Picking up from where we left off with Intel, earnings week has continued to roll along with most of the major tech companies having reported their Q3 earnings. As we noted in our look at Intel’s earnings, Intel is the traditional bellwether for the PC industry, and for Q3 that bellwether was reporting that the PC market had unquestionably grown weaker, and that Q4 was to be cast into even more doubt. As one of the strongest PC-centric tech companies Intel has significant exposure to any weakness in the PC market, but at the same time they’re also in the best position to weather whatever may come. For their partners and their competitors however, a weak market can be a significantly bigger drain.

This brings us to today’s major PC earnings announcement: AMD. AMD is by far the weaker CPU manufacturer, and while it has some level of diversification through its GPU division and embedded CPUs, like Intel they’re still significantly exposed to the PC market, setting the stage for a rough quarter. Furthermore rumors began circulating that AMD was looking at another round of layoffs – rumors that have seen been proven at least partially correct – which would indicate that AMD was struggling even more than anticipated. With these factors in mind there has been a great deal of anticipation for AMD’s Q3 earnings call, so let’s dive right in.

For Q3 of 2012 AMD reported $1.27B in revenue, with a net loss of $157M. Unfortunately for AMD (but not unexpected) this is a significant drop in both revenue and net income on both a quarterly and yearly basis, having furthermore pushed AMD back into the red after turning a slight profit in Q2. Compared to AMD’s Q3 2011 results, revenue is down approximately $420M, a nearly 25% drop; net income meanwhile swung from positive $97M to negative $157M, a shift of nearly $250M. Finally, AMD’s gross margin was an abysmal 31%, well below last year’s gross margin of 45%, which is generally where AMD needs to be to turn any kind of profit.

AMD Q3 2012 Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $1.27B $1.41B $1.69B
Net Income -$157M $37M $97M

The single biggest factor for this sudden change in fortunes is a $100M inventory write-down AMD had to take this quarter for unsold Llano inventory. In Q3 of 2011 Llano was the biggest factor in AMD turning a profit, but a year later those chips have been superseded by AMD’s new Trinity APU. Notably AMD is calling this a write-down and not a write-off, so it looks like they’re accounting for the loss of value of these APUs (i.e. they’ll have to sell them at lower prices than they planned for), as opposed to simply throwing out $100M in Llano APUs. Nevertheless, even if AMD had not taken the write-down they still would have lost around $50M for the quarter, so while Llano inventories were a big problem for AMD they are not the sole reason for AMD’s rough quarter.

Breaking down AMD’s numbers for the quarter, AMD’s Computing Solutions (CPU/APU) segment booked $927M in revenue, for an operating loss of $114M. This represents a 28% decline in revenue on a yearly basis, and like AMD’s overall profitability a flip from an operating income to an operating loss for the division. AMD looks to have been hit twice here; not only are overall sales lower, but their ASPs were also down.

AMD Q3 2012 Computing Solutions Division Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $927M $1.04B $1.28B
Operating Income -$114M $82M $149M

AMD doesn’t completely break down their CPU revenue by processor line, but they have stated a few facts. For client revenue (i.e. non-server) desktops were cited as being especially hard hit by lower sales volumes and ASPs. As for notebooks, AMD has stated that Trinity’s share of AMD notebook shipments has just surpassed 30%, which implies that the majority of AMD’s notebook APUs are still Brazos and Llano.

Meanwhile AMD’s Graphics division fared much better. For the quarter the Graphics division booked $342M in revenue, and once again turned a small but consistent operating income of $18M. This represents a 14% reduction in revenue over Q3 of 2011, while operating income has actually grown by $6M. AMD attributes the lower revenue to lower OEM sales, but noted that channel sales (i.e. retail) are higher than at this point last year. Interestingly despite the loss of revenue AMD’s GPU ASPs were also up compared to Q2, which is why they turned a greater operating income on lower revenues. Unfortunately as we’ve seen time and time again with AMD, while their Graphics division can consistently turn a small profit, at only 1/3rd the revenue of their Computing Solutions division it’s not nearly large enough to offset the losses AMD has run there.

AMD Q3 2012 Graphics Division Financial Results
  Q3'2012 Q2'2012 Q3'2011
Revenue $342M $367M $403M
Operating Income $18M $31M $12M

With all of that in mind, as bad as AMD’s Q3 was, much like Intel their projections are for Q4 to be even worse. Unlike Intel AMD doesn’t provide gross margin guidance, but for their revenue guidance they are predicting a further 9% (+/- 4%) decline in revenue.

This brings us to perhaps the most depressing news of the day: more layoffs. As part of their restructuring plan to return to profitability, AMD will be laying off nearly 15% of its workforce in Q4. They expect to take an $80M charge on this for severance payments, in return for $190M in projected savings in 2013. AMD is being intentionally vague about where these layoffs will come from, and it’s entirely possible they haven't completely figured that out at this time, so at this point it’s impossible to say if this will primarily hit one division (e.g. GPUs) or if it will be spread around all of AMD’s major divisions.

The layoffs are coming as part of a greater restructuring for the company, which will see them accelerating their previously announced shift away from the PC market in favor of mobile, servers, and semi-custom embedded chips. As the PC market continues to weaken – and AMD expects it to remain weak for several more quarters – they will be speeding up this transition in order to derive more of their revenue from non-PC sources sooner. Ultimately AMD wants to be in a position where 40-50% of their revenue comes from these fast-growing markets, with a specific goal of 20% of their revenue coming from semi-custom embedded APUs by Q4 of 2013.

