• What
    is this?
    You've landed on the AMD Portal on AnandTech. This section is sponsored by AMD. It features a collection of all of our independent AMD content, as well as Tweets & News from AMD directly. AMD will also be running a couple of huge giveaways here so check back for those.
    PRESENTED BY

How AMD’s Dynamic Switchable Graphics Works

One of the things we discussed with AMD was the technical details of their dynamic switchable graphics. At a high level, things might appear similar to NVIDIA’s Optimus, but dig a little deeper and you start to find differences. To recap how switchable graphics works, let’s start at the top.

The original switchable graphics technologies used the IGP and dedicated GPU as discrete devices. Both were connected to the necessary display outputs, with some hardware muxes that could select the active device. This requires more cost in the motherboard, and switching results in a blanking of the display as one device is deactivated and the other comes online. In the earliest implementations, you had to reboot when switching, and the system would start with either the IGP or dGPU active. Later implementations moved to software controlled muxes and dynamic switching, which required Windows Vista to work properly (since the IGP driver would unload, the GPU driver would start, and then the display content would activate on the GPU).

NVIDIA’s Optimus changes things quite a bit, as there are no longer any muxes. The display ports are always linked to the IGP output, and NVIDIA’s drivers simply look for calls to applications that the dedicated GPU can help accelerate. When they detect such an application—and the user can add their own custom apps—the drivers wake up the GPU and send it the rendering commands. The GPU does all of the necessary work, and then the result is copied directly into the IGP framebuffer, omitting any flickering or other undesirable effects as the IGP is constantly connected to the display output. The GPU can wake up in a fraction of a second, and when it’s no longer needed it will power down completely. NVIDIA even demonstrated this by removing the dGPU from a test system while it was powered on. The only catch is that the drivers need to have some knowledge of the applications/games in order to know when to use the GPU.

The details of AMD’s Dynamic Switchable Graphics are similar in practice to Optimus, but with a few differences. First, AMD always has both the IGP and GPU driver loaded, with a proxy driver funneling commands to the appropriate GPU. Where NVIDIA is able to completely power off the GPU under Optimus, AMD has modified their GPUs so that the PCI-E bus is isolated from the rest of the chip. Now when the GPU isn’t needed, everything powers down except for that PCI-E connection, so Windows doesn’t try to load/unload the GPU driver. The PCI-E link state gets retained, and a small amount (around 50mW) is needed to keep the PCI-E state active, but as far as Windows knows the GPU is still ready and waiting for input. AMD also informed us that their new GPUs use link adapter mode instead of multi adapter mode, and that this plays a role in their dynamic switchable graphics, but we didn’t receive any additional details on this subject.

As far as getting content from the dGPU to the display, the IGP always maintains a connection to the display ports, and it appears AMD’s drivers copy data over the PCI-E bus to the IGP framebuffer, similar to Optimus. Where things get interesting is that there are no muxes in AMD’s dynamic switchable graphics implementations, but there is still an option to fall back to manual switching. For this mode, AMD is able to use the display output ports of the Intel IGP, so their GPU doesn’t need separate output ports (e.g. with muxes). With the VAIO C, both dynamic and manual switching are supported, and you can set the mode as appropriate. Here are some static shots of the relevant AMD Catalyst Control Center screens.

In terms of the drivers, right now you get a single large driver package that includes a proxy driver, an Intel IGP driver, and AMD’s GPU driver all rolled into one. Long-term, AMD says they have plans to make their GPU driver fully independent from Intel’s IGP driver. They say this will only require some packaging updates and that they should make this change some time in 2012, but for now they continue to offer a monolithic driver package. OEMs apparently get this driver on a monthly basis (or can at least request it), but it’s up to the OEMs to validate the driver for their platform and release it to the public.

