Meet The EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2Win

As one would expect for a dual GPU card, the GTX 560 Ti 2Win is quite large. At 11.5” long we’ve seen larger cards, but not many. This is actually .5” longer than the dual-GF110 GTX 590, with EVGA eschewing a compact design for cooling. Similarly, while the card is technically only 2 slots wide the fans and shroud sit well above the card, and as a result the card is closer to 2.5 slots wide, making it a de facto triple-wide card.

Tearing apart the card we find the two GF114 GPUs sitting on top of EVGA’s custom PCB. Interestingly EVGA has rotated them 90 degrees each, which is a notable decision since the complete GF114 package is quite rectangular. 16 Hynix 1Gb GDDR5 modules are located on the PCB, 4 surrounding each GPU on both the front and back sides. These modules are rated for 5GHz, well over both the stock speed (4GHz) of the 2Win and what the hardware itself would be capable of. Meanwhile PCIe bridging for each GPU is provided by the ubiquitous NVIDIA NF200 bridge chip. NF200 is capable of providing each GPU with a full PCIe x16 connection, although the card as a whole is still limited to a single x16 link for communicating with the rest of the system.

Direct cooling for the GPUs and for the NF200 bridge chip is provided by a pair of individual aluminum heatsinks, with each one featuring a pair of heatpipes running out to the far edge of the heatsink. I’m not sure whether it’s intentional or not, but these heatsinks are very similar in design to the reference GTX 560 Ti heatsink, which is a good sign given the 560 Ti’s impressive cooling attributes.

Sitting above the heatsinks and mounted into the shroud are the 2Win’s 3 75mm fans, which results in an “all fan” design that has fans running virtually the entire length of the card. These fans are independently controlled, with 2 fans attached to one GPU and the last fan attached to the other GPU, allowing the 2Win to adjust its fan speeds based on the needs of the active GPU(s). In practice this means that when only 1 GPU is in use (e.g. a game that doesn’t support SLI), the 2Win doesn’t need to rev up unnecessary fans. The design of the fans and the shroud means that this is a completely open design with only a small amount of warm air being ejected outside through the PCIe bracket. So buyers will need a particularly airy case to handle the heat the 2Win will be dumping into the surrounding environment.

Looking towards the rear of the card we see that power is provided by 2 8pin PCIe power sockets. This means the 2Win can safely draw up to 375W of power, although without overvolting we’d estimate that the card draws no more than 330W. EVGA’s official specs call for a 700W power supply, which is the same as the GTX 590.

As for display connectivity, thanks to having 2 GPUs on board EVGA is able to drive up to 4 displays rather than the usual 2 for an NVIDIA card. EVGA has broken this up into 3 DL-DVI ports and a mini-HDMI port. This should efficiently cover triple monitor setups, but if you want a 4th monitor it will be limited to 1920 @ 60Hz. Meanwhile the SLI connector next to the PCI bracket is a bit of a red herring – 4-way SLI is not supported for the 2Win; given the hardware this is presumably an NVIDIA limitation as they have only ever supported 3 and 4-way SLI on their high-end GPUs.

Furthermore there’s a catch as to what motherboards the 2Win will work with. As the 2Win presents itself as a pair of GTX 560 Tis, in keeping with NVIDIA’s SLI licensing requirements NVIDIA’s drivers will only enable SLI if it’s plugged into an SLI certified motherboard. So on non-SLI motherboards the 2Win would only function as a single GTX 560 Ti in spite of the presence of both GPUs on the same card. This shouldn’t be a big issue given that most enthusiast boards are SLI certified, but it’s something that needs to be checked before purchasing the card.

Update 11/07: While there were some issues with this on the GTX 460 2WIn, this has apparently been resolved (the presence of NF200 shouldsatisfy all SLI license requirements in the first place). EVGA has said that the 2Win will work on non-SLI mobos, making it fully compatible with every motherboard.

Rounding out the hardware side of the package, EVGA has included the usual assortments of dongles and converters. 2 2x6pin to 1x8pin PCIe power adaptors are included for any buyers that don’t have a PSU with 8pin PCIe power plugs. Meanwhile a mini-HDMI to HDMI adaptor is provided to better utilize the HDMI port on the card, and a single DVI-to-VGA dongle is also provided.

As for the software side of the package, EVGA includes their customary overclocking & monitoring tools: EVGA Precision, and the EVGA OC Scanner. These tools haven’t significantly changed since the last time we’ve seen them, but then they don’t need to. Precision is still one of the best monitoring and overclocking utilities available thanks to its RivaTuner heritage, meanwhile the OC Scanner is a nice addition to EVGA’s tools to make it easier to test whether an overclock is suitable by looking for rendering artifacts. In practice I’m not sure how much use these tools will get with the 2Win – GF114 has a lot of headroom, but dual-GPU cards are known to be fickle about overclocking.

