Overclocking: Gaming Performance

Because all of our GTX 650 Ti cards hit the same clockspeeds when overclocking, there’s absolutely nothing to meaningfully separate them from one-another when it comes to gaming performance. The real difference was in their power consumption, temperatures, and fan noise.

With that in mind, the performance improvement is nothing short of astonishing. Between the 27% core overclock and the 22% memory overclock we’re looking at performance gains in the range of 20-25%. This isn’t enough to catch the GTX 660, but it’s enough to improve performance in a number of situations, including making 1920x1200 playable more often. It goes without saying that this is also enough to catch up to the stock 7850 in those scenarios where the 7850 isn’t leading by more than 25%.

OC: Power, Temperature, & Noise Final Words
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • chizow - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    I guess in years past this may and probably should've been branded GTS 650Ti along with the GTS 650 (they've used GTS 250, GTS 450 etc in the past), but I know for a fact Nvidia is trying to establish GTX as its own brand for gamers.

    They really emphasize it with all this "Green Light" business with regard to overclocking, overvolting etc.
  • Blazorthon - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    Nvidia has been cracking down on overvolting support, so IDK if I'd give them that much credit.
  • Pneumothorax - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    That will make the price/performance gap even worse as the 7850 is an oc beast.
  • goinginstyle - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    So why no reviews of the Asus or MSI offerings in these roundups?
  • silverblue - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    You need to be sent a card in order to review it. ;)
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    The 7850 1GB is $150. It IS is the direct competitor to the 650 ti. You can speculate all you want about the 1GB being some sort of ephemeral limiting factor, but I dont see it. All I see is that in one game, at BEYOND 1080p resolution, memory becomes a factor. But if you look at it, you can see that it is still so very close on the bell curve. I bet that if you actually tested Skyrim at 1920x1080 (not 1920x1200), there would be much less difference between 2GB and 1GB.

    Even 2 years from now the 7850 1GB is going to be a better performer than the 650ti. Even with the "latest and greatest" games.
  • Shark321 - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    Where is the 7850 1GB $150?
  • KineticHummus - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    yeah wish i could fine one of those haha. pretty sure there isnt a single card for 150
  • Marlin1975 - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    How about $159 AR shipped?

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
  • LordanSS - Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - link

    I'm a bit curious about this card's performance with PhysX enabled games.

    Personally, I am a 6970 owner and thus have no access to PhysX effects on games, but there are many workarounds out there where you can add a nVidia card to your machine to compute the physics.

    Borderlands 2 is an example, I know of people buying (cheap) nVidia cards so they can run physics on them. Problem is that, most of the time, these guys are buying really old or cheap hardware (like GT210 or 430 cards), causing a big drop in game performance. Others using more powerful (and expensive) cards, on the other hand, experience good results.

    So I'm thinking what's the cutting point for performance here. I know it's an extremely niche endeavor, but if anyone has experience or thoughts, I'd be glad to hear them.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now