To get there AMD will be simplifying their development cycles and increasing their focus on building reusable IP blocks, in essence transitioning to building their APUs in a more SoC-like fashion. AMD has been very careful to reiterate that they’re still an engineering company, and that graphics in particular are a cornerstone of the company. But much like the vague nature of the layoffs they are not making it clear what projects and products are being deprioritized or discontinued in order to achieve this simplification. What is clear is right now is that AMD will be reusing more IP and designs when they can to avoid having to undertake costly research and development.

Finally, AMD has also spent a bit of time talking about 2013 and beyond. On a financial side of things AMD’s goal is to get their operating costs to the point where a quarterly revenue of 1.3B would be their break-even point, which is part of AMD’s attempt to “reset” the company to survive on what would ultimately be lower margins. Meanwhile on the product side of things, silicon for Kabini (their 28nm Brazos replacement) is already back and AMD is working on a H1 2013 launch for that. As it stands nearly 85% of AMD’s current business is focused on the “legacy” PC market, so AMD is looking to shift into high margin, fast growing markets like tablets as soon as possible, which is where products like Kabini will take them.

POST A COMMENT

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • JumpingJack - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    @Beenthere... you said "PC sales are down to 2001 levels so with Intel sales also down and Intel idling numerous Fabs, i.e. laying off thousands, it's no surprise at all to me that AMD is cutting their work force by thousands also."

    You have been going all around the net saying this a lot and it just isn't true. PC sales are not down to 2001 levels. You are confusing a headline that read something to the affect "PC sales will drop for the first time since 2001" and have twisted into sales have dropped to 2001 levels.

    http://www.bgr.com/2012/10/10/worldwide-pc-shipmen...

    Gartner estimates that shipments will drop from 2011 of 352.8 million units to 348.7 million in 2012. This is the first time since 2001 that the year over year number of PC units shipped has dropped.

    Sales in 2001, were on the order of 120 million or so. One magazine tracked all of Gartners numbers to poke fun of Steve Balmers ridiculous predictions. This data is actualized through 2010:
    http://www.theopensourcery.com/keepopen/2012/ballm...

    In fact, Intel's quarterly revenue in the 2001 era was around 7 to 8 billion per quarter (Intel had never broke the 10 billion quarter mark until just a few years ago).
    If PC sales were, in fact, at 2001 level revenues would have been hit much much harder especially considering ASPs are much lower today than in 2001.

    Next you say Intel is laying off thousands, though I have not seen that headline. You seem to imply that Intel is idling fabs where Anand said they were idling capacity, this sound more like Intel is simply not loading the fabs as high to avoid ballooning inventories. This doesn't mean Intel won't lay off as well, but something like that would certainly be news worthy and get headlines and that just hasn't occurred.

    You really should stop exaggerating and spreading false information.

    Reply
  • cosminmcm - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    He always defends AMD and keeps saying the same stupid things on every site.
    Like for example SSDs are unreliable and he quotes Anand for that (taken out of context, of course).
    Reply
  • toyotabedzrock - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    He is not a fanboy, he is a hired political troll. Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    No he's another commenter just like everyone else.
    I read his link and the whole deal stinks, so glad I saw it, however this is not for near straight politics and his link is only slightly related when stretching it quite a bit.
    I don't mind at all if it's directly related or very pertinent.

    At this point it just pisses me off that amd cannot handle it. Pete sakes pull one out of your magic rabbit hat already !

    We've got all these rubes babbling that amd just cannot compete directly with Intel and THAT'S A PILE OF CRAP !

    They've done it TWICE in the very recent past.
    I'll tell you who I can't stand more than political off topic hack postings... the blind monkey boy babbling fools and doofs who repeat some frikkin mantric tantrum toodle talking point some other totally clueless set of morons spewed at them, and pretend and present it as if they are saying something they know and believe, when pathetically it is entirely incorrect, period.

    God I can't stand that.
    Reply
  • Wolfpup - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    Good grief...I'm sorry, but PCs had been around just a LITTLE bit in 2001, so the fact that we're selling multiple times that NOW seems like the market is...actually awesome. I suppose the difference though is CPUs cost way less than they used to, and we didn't used to have semi-decent <$1000 notebooks and whatnot.

    At any rate, I really hate that AMD's having issues, although like the guy said, Intel is too, I'm just more worried about AMD, since obviously we need them too!

    And regarding llano, it's not like those are bad chips now or anything.
    Reply
  • toyotabedzrock - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    Take your politics to another site troll. Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    I believe his point was no one can count on any help from the gov for saving any amd jobs, and in fact implied the gov may be pushing the jobs off US soil in the back round.

    Yes it was a vague relation, but I got the point that the bailout theory for AMD is just not going to happen.
    I suppose the other chance would be the gov moving on some lawsuit monopoly or something like that issue, but it appears that has already been settled...

    Maybe using the brain a bit before the rage attack is a good idea. :)
    Reply
  • Brainling - Friday, October 19, 2012 - link

    No, he was political trolling. There was ZERO reason to bring up the president or the election in his OP, none what so ever.

    It was political trolling, and this guy basically just copy and pastes these opinions on all the sites. There is ample evidence he's a paid troll or corporate shill.
    Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, October 20, 2012 - link

    Works for the braindead, "brainling". Reply
  • medi01 - Sunday, October 28, 2012 - link

    Take your idiotic fanboi comments to another site please.

    Or better ask your doctors to disconnect your clinic from the internet, your illness seems to be worsening.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now