Finally, for warranty service our retail sample is a KR part, indicating that it comes with a 3 year warranty. Typically EVGA offers multiple warranties, and on a historical basis the GTX 460 2Win was available with both a 3 year and lifetime warranty.

Index The Test, Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • DarkUltra - Sunday, November 6, 2011 - link

    - "On the other hand if you don’t share EVGA’s confidence in SLI, then very little has changed. If you believe that new games will have teething issues with SLI, that microstutter will continue to exist, and that not every game will scale well with SLI, then the 2Win is a poor choice in light of the more consistent performance of the GTX 580"

    What? Why not check frametimes in the games you benchmarks? It is easy, just enable the option in FRAPS and import the data in a spreadsheet. If high framerate comes in lumps, there is no perceived improvement.

    A focus on this will make SLI and Crossfire even better, please do that in your next review :)

    For now readers can check
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/21516
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, November 6, 2011 - link

    At this point it's not really a concern about our existing games. All of them are well developed on the driver side. The concern is with the future: will Batman microstutter? Will Serious Sam have SLI support with good scaling the day it launches? These are questions that can't be answered in the present, which is why it's largely a question of faith in NVIDIA's capabilities.
  • s44 - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    Is it possible to include a subjective microstutter report with these reviews?
  • dj christian - Thursday, November 10, 2011 - link

    Even though i am a long timereader of Anand since ten years back I really had to register to make this post..

    Actually Ryan i think you missed his point. Look at HardOCP:

    http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/11/08/asus_rog...

    With diagrams you see exactly what drops and framespikes given over a period of time. It's so much clearer than showing simple staples which actually says nothing, especially at the highest resolutions which can be a bit tricky to get a grip on.

    For the next review of a graphic card i really hope you post diagrams along with the simple benchmarks which gives the reader a much bigger overview of such things.
  • romany8806 - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    I know the first couple of pages of the article mention the redundancy of the SLI nub and the fact that this card needs an SLI-certified mobo, but I think these points should really rate a mention in the conclusion. Vram issues aside, for me these two failings almost completely invalidate this card as a useful option.

    I thought the point of dual-GPU cards was to allow:
    1. quad-SLI/quad-Xfire OR
    2. dual-GPU performance on less accommodating/feature-rich motherboards.

    The only viable application I can think of for this card (and I'm clutching at straws here) is on SLI-certified mATX boards in small enclosures where it is undesirable to use both slots for airflow reasons. Not sure I'd pay a 30% premium over 2 560 Ti boards for that.

    Good article, but readers who skim to the final page might be missing out on pertinent information.
  • Black1969ta - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    It requires an SLI Mobo, but can't be SLI'ed to another 560Ti 2WIN
    It pulls more power than 560Ti's in SLI.

    Excuses or not this review is pretty worthless without another 560Ti SLI boards to a dual GPU 560Ti Board.

    With the SLI Mobo certification requirement, and the lack of ability to add another 2WIN to get Quad GPU's with only two PCIe slots.

    And then Add in the $50+ Premium over 2 cards I fail to see the logic of this pricing and/or design.
    Without test results I fail to believe that I couldn't take two 560Ti Cards and SLI them with a modest OC and not get the same or better results.
  • Black1969ta - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    Ok I stand corrected, on the Game graphs I see the 560Ti SLI tested, but the 2WIN isn't $50 better which I suspected.

    FAIL EVGA!!!!!
  • Gonemad - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    I've always seen these dual-gpu cards as hit or miss, or more like an enthusiast part, really.

    If you just ignore the heat, the noise, the power consumption, then they become appealing, or even compete with 2 sli/cf cards.

    I still like powerful single-slot, single gpus cards better. No SLI issues, no CF issues, it just works, (or not). Should you ever need to upgrade, yay, you have a 2nd slot waiting, and hope you can still find your GPU for sale in compatible forms, then you go back in the SLI saddle.

    These cards compromise, one thing or another. Either you risk your PSU, or the builder has to tone down each gpu.

    I still would stick to a single 580, with the prospect in 1 year or 2, to buy a 2nd one, with a discount. I don't know, really.
  • s44 - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    Given that this is the most if not only significant PC-hardware-relevant release in years (pushes hardware while being critically popular *and* selling well), I hope you add it to the bench suite sooner rather than later.
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, November 7, 2011 - link

    The whole suite is getting redone for our SNB-E testbed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now