In the case of non-switchable graphics, AMD has a monthly driver update that we refer to as “reference drivers” that is publicly available. At present, you download a utility that will check your laptop GPU ID to see if the laptop is officially supported by the reference driver. Right now certain OEMs like to maintain control of the drivers so the AMD utility will refuse to download the full driver suite. In such cases, users have to wait for the manufacturers to roll out updates (Sony, Toshiba, and Panasonic all fall into this category). In the past, we have been able to download the reference driver using a “sanctioned” laptop (e.g. something from Acer), and we were able to install the reference driver on a non-sanctioned laptop. However, this does not work with switchable graphics laptops; you need the monolithic driver package for such systems.

That takes care of the high-level overview of how AMD’s Dynamic Switchable Graphics works, as well as a few other related items. The details are a little light, but that at least gives us an introduction to AMD’s current switchable graphics solutions. With the hardware and software discussions out of the way, let’s turn to our gaming results first and see how the two solutions and GPUs compare in performance as well as compatibility.

Switchable Graphics - Meet the Contenders Medium Detail Gaming Comparison
POST A COMMENT

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • just4U - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    It's been a looong day.. I need a good chuckle.. thanks! Reply
  • inplainview - Wednesday, September 21, 2011 - link

    Are you serial stupid? I said above that I do not play games. Are you reading challenged? Reply
  • ggathagan - Wednesday, September 21, 2011 - link

    Thanks,
    I was wondering what you ended up buying.
    What're you having for dinner tonight?
    Mom was worried, too. You might want to call her.
    Reply
  • sonofsanta - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    I, er, I think the phrase you're looking for is "cry foul", not "fowl". Wouldn't make much sense if people started running round shouting "Pheasant!" because nVidia sent you both laptops... Reply
  • MysteriousAndy - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    ++

    http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british...
    Reply
  • swx2 - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    relevant:
    http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=119
    Reply
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    It's simply a typo (or misspelling if you prefer); I'm fully aware that we "cry foul" and not "fowl". Reply
  • beginner99 - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    ... makes absolutely no sense.

    "we thought it would be interesting to see just how much performance you give up by gaming with the slower Llano CPU. Ready for some fun? You actually gain 5% performance with the A8-3500M + 6630M compared to the VAIO CA. ...Can you feel my frustration (with Sony) yet?"

    The Charts show the i5 being better in every single benchmark especially starcraft 2, 29 vs 62 fps and you claim i5 has a 9% lead? Sorry but in my math its over 100% faster.

    Again that last paragraph makes 0 sense and contradicts the data.
    Reply
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    Crap... I had the wrong numbers in my spreadsheet. Will update the text, because I was totally flabbergasted by the percentages. Turns out I had numbers from a different laptop listed (but the charts are correct). Thanks for pointing this out! Reply
  • Althernai - Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - link

    Meanwhile, the 6700M, 6800M, and 6900M could all benefit from dynamic switching (assuming the bugs and other issues are worked out), but no one is doing it.


    Actually, HP's dv6t and dv7t have the 6770M with switchable graphics. It was badly broken upon release (dynamic only = OpenGL only on Intel), but HP has since released a BIOS update which allows you to select between Dynamic and Fixed in the BIOS (not in Windows like the Sony, but at least it's possible now).

    How have laptops with AMD switchable graphics fared in terms of driver updates over time?

    Updating drivers on the HP dv6t is not so bad: you need to install AMD's drivers on top of what HP provides, but it seems to work OK as long as you leave out the control center. AMD releases two sets of drivers: the normal type which comes with all kinds of restrictions and the "hotfix" type which can be installed on practically anything (including even FirePro GPUs). You can always get the latter for the current month if there is a problem with downloading the driver.

    Does AMD’s switchable technology work any better under Linux that NVIDIA’s Optimus?[/quote
    Linux support is terrible: unlike Optimus where it usually at least has the decency to use the Intel GPU with the Nvidia one turned off, with dv6t, the discreet GPU is running (I can tell by the thermal behavior), but no drivers for it can be installed and there appears to be no way to use it. It's partially my own fault for using Scientific Linux (it's the latest 6.1 release, but the kernel is still rather old). I will try with Fedora 16 once it comes out, but my only goal is to get the Radeon card to turn off and be able to control the brightness -- actually switching between GPUs is highly unlikely.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now