Battlefield 3

Its popularity aside, Battlefield 3 may be the most interesting game in our benchmark suite for a single reason: it’s the first AAA DX10+ game. It’s been 5 years since the launch of the first DX10 GPUs, and 3 whole process node shrinks later we’re finally to the point where games are using DX10’s functionality as a baseline rather than an addition. Not surprisingly BF3 is one of the best looking games in our suite, but as with past Battlefield games that beauty comes with a high performance cost

Battlefield 3 - 2560x1600 - Ultra Quality + FXAA-High

Battlefield 3 - 1920x1200 - Ultra Quality + 4xMSAA

Battlefield 3 - 1920x1200 - Ultra Quality + FXAA-High

Battlefield 3 - 1680x1050 - High Quality + FXAA-High

NVIDIA’s cards have always done well at Battlefield 3, which puts the Radeon HD 7900 series in a bad position from the beginning. Short of the GTX 680’s massive lead in the Portal 2 bonus round, this is the single biggest victory for the GTX 680 over the 7970, beating AMD’s best by 28% at 2560, and by continually higher amounts at lower resolutions. Based on our experience with BF3 I’d hesitate to call the 680 fully fluid at 2560 as large firefights can significantly tear into performance relative to Thunder Run, but if it’s not fully fluid then it’s going to be very, very close.

What’s also interesting here is that once again the GTX 680 is doing very well compared to the dual-GPU cards. The GTX 590 and 6990 never pull away from the GTX 680, and at 1920 with FXAA the GTX 680 finally squeaks by and takes the top of the chart. Performance relative to the GTX 580 is also once again good for that matter, with the GTX 680 beating its predecessor by 48% at almost every resolution.

Portal 2 Starcraft II
POST A COMMENT

405 Comments

View All Comments

  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    While I love BF3, it's not the only game that matters, but it is the only example of the 680 beating the 7970 at frame rates that matter. However the 7970 is catching up as the res goes up. If we add 2 monitors does the 680 still win ?

    BTW Crysis and Metro 2033 FPS matters to me. Do you think the GPU world revolves around you and what you want? You are not the center of the Videocard world.
    Reply
  • Eugene86 - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    No, the GPU world doesn't revolve around me but as I already said, nobody but you and a handful of other people actually care about the Crysis and Metro benchmarks because almost nobody plays those games anymore.
    In my example, Battlefield 3 is a current game that is actually played by people so those benchmarks are useful.
    The only reason why Crysis and Metro are used are because they are benchmark games that stress the video cards to their limits. This is nice for bragging rights but completely useless in the real world.
    Nvidia and AMD both release video cards that are aimed to please their main market, which is gamers who play on a single monitor at 1080p.
    Reply
  • SlyNine - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    So what are you baseing this on? can you give me any sources?

    I'm not buying a 600$ video card for just one game.

    Plus like I said, as the settings go up, they seem to converge. I can't help but wonder if the 7970 would overtake the 680 at some point before we hit 30fps.
    Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link

    Then look at SHOGUN 2 total war in this very article man.
    Wow, s many of you are so controlled and so mindless on things...
    " Total War: Shogun 2 is the latest installment of the long-running Total War series of turn based strategy games, and alongside Civilization V is notable for just how many units it can put on a screen at once. As it also turns out, it’s the single most punishing game in our benchmark suite "
    680 takes the top in that game man.
    Reply
  • Galidou - Sunday, March 25, 2012 - link

    ''Nvidia and AMD both release video cards that are aimed to please their main market, which is gamers who play on a single monitor at 1080p''

    Well then it means that gamers can be more than pleased with a radeon 6870 at 140$ that runs everything with 95% graphical options enabled or a gtx 560ti(not the 448 cores version) for around 200$ which performs a little better than the 6870 and still does the trick in everygame at 1080p.

    Prices taken from the bay as no regular 560ti was available on newegg for price comparison.

    Oh... and for the 5% graphical options you can't turn on, you'll only notice when you go on a sunday walk in your games, but doing so will have you dead in a second if you play online against other players...
    Reply
  • b3nzint - Monday, March 26, 2012 - link

    i play metro, cysis a lot, amazing graphic! but thats not "real world" to me. maybe if i play bf3 im in real world? Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link

    Shogun 2 total war, the most demanding game in the benches- did you read ?
    Nvidia GTX680 sweeps the entire resolution set beating the slower 7970 that cannot handle modern demanding games as well,.
    Reply
  • akse - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Seems impossible to do such a feat!!! Considering they launched it months later than the competitor! Reply
  • arjuna1 - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Correct??

    You call +10 fps difference at best, on certain situations, a domination??

    The only good thing this will bring is prices down, the rest is truly unremarkable, for both companies.

    See you in the 8xxx/7xxx series.
    Reply
  • Wreckage - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Maybe I was a bit hasty. I did forget to mention that it hard launched with working drivers and working h.264 encoding, also quiet under load. Impressive++ Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now