If we'd never heard the name Sandy, we'd have featured two live blogs today, and had a few hours to spend with the latest members of the Nexus family. Sadly, Google's event was canceled and so we're left with press images and specifications. But that doesn't mean there isn't plenty to discuss, so let's get started. 

The Nexus 4

The Nexus program has always had three components: a platform, an OEM and new software. The platform is the SoC and other internal hardware components that define the performance characteristics Google would like to see all manufacturers pursue. The OEM partner works with Google in design and features, and, of course, manufacturing and packaging. At times the platform and OEM have fit hand in glove, with the platform and design hewn from an existing product. We saw this in the Nexus One, which mirrored the hardware HTC was offering in the Droid Incredible and several other models. We saw this again with the Nexus S, which was strikingly similar to Samsung's Galaxy S, within and without. The Galaxy Nexus was a strange departure, owing its internals to a platform preferred by Motorola, but with a design that foretold Samsung's next iteration of the Galaxy S family. And now, there's the Nexus 4, which could have easily been called the Optimus Nexus or the Nexus G, were it not for Google finding a nomenclature they liked. 

Looking at the LG Optimus G's spec sheet alongside that of the Nexus 4 could leave one a bit bemused at how little has really changed. The same SoC, RAM, display, connectivity and battery configuration are shared by both devices. The Nexus 4 adds wireless charging, and wireless display courtesy of the Miracast standard. The design is familiar, but distinct; taking the hard lines of the rather square Optimus and softening them to form the Nexus. But much of the distinction comes in two key areas: price and software.

Nexus 4 and LG Optimus G Comparison
Device Nexus 4 LG Optimus G
SoC 1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
RAM/NAND/Expansion 2 GB LPDDR2, 8/16 GB NAND, no microSD 2 GB LPDDR2, 16 GB NAND, 16 GB microSD
Display 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch
Network Pentaband 2G / 3G (Uncertain baseband) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Qualcomm MDM9615 UE Category 3 LTE)
Dimensions 133.9mm x 68.7mm x 9.1mm, 139 grams 131.9mm x 68.9mm x 8.45mm, 145 grams
Camera 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing 13.0 MP or 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing
Battery 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr) 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr)
OS Android 4.2 Android 4.0.x
Connectivity 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC, Miracast wireless display 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC

In lieu of a drastic overhaul of Jelly Bean, this point advance refines various features we've already seen. Photo Sphere expands the panorama function to generate a composite that includes frames in multiple axes, resulting in an image similar to those you find in Google's Street View. A new text input option comes with Gesture Typing, which mimics Swype's mechanism of having the user glide their finger between target letters. Miracast is enabled with the update, which serves as an answer to Apple's AirPlay, though the ubiquity of Apple TV trumps that of Miracast-enabled displays. Quick Actions for Notifications and Google Now have been expanded and the Google Search results are now graced by their Knowledge Graph. LG will certainly work to have Android 4.2 ready for their Optimus G, before too long, but the Nexus 4's present exclusivity, and promise of future updates gives it an edge. 

Then there's price. The Nexus One premiered with impressive specs for the time and was a shot across the bow by Google against the US carriers. By tying us to lengthy contracts, US carriers maintain all of the agency for device selection, pricing and software bloat. By offering a halo phone from their own store, and selling it unlocked, Google offered an alternative. There were a few problems, though, with the price chief among them. At $529 off-contract, the Nexus One was priced similarly to other off-contract devices, but was far in excess of what consumers typically spend on even high-end devices. So, the experiment was a bit of a failure, with most off-contract buyers being enthusiasts and technophiles. 

The LG Optimus G is available through AT&T off-contract for an oddly familiar $549, while the Nexus 4 sheds $250 from the price along with 8 GB of NAND and the microSD slot. We'll refrain from making a to-do about the storage limitations, and focus on the unprecedented value that this device offers. And this makes it the shot across the bow for which the Nexus One was intended. But there's a different cost: LTE.

The GSM/HSPA networks that dominate internationally, and are featured here with AT&T and T-Mobile, offer interoperability across certain limited bands. The result is that a pentaband device can operate on nearly any GSM/HSPA network in the world. LTE interoperability is a rat's nest that may never be solved. Many more bands can be utilized and for those carrier's with legacy CDMA networks there remains a certification process that must be undergone by new hardware and software. The result is that no one device would operate on the panoply of networks in the US alone, and couldn't operate on several of them at all without direct involvement by the carriers. So, in order to maintain independence from the carrier taint, Google omits LTE and foregoes CDMA2000 networks like Verizon or Sprint. 

Does lacking the most modern air interface make this a lame duck? That's for you to decide. This remains the highest bang for your buck we've seen in an off-contract phone. At least on paper. We'll see how things look for sure in the review. 

The Nexus 10

Samsung's involvement in the second Nexus tablet comes at an interesting time in the Android tablet market. The iPad's success persists like a runaway freight train; updated hardware and a new form factor seem almost superfluous to the knowledge that the iPad will sell millions of units before the holidays. Despite previously flagging sales and market enthusiasm, the Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire demonstrated that there's life in the Android tablet market. So, with portability and affordability seemingly of paramount concern to tablet buyers, what's the place of a high-end, 10" tablet? 

The Nexus 10 marries the highest resolution display found on any tablet, with the latest CPU and GPU from ARM's design works. The SoC is the long awaited Exynos 5 Dual, the first with ARM's Cortex-A15 cores, and Mali-T604 GPU. Anand's been chugging away at the review for the most recent Chromebook, the first device to feature the Exynos 5 Dual, and will dig deep into the performance of the hardware, so we'll save plenty for that. I will mention again, though, that one of the key features of the SoC is the enormous memory bandwidth. 

