performance Preview"

    ah, you have a 'p' issue, I understand and hope the medication your doctor 'P'rescribed will help eventually
    Reply
  • etre - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    Here you go, international S3, stock JB, Apex launcher:

    Octane benchmark:
    1838 - Stock browser
    1573 - Chrome browser
    1876 - Boat browser

    Kraken benchmark:
    17550 - Stock browser
    19774 - Chrome browser
    17702 - Boat browser

    SunSpider benchmark:
    1141 - Stock browser
    1374 - Chrome browser
    1116 - Boat browser

    Stop testing in chrome, is just awful
    Reply
  • doobydoo - Sunday, November 04, 2012 - link

    Doesn't change its rank in the charts. Reply
  • amdwilliam1985 - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    I always read their mobile benchmarks with a grain of salt, especially when they mixes in iProducts. For "whatever" reason, it does not reflect my real life usage.(My gf always casts envy eyes on the battery life of my SGS# ;)
    Anyway, reviews are only reviews, therefore it should be only use as a reference.
    Reply
  • SirMaster - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    Envoius of SGS3 battery life? What terrible phone is she using? I had the SGS3 for 2 weeks myself and I actually decided to return it because of the poor battery life (among a few other reasons). I really wanted to like it, but it just wasn't great for me.

    I had both the SGS3 and iPhone 5 on my person for 2 weeks and tested them a lot. With the SGS3 I was only getting 4-5 hours of screen-on time where as I was getting 7-8 hours on the iPhone 5. The SGS3 would drain 20% overnight doing nothing (no background services, no notifications) The iPhone 5 drains 3% in the same timeframe even with all my notifications turned on, in the same location. Both have 1 bar of HSDPA in my apartment.

    I don't understand what kind of usage people are getting on their SGS3s who say they have great battery life. When I used both phones side by side it was clearly not very good.

    Maybe I got a lemon.
    Reply
  • etre - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    I have an S3 and I can assure you that it is lasting more then 5 hours screen time. Maybe 5 hours of playing flash videos over wifi.

    Usually people who are complaining about bad battery are leaving all the things turned on (wifi , 3g, gps , bt, nfc) and are not using power saving options.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now