Metro 2033

The heaviest test we'll show in this suite, Metro 2033 still requires a discrete GPU for reasonable performance. That being said, it's still an interesting measure of how much more GPU horsepower exists in Ivy Bridge:

Metro 2033

Metro 2033

Metro 2033

Here the Llano gap shrinks to about 13 - 25% depending on the resolution/quality settings. AMD still has the clear advantage in GPU performance, but Intel does step closer. The performance advantage over Sandy Bridge ranges from 20 - 40%. With these sorts of numbers it's clear why Intel views Ivy Bridge as being a tick+. Generational performance improvements on the CPU side generally fall in the 20 - 40% range. As you've just seen, Ivy Bridge offers a 7 - 15% increase in CPU performance over Sandy Bridge - making it a bonafide tick from a CPU perspective. The 20 - 40% increase on the graphics side is what blurs the line between a conventional tick and what we have with Ivy Bridge.

Intel HD 4000 Performance: Crysis Warhead Intel HD 4000 Performance: DiRT 3
POST A COMMENT

195 Comments

View All Comments

  • jjj - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    CPU perf pretty much as expected,GPU perf somewhat dissapointing ,i thought they'll at least aim to match Llano but i guess it is ok for 1MP laptops screens if mobile parts perform close enough (and a couple of big ifs when it comes to image quality and drivers).
    Any opinions yet about QuickSync encoding quality?
    Reply
  • wifiwolf - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    And we should remark that's comparing 2600 with 3700 which have different cpu too.
    Other benchmarks had significantly better results on 3700 than 2600.

    So Anand, how you know that difference is not attributable to the CPU and not to some gpu improvement?
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000 - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    You are not being serious, are you? The CPU gets 10% in CPU sensitive benchmarks and GPU gained 40-60%. Even taking out 10%, its still 30-50%, which btw isn't true as games aren't very sensitive to CPU changes as applications do. Reply
  • wifiwolf - Wednesday, March 07, 2012 - link

    Look at crisys or metro benchmarks and tell me where you find that improvement, at least more than what you find in cpu difference. Reply
  • mosu - Wednesday, March 07, 2012 - link

    I've tried it on some HD clips at a local TV station and on a big screen it really sucked.It's way behind AMD.We used aHP EliteBook 8460P laptop. Reply
  • Articuno - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    At least AMD's products are HD capable. Reply
  • dr/owned - Thursday, March 08, 2012 - link

    My 5 year old laptop with a shared ram gpu is "HD capable". GTFO noob. Reply
  • Articuno - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    Billions in R&D, double the MSRP, half the power and yet it still can't play Crysis better than Llano, which will be replaced by Trinity in a few weeks. What a crying shame. Reply
  • travbrad - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    Not playing Crysis sounds like a good thing to me. Reply
  • tipoo - Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - link

    Source or gtfo. Apple got the stock HD 3000, why would this be different? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now