• What
    is this?

    You've landed on the AMD Portal on AnandTech. This section is sponsored by AMD. It features a collection of all of our independent AMD content, as well as Tweets & News from AMD directly. AMD will also be running a couple of huge giveaways here so check back for those.

    PRESENTED BY

After originally missing its initial launch window of late June, and again missing a soft launch target of 2 weeks ago, the first Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition card has finally turned up in our weekly scouring of Newegg. And boy is it a doozy.

As we mentioned in our previous update, AMD’s partners have decided to take a slightly different direction with the 7970GE than AMD originally intended. Instead of shipping straightforward reference and semi-custom 7970GE cards, partners have chosen to integrate the binned Tahiti GPU into their existing high-end product lineups. As a result the 7970GE is effectively a month behind schedule, but this also means the first cards are more powerful than the “mere” reference 7970GE we saw back in June.

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Specification Comparison
  Sapphire Toxic 7970GE 6GB "Lethal" Sapphire Toxic 7970GE 6GB "Stock" AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition AMD Radeon HD 7970
Stream Processors 2048 2048 2048 2048
Texture Units 128 128 128 128
ROPs 32 32 32 32
Core Clock 1150MHz 1050MHz 1000MHz 925MHz
Boost Clock 1200MHz 1100MHz 1050MHz N/A
Memory Clock 6.4GHz GDDR5 6GHz GDDR5 6GHz GDDR5 5.5GHz GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 384-bit 384-bit 384-bit 384-bit
VRAM 6GB 6GB 3GB 3GB
FP64 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4
Transistor Count 4.31B 4.31B 4.31B 4.31B
PowerTune Limit ? 250W+ 250W+ 250W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture GCN GCN GCN GCN
Launch Date 07/30/2012 07/30/2012 06/22/2012 01/09/2012
Launch Price $699 $699 $499 $549

The first 7970GE card to ship is a prime example of this strategy: Sapphire’s Toxic HD 7970 GHz Edition 6GB. As many of our long-time readers are aware, Sapphire uses their Toxic sub-brand to house their customized high-end factory overclocked parts, and the 7970GE Toxic is no exception. On top of the custom PCB and custom cooler one would expect to find in a fully-custom card, Sapphire is shipping the card with a base clockspeed of 1050MHz, a further 50MHz beyond the 7970GE’s reference base clock. The boost clock is in turn also raised by 50MHz, giving the card a 1.1GHz boost clock at stock.

However it appears that Sapphire hasn’t stopped there, as 1050MHz is only one of two configurations the 7970GE Toxic supports. The 7970GE Toxic ships with a second, higher clocked performance BIOS which is enabled by the “Lethal Boost Button” on the card, which switches the card over to this second BIOS.  The second BIOS in turn is truly an overclocked BIOS, with Sapphire bumping up the core clock by a further 100Mhz and the memory clock a further 400MHz, to a final clockspeed of 1150MHz base clock, 1200MHz boost clock, and 6.4GHz memory clock. Compared to the reference 7970 that was launched back in January this is a significantly higher clocked card (nearly 25%), which makes for an abnormal mid-cycle performance improvement for the still-young 7970.

Now for the bad news: the first 7970GE is going to set you back $699. Custom cards always carry a premium and the Toxic lives up to that expectation just as well as it does any other. Between the factory overclock, greater amount of RAM, and other custom functionality, Sapphire is charging a $200 premium over what a reference 7970GE would go for. Every indication so far is that the rest of AMD’s partners will be going in the same direction by using the 7970GE for custom cards, so at this point it’s we’re unsure if we’ll see anything with the performance or the price of the reference 7970GE. We’re not sure that’s a good thing here – one of the great things about the 7970GE was that it established an official SKU for AMD’s direct GTX 680 competitor – but for now it is what it is.

Source: Newegg

POST A COMMENT

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • rbfowler9lfc - Wednesday, August 01, 2012 - link

    Why, why not 6 mDP? So much power, so few outputs Reply
  • Wreckage - Wednesday, August 01, 2012 - link

    $700!? LOL! They should just send you a garbage can to throw you money into. Reply
  • RussianSensation - Wednesday, August 01, 2012 - link

    Yes, it's definitely overpriced but compared to the main competition, GTX680 Lightning and EVGA GTX680 Classified, it eats them for breakfast once overclocked to 1250-1280mhz. The Classified in particular is a joke since you need to spend $70-80 for the EVBot just to unlock its voltage. The fan on the Classified is also nowhere near as good as this card. Reply
  • jabber - Thursday, August 02, 2012 - link

    Plenty of folks with little in the way of a life and that live to run benchmarks all day will be queuing up to by these.

    They should call them the "Single Guy Living in Parents Basement Edition"
    Reply
  • Targon - Monday, August 06, 2012 - link

    The people who buy these don't run benchmarks all day, though they will run them on day 1 to verify that they are getting the performance they SHOULD get for their purchase. After that, I can see these cards as a good choice for a 3 or even a 6 monitor Eyefinity setup. If you want to run that sort of a setup, you need this sort of performance. Reply
  • Frallan - Thursday, August 09, 2012 - link

    However now that they have managed to get these chips out the door where are the 7970 M and 7950 M - they are missing in action and nVidia 660 rules the major brands top of the lines with some 680:s to spice it up from special providors.

    Is AMD/ATI missing out on the entire enthusiast mobile market?
    Reply
  • Gastec - Tuesday, November 13, 2012 - link

    Why do you let this troll ( the CeriseCogburn) ruin the comments section? Why don't you ban him? Reply
  • mr echo - Tuesday, March 12, 2013 - link

    im having a core 2 duo 2.93GHz 3 gig ram and im gegting a bravia so i was planning to buy this 7970 so i jst wanted to know that will my desktop b able go run all demanding games at 1080 x 1920 res every thing maxed at frame rates above 40

    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now