I received a tip yesterday with proof that OCZ's Everest controller was actually a Marvell 88SS9174 controller (the same controller used in Crucial's m4Intel's SSD 510, etc...) with a custom Indilinx firmware. After a bit of digging, it turns out that this is indeed the case (OCZ confirmed it to me earlier today). Although OCZ is working on non-Marvell based solutions, the Everest 1 (Octane) and indeed the Everest 2 (Vertex 4) are both based on Marvell hardware. The firmware is entirely Indilinx's own development, but the hardware is from Marvell. The hardware implementation isn't completely identical as OCZ claims its solutions run at higher clock speeds than the standard off-the-shelf Marvell components. 

This doesn't really change anything but it does explain how OCZ was able to bring two revisions of Everest to market as quickly as it did after the Indilinx acquisition. OCZ and Marvell have been working very closely together for a while now and even announced a native PCIe controller they collaborated on at CES this year called Kilimanjaro. As even Intel has admitted to in the past, the value in delivering an SSD isn't always in controller hardware but rather the firmware and validation.

Update: Just to clarify, my information says the Everest 1 (Octane, Petrol) is a higher clocked Marvell 88SS9174. The Everest 2 (Vertex 4) could very well be the new Marvell 88SS9187 given its significant performance enhancements. If it is the 9187 that could tell us a lot about just how close OCZ and Marvell are, as the Vertex 4 started shipping less than a month after Marvell announced the new controller.

POST A COMMENT

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • aaloto - Wednesday, April 18, 2012 - link

    I think that is the only sensible approach to take, I have the vertex 3 120GB maxiops on my PC rig, but looking to get an SSD with a higher capacity and better WRITE performance for my Mac, I have no loyalty to any particular brand, performance and price rules the waves for me. But we dont know if OCZ sees the relative poor READ performance of the vertex 4 as something they want to fix. One would hope so! I hope they do and sometime soon too.

    I Wonder if Anand has any info on that.
    Reply
  • Zarathustra[h] - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    The reviews on Anandtech were with the release firmware of the Vertex 4.

    There are two more recent revisions of the firmware out, and it seems to have addressed the queue depth issue with the Vertex 4, bringing read speeds up to par with write speeds...

    I'm hoping Anandtech will consider revisiting their Vertex 4 review with the new firmware.
    Reply
  • Zarathustra[h] - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Is it just me, or does that chip look like its been sanded down, and then restamped with the indilinx logo? :p Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now