When Apple introduced the Retina display on the iPad (early 2012) we explored the importance of memory bandwidth to be able to generate all those pixels at a high frame rate. For Apple the solution in the A5X was to develop a configuration of four 32-bit channels connected to LP-DDR2 memory with a 400 MHz clock. The resulting bandwidth was an impressive 12.8 GB/s. The Exynos 5 Dual matches that figure, but does so with half the channels at twice the clocks while utilizing low-voltage DDR3 memory (2x32bit @800 MHz). 

Where the Nexus 10 matches the iPad for memory bandwidth, it exceeds it in resolution. There was a time not so long ago that resolutions of 2560x1600 (WQXGA) were the stuff of 27" and 30" monitors, intended for workstations and gaming enthusiasts. As of November 13th, though, you'll find it in a 10" tablet weighing in at under two-thirds of a kilogram. We're sticklers for waiting till we've dissected things before we sing their praises, but historically, Samsung's done good things with these PLS devices in their tablets. 

Android 4.2 is on board, with a few tweaks for the tablet set. A new multi-user option will allow multiple people to share a tablet with each user given their own configuration and data. It will be interesting to see the way this is implemented, how resources and storage are shared amongst users, how apps common to multiple users are handled. 

With so much performance and so many pixels on hand, the Nexus 10 is a clear grab for iPad sales. Whether it sees success similar to the Nexus 7 may depend in part on pricing. At $399 for the 16 GB model, and $499 for the 32 GB model, the Nexus 10 undercuts the iPad by $100 across the board. Does that price make the Nexus 10 a clear recommendation of the recently updated iPad? We'll have to wait and see. 

POST A COMMENT

102 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrSpadge - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Reading comprehension is a virtue. Reply
  • jonup - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Well, the thing is that the same people that were complaining about LTE and microSD on the iPad are the once making big deal about it on the Nexus devices. Except, the Apple fanboys joint them.
    We know why both sides stick with no sd expansion - Apple sells you more flash in $100 increments and Google wants to sell you cloud storage.
    I'm having big beef with people complaining about LTE. First, as explained in the article it is shit for people who travel. It is contrary to the openness of the Android microsystem; and second, I feel that the complains about HSPA+ speed comes from 13 year-old kids playing top trumps. I get 36mbps to my house and running OC quad-core desktop on 27" monitor I never feel like "gosh this internet is slow". So I don't see how 60% of the bandwidth on a 160+% smaller screen size with several fold slower computing power is a limiting factor. So all you people that swear by LTE, your stick is bigger than mine, I just use mine more often and no one complains. :)
    As far as screen resolution on these small devices, let's say I care about my eye. (wing at the guys with the big shticks)
    Reply
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Google does not care about selling cloud storage, They know SD cards suck on Android and want them to go away. Also since they sell these devices at cost they keep the memory sizes as minimal as possible. Pretty sad state of affairs all the way around but its google and their low quality software and hardware as usual. Reply
  • Conficio - Thursday, November 01, 2012 - link

    Also since they sell these devices at cost they keep the memory sizes as minimal as possible.

    What sense does that make? +8GB of Flash memory costs with USB controller (as a USB Stick) $10. I'm sure built in in large quantities the costs is even less.

    If selling at cost is the point it would be an easy route to offer devices with 32Gb or even 64GB of memory for small increments of price (+$40, +$100 respectively). And let the market decide what size device they want to pay for.

    For Google that should be an especially attractive (feasible) model, as it does not have to deal with the logistics of stocking the different sizes in thousands of stores.
    Reply
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    So now the Android kids think;
    No LTE is just fine.
    A glass back is just fine.
    No SD card is just fine
    8 GB of memory is just fine.

    What level of cognitive dissonance do these people require to come up with this. Oh and how does Google hit these magical price points? They make no money from these devices. Thats how desperate they are to get people to buy an Android tablet. No profit.
    But don't worry, it will be typical Samsung shoddy construction and typical zero support for Nexus devices from Google or anyone else.
    Reply
  • bplewis24 - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Talk about Cognitive Dissonance. You are completely disconnected from reality.

    You can buy an Android LTE phone on just about any carrier except T-Mobile. Google has NEVER made an unlocked GSM LTE phone, so this is no different.

    But you go on arguing against statements that nobody is making and against products that never existed.
    Reply
  • steven75 - Friday, November 02, 2012 - link

    Can you buy an Android phone with modern hardware, including LTE, that doesn't have grotesque skins or carrier bloatware?

    Because the Nexus used to be that device. Now, not so much!
    Reply
  • ImSpartacus - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    There's no such thing as bad products, only bad prices.

    Google picked a very good price.
    Reply
  • name99 - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    There is no such thing as good prices, only profitable prices.
    Apple has picked VERY profitable prices.

    You see how it goes when we're allowed to make arbitrary absolute statements...

    (You can argue that a customer should care only about the price they see, not about profitability for the company. True if you're only in it for the short term. But if you're planning to be part of a long-term ecosystem, profitability matters.
    Palm showed that earlier, RIM is showing that right now, and it's quite possible Nokia will be providing a followup lesson in a year or so.)
    Reply
  • Alucard291 - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    Why do you care so much about company profits? Surely we all can be certain that none of the giants are going to keel over and die next year right?

    That said google picked a much better price for us. Apple picks better price for its own profits. So which do you prefer? Well that's also depends.

    So yeah go back to your cave basically ;